• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“这个国家是我们的”:集体心理所有权的排他性潜力。

'This country is OURS': The exclusionary potential of collective psychological ownership.

机构信息

Ercomer, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Centre for Research on Self and Identity, University of Southampton, UK.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;60(1):171-195. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12386. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1111/bjso.12386
PMID:32506831
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7818273/
Abstract

Political campaign slogans, such as 'Take back control of our country' (United Kingdom Independence Party) and 'The Netherlands ours again' (Dutch Party for Freedom), indicate that right-wing populism appeals to the belief that the country is 'ours', and therefore, 'we' have the exclusive right to determine what happens. We examined this sense of ownership of the country (i.e. collective psychological ownership [CPO]) with the related determination right in relation to exclusionary attitudes and voting behaviour. Among Dutch (Study 1, N = 572) and British (Study 2, N = 495) participants, we found that CPO explained anti-immigrant and anti-EU attitudes, and these attitudes in turn accounted for voting 'leave' in the 2016 Brexit referendum in the British sample (Study 2). Additionally, CPO was more strongly related to negative immigrant attitudes among right-wing Dutch participants, whereas it was more strongly related to negative EU attitudes and voting 'leave' among left-wing British participants. CPO contributes to the understanding of critical contemporary social attitudes and political behaviour.

摘要

政治竞选口号,如“夺回我们国家的控制权”(英国独立党)和“荷兰再次属于我们”(荷兰自由党),表明右翼民粹主义呼吁人们相信国家是“我们的”,因此,“我们”拥有决定国家命运的专属权利。我们用相关的排除权来检验对国家的这种所有权感(即集体心理所有权)与排他性态度和投票行为之间的关系。在荷兰(研究 1,N=572)和英国(研究 2,N=495)参与者中,我们发现集体心理所有权解释了反移民和反欧盟的态度,而这些态度反过来又解释了英国在 2016 年英国脱欧公投中投票“离开”的行为(研究 2)。此外,在右翼荷兰参与者中,集体心理所有权与负面的移民态度关系更密切,而在左翼英国参与者中,它与负面的欧盟态度和投票“离开”的关系更为密切。集体心理所有权有助于理解当代关键的社会态度和政治行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0067/7818273/53a9ba196968/BJSO-60-171-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0067/7818273/bf66e50ff7b3/BJSO-60-171-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0067/7818273/4308869ed2ea/BJSO-60-171-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0067/7818273/1e84b2ad83ee/BJSO-60-171-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0067/7818273/53a9ba196968/BJSO-60-171-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0067/7818273/bf66e50ff7b3/BJSO-60-171-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0067/7818273/4308869ed2ea/BJSO-60-171-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0067/7818273/1e84b2ad83ee/BJSO-60-171-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0067/7818273/53a9ba196968/BJSO-60-171-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
'This country is OURS': The exclusionary potential of collective psychological ownership.“这个国家是我们的”:集体心理所有权的排他性潜力。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;60(1):171-195. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12386. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
2
Examining the role of positive and negative intergroup contact and anti-immigrant prejudice in Brexit.考察正向和负向的群体间接触以及反移民偏见在英国脱欧中的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2017 Dec;56(4):799-808. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12203. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
3
To Brexit or not to Brexit: The roles of Islamophobia, conspiracist beliefs, and integrated threat in voting intentions for the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum.脱欧还是留欧:在英国欧盟公投中,对伊斯兰教的恐惧、阴谋论信仰和综合威胁对投票意向的作用。
Br J Psychol. 2018 Feb;109(1):156-179. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12252. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
4
Explaining voting in the UK's 2016 EU referendum: Values, attitudes to immigration, European identity and political trust.解读英国2016年脱欧公投中的投票行为:价值观、对移民的态度、欧洲身份认同与政治信任
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Nov;92:102476. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102476. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Collective psychological ownership as a new angle for understanding group dynamics.集体心理所有权:理解群体动态的新视角
Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul 24;35(1):123-161. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2023.2231762. eCollection 2024.
6
The Two Routes of Collective Psychological Ownership: Rights and Responsibilities Explain Intentions to Exclude Outsiders and Engage in Stewardship Behavior.集体心理所有权的两条路径:权利和责任解释了排斥局外人并从事管理行为的意图。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Feb;50(2):270-284. doi: 10.1177/01461672221129757. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
7
Brexit: The influence of motivation to respond without prejudice, willingness to disagree, and attitudes to immigration.英国脱欧:动机、无偏见回应意愿、以及对移民态度的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Jan;60(1):222-247. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12383. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
8
The Relationship between the Brexit Vote and Individual Predictors of Prejudice: Collective Narcissism, Right Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation.英国脱欧公投与偏见的个体预测因素之间的关系:集体自恋、右翼威权主义、社会支配取向
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 27;8:2023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02023. eCollection 2017.
9
Being here First: Ethnic Majority Children's Autochthony Beliefs and Attitudes toward Immigrants.先来后到:多数族裔儿童的本土信仰和对移民的态度。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Jul;48(7):1281-1295. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01015-0. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
10
Ethno-nationalist populism and the mobilization of collective resentment.族群民族主义民粹主义与集体怨恨的动员。
Br J Sociol. 2017 Nov;68 Suppl 1:S181-S213. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12325.

引用本文的文献

1
Does personality matter? Exploring its moderating role on the relationship between neighbourhood ethnic outgroup-size and preferences for Brexit.个性重要吗?探究其对邻里外群体规模与脱欧偏好之间关系的调节作用。
Eur Soc. 2023 Nov 6;26(4):1012-1045. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2023.2277279. eCollection 2024.
2
Collective psychological ownership as a new angle for understanding group dynamics.集体心理所有权:理解群体动态的新视角
Eur Rev Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul 24;35(1):123-161. doi: 10.1080/10463283.2023.2231762. eCollection 2024.
3
The Two Routes of Collective Psychological Ownership: Rights and Responsibilities Explain Intentions to Exclude Outsiders and Engage in Stewardship Behavior.

本文引用的文献

1
Collective Psychological Ownership and Intergroup Relations.集体心理所有权与群际关系。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1021-1039. doi: 10.1177/1745691617706514. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
2
The SPOT effect: People spontaneously prefer their own theories.自我偏好效应:人们会自发地倾向于自己的理论。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jun;70(6):996-1010. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1099162. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
3
The dynamics of radical right-wing populist party preferences and perceived group threat: A comparative panel analysis of three competing hypotheses in the Netherlands and Germany.
集体心理所有权的两条路径:权利和责任解释了排斥局外人并从事管理行为的意图。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Feb;50(2):270-284. doi: 10.1177/01461672221129757. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
4
Support for Conciliatory Policies in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: The Role of Different Modes of Identification and Territorial Ownership Perceptions.以色列-巴勒斯坦冲突中对和解政策的支持:不同认同模式和领土所有权认知的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 5;12:769643. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769643. eCollection 2021.
5
Can 'we' share the contested territory with 'them'? Shared territorial ownership perceptions and reconciliation intentions in Kosovo.我们能否与他们共享有争议的领土?科索沃的共同领土所有权认知与和解意愿。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2022 Apr;61(2):569-586. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12497. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
极右翼民粹主义政党偏好与感知到的群体威胁动态:荷兰和德国三种竞争假说的比较面板分析
Soc Sci Res. 2016 Jan;55:83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
4
Explanations of the endowment effect: an integrative review.禀赋效应的解释:综合评述。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jun;19(6):339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 1.
5
Children apply principles of physical ownership to ideas.儿童将物理所有权原则应用于观念。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Nov-Dec;36(8):1383-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01265.x. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
6
Young children's understanding of violations of property rights.儿童对侵犯财产权的理解。
Cognition. 2011 Nov;121(2):219-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
7
Preschoolers infer ownership from "control of permission".学龄前儿童通过“对许可的控制”来推断所有权。
Dev Psychol. 2009 May;45(3):873-6. doi: 10.1037/a0014088.
8
The end of the end of ideology.意识形态终结的终结。
Am Psychol. 2006 Oct;61(7):651-70. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.651.
9
A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice.一种偏见表达与体验的正当化抑制模型。
Psychol Bull. 2003 May;129(3):414-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414.
10
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.作为动机性社会认知的政治保守主义
Psychol Bull. 2003 May;129(3):339-75. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339.