Interdisciplinary Social Science/Ercomer, Utrecht University.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;12(6):1021-1039. doi: 10.1177/1745691617706514. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
Whereas much social psychological research has studied the in-group and out-group implications of social categorization and collective identity ("we"), little research has examined the nature and relevance of collective psychological ownership ("ours") for intergroup relations. We make a case for considering collective psychological ownership as an important source of intergroup tensions. We do so by integrating theory and research from various social sciences, and we draw out implications for future social psychological research on intergroup relations. We discuss collective psychological ownership in relation to the psychology of possessions, marking behavior, intergroup threats, outgroup exclusion, and in-group responsibility. We suggest that the social psychological processes discussed apply to a range of ownership objects (territory, buildings, cultural artifacts) and various intergroup settings, including international, national, and local contexts, and in organizations and communities. We conclude by providing directions for future research in different intergroup contexts.
虽然许多社会心理学研究都研究了社会分类和集体认同(“我们”)的内群体和外群体含义,但很少有研究探讨集体心理所有权(“我们的”)对群体间关系的性质和相关性。我们认为,集体心理所有权是群体间紧张关系的一个重要来源。我们通过整合来自不同社会科学的理论和研究来做到这一点,并为未来关于群体间关系的社会心理学研究得出了一些启示。我们讨论了集体心理所有权与占有心理学、标记行为、群体间威胁、排斥外群体以及内群体责任之间的关系。我们认为,所讨论的社会心理过程适用于一系列的所有权对象(领土、建筑物、文化遗产)和各种群体间环境,包括国际、国家和地方背景,以及在组织和社区中。最后,我们为不同群体间背景下的未来研究提供了方向。