Crippen Tawni L, Kim Dongmin, Poole Toni L, Swiger Sonja L, Anderson Robin C
Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, College Station, TX, United States.
Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Front Microbiol. 2024 Feb 21;14:1327841. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1327841. eCollection 2023.
Fundamental investigations into the location, load, and persistence of microbes, whether beneficial or detrimental, are scarce. Many questions about the retention and survival of microbes on various surfaces, as well as the load necessary for spread, exist. To answer these questions, we must know more about where to find various microbes and in what concentrations, the composition of the microbial communities, and the extent of dissemination between various elements. This study investigated the diversity, composition, and relative abundance of the communities associated with manure, lagoons, troughs, house flies, and stable flies present at a dairy, implementing two different free-stall management systems: flow-through and cross-vent. Shotgun metagenomics at the community level was used to compare the microbiomes within the dairy, allowing confident interpretation at the species level.
The results showed that there were significant difference in microbial composition between not only each of the dairy elements but also management styles. The primary exceptions were the microbiomes of the house fly and the stable fly. Their compositions heavily overlapped with one another, but interestingly, not with the other components sampled. Additionally, both species of flies carried more pathogens than the other elements of the dairy, indicating that they may not share these organisms with the other components, or that the environments offered by the other components are unsatisfactory for the survival of some pathogens..
The lack of overlapping pathogen profiles suggests a lack of transfer from flies to other dairy elements. Dairy health data, showing a low incidence of disease, suggests minimal sharing of bacteria by the flies at a level required for infection, given the health program of this dairy. While flies did carry a multitude of pathogenic bacteria, the mere presence of the bacteria associated with the flies did not necessarily translate into high risk leading to morbidity and mortality at this dairy. Thus, using flies as the sole sentinel of dairy health may not be appropriate for all bacterial pathogens or dairies.
对于微生物的位置、负荷及持久性(无论有益还是有害)的基础研究都很匮乏。关于微生物在各种表面上的留存和存活情况,以及传播所需的负荷,存在许多问题。为了回答这些问题,我们必须更多地了解在何处能找到各种微生物及其浓度、微生物群落的组成,以及不同元素之间的传播程度。本研究调查了一家实施两种不同散栏管理系统(即流水式和横向通风式)的奶牛场中与粪便、泻湖、食槽、家蝇和厩蝇相关的群落的多样性、组成和相对丰度。采用群落水平的鸟枪法宏基因组学来比较奶牛场内的微生物群落,从而能够在物种水平上进行可靠的解读。
结果表明,不仅奶牛场的各个元素之间,而且管理方式之间的微生物组成都存在显著差异。主要的例外是家蝇和厩蝇的微生物群落。它们的组成彼此高度重叠,但有趣的是,与其他采样成分并不重叠。此外,这两种苍蝇携带的病原体比奶牛场的其他元素更多,这表明它们可能不会与其他成分共享这些微生物,或者其他成分所提供的环境对某些病原体的生存并不适宜。
病原体谱缺乏重叠表明苍蝇向奶牛场其他元素的传播较少。奶牛场的健康数据显示疾病发病率较低,鉴于该奶牛场的健康计划,这表明苍蝇传播的细菌在感染所需水平上的共享极少。虽然苍蝇确实携带了大量致病细菌,但在这个奶牛场,仅仅存在与苍蝇相关的细菌并不一定会转化为导致发病和死亡的高风险。因此,将苍蝇作为奶牛场健康的唯一哨兵可能并不适用于所有细菌病原体或奶牛场。