Matthews Kirstin R W, Lakshmanan Rekha, Kalakuntla Neha, Tallapragada Neha
Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, MS-40, Houston, TX 77478, USA.
The Immunization Partnership, PO Box 346, Houston, TX 77001, USA.
Vaccine X. 2024 Feb 28;18:100468. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100468. eCollection 2024 Jun.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was an observed increase in anti-vaccine sentiment linked with requirements for the vaccines. But how did these ideas impact the politics of vaccines? In this paper, the authors analyze witness statements from the 2021 Texas Legislative Session during vaccine-related hearings. Specifically, the research focused on five hearings for bills that related to vaccine requirements or vaccine transparency laws filed during the 2021Texas Legislative Session and witnesses who opposed these measures. From the 128 witnesses cataloged and analyzed, we found 84 witnesses opposed to vaccines. Medical freedom and the right to opt-out of a medical procedure as well as concerns about vaccine safety and effectiveness were most frequently used by witnesses to justify their stance against vaccine requirements or vaccines. While some witnesses were opposed to all vaccines, most focused their objections on the COVID-19 vaccine specifically.
在新冠疫情期间,人们观察到反疫苗情绪随着疫苗要求的出现而增加。但这些观点如何影响疫苗政治呢?在本文中,作者分析了2021年得克萨斯州立法会议期间与疫苗相关听证会上的证人陈述。具体而言,该研究聚焦于2021年得克萨斯州立法会议期间提交的与疫苗要求或疫苗透明度法律相关的五项法案的听证会,以及反对这些措施的证人。在对编目和分析的128名证人中,我们发现84名证人反对疫苗。证人最常使用医疗自由、选择不接受医疗程序的权利以及对疫苗安全性和有效性的担忧来为其反对疫苗要求或疫苗的立场辩护。虽然一些证人反对所有疫苗,但大多数人将其反对意见具体集中在新冠疫苗上。
Tex Med. 1989-10
J Med Internet Res. 2022-3-29
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023-4-13
Univ Mich J Law Reform. 2004
J Med Internet Res. 2022-2-8
Nat Hum Behav. 2023-2
Am J Public Health. 2022-2
Nature. 2021-9
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021-4-1
J Clin Invest. 2021-4-1