• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验生物医学研究中数据管理和共享的最佳实践。

Best practices for data management and sharing in experimental biomedical research.

机构信息

Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

Center for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

Physiol Rev. 2024 Jul 1;104(3):1387-1408. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2023. Epub 2024 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1152/physrev.00043.2023
PMID:38451234
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11380994/
Abstract

Effective data management is crucial for scientific integrity and reproducibility, a cornerstone of scientific progress. Well-organized and well-documented data enable validation and building on results. Data management encompasses activities including organization, documentation, storage, sharing, and preservation. Robust data management establishes credibility, fostering trust within the scientific community and benefiting researchers' careers. In experimental biomedicine, comprehensive data management is vital due to the typically intricate protocols, extensive metadata, and large datasets. Low-throughput experiments, in particular, require careful management to address variations and errors in protocols and raw data quality. Transparent and accountable research practices rely on accurate documentation of procedures, data collection, and analysis methods. Proper data management ensures long-term preservation and accessibility of valuable datasets. Well-managed data can be revisited, contributing to cumulative knowledge and potential new discoveries. Publicly funded research has an added responsibility for transparency, resource allocation, and avoiding redundancy. Meeting funding agency expectations increasingly requires rigorous methodologies, adherence to standards, comprehensive documentation, and widespread sharing of data, code, and other auxiliary resources. This review provides critical insights into raw and processed data, metadata, high-throughput versus low-throughput datasets, a common language for documentation, experimental and reporting guidelines, efficient data management systems, sharing practices, and relevant repositories. We systematically present available resources and optimal practices for wide use by experimental biomedical researchers.

摘要

有效的数据管理对于科学诚信和可重复性至关重要,是科学进步的基石。组织良好且记录完备的数据可实现结果的验证和扩展。数据管理包括组织、记录、存储、共享和保存等活动。稳健的数据管理建立了可信度,在科学界内部培养了信任,并有益于研究人员的职业发展。在实验生物医学中,由于典型的复杂方案、大量元数据和大型数据集,全面的数据管理至关重要。特别是低通量实验需要仔细管理,以解决方案和原始数据质量中的变化和错误。透明和负责任的研究实践依赖于程序、数据收集和分析方法的准确记录。适当的数据管理可确保有价值数据集的长期保存和可访问性。管理良好的数据可以重新访问,为累积知识和潜在新发现做出贡献。公共资助的研究除了要透明、合理分配资源外,还要避免重复。为了满足资助机构的期望,越来越需要严格的方法、遵守标准、全面的文档记录以及广泛的数据、代码和其他辅助资源共享。本综述提供了有关原始和处理后数据、元数据、高通量与低通量数据集、文档的通用语言、实验和报告指南、高效的数据管理系统、共享实践以及相关存储库的重要见解。我们系统地展示了现有的资源和最佳实践,以供实验生物医学研究人员广泛使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd91/11380994/610bfee45608/prv-00043-2023r01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd91/11380994/610bfee45608/prv-00043-2023r01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd91/11380994/610bfee45608/prv-00043-2023r01.jpg

相似文献

1
Best practices for data management and sharing in experimental biomedical research.实验生物医学研究中数据管理和共享的最佳实践。
Physiol Rev. 2024 Jul 1;104(3):1387-1408. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2023. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
2
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
3
Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice.采用掠夺性做法的期刊正在系统性地侵蚀科学精神:一种减少其运营空间并恢复研究最佳实践的把关与编码策略。
Microb Biotechnol. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70180. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70180.
4
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
5
Journal of Global Health's Guidelines for Reporting Analyses of Big Data Repositories Open to the Public (GRABDROP): preventing 'paper mills', duplicate publications, misuse of statistical inference, and inappropriate use of artificial intelligence.《全球健康杂志》关于公开大数据存储库分析报告的指南(GRABDROP):防止“论文工厂”、重复发表、统计推断的滥用以及人工智能的不当使用。
J Glob Health. 2025 Jul 1;15:01004. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.01004.
6
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
7
GRAPEVNE - Graphical Analytical Pipeline Development Environment for Infectious Diseases.GRAPEVNE - 传染病图形分析管道开发环境
Wellcome Open Res. 2025 May 27;10:279. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23824.1. eCollection 2025.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
10
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing modified olfactory training to prevent cognitive decline in MCI high-risk individuals: a multicentre randomised controlled trial protocol in Beijing tertiary hospitals.评估改良嗅觉训练对轻度认知障碍高危个体认知功能衰退的预防作用:一项北京三级医院的多中心随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e100880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100880.
2
Emotional Impairments in Animal Models of Traumatic Neuropathic Pain: Where Do We Stand?创伤性神经性疼痛动物模型中的情绪障碍:我们目前的状况如何?
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 Jan 15;5(1):100424. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100424. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Computational reproducibility of Jupyter notebooks from biomedical publications.生物医学出版物中 Jupyter 笔记本的计算可重复性。
Gigascience. 2024 Jan 2;13. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giad113.
2
Ten quick tips for building FAIR workflows.构建FAIR工作流程的十条快速提示。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Sep 28;19(9):e1011369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011369. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Community-developed checklists for publishing images and image analyses.社区开发的图像发布和图像分析检查表。
Nat Methods. 2024 Feb;21(2):170-181. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01987-9. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
4
How to make your scientific data accessible, discoverable and useful.如何让你的科学数据易于获取、便于发现且实用。
Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7967):1098-1099. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-01929-7.
5
Multifaceted mitochondria: moving mitochondrial science beyond function and dysfunction.多面线粒体:将线粒体科学从功能和功能障碍的局限中解放出来。
Nat Metab. 2023 Apr;5(4):546-562. doi: 10.1038/s42255-023-00783-1. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
6
Data Provenance in Biomedical Research: Scoping Review.生物医学研究中的数据溯源:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 27;25:e42289. doi: 10.2196/42289.
7
Implementing clinical trial data sharing requires training a new generation of biomedical researchers.实施临床试验数据共享需要培养新一代生物医学研究人员。
Nat Med. 2023 Feb;29(2):298-301. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02080-y.
8
Algorithms to anonymize structured medical and healthcare data: A systematic review.使结构化医学和医疗保健数据匿名化的算法:一项系统综述。
Front Bioinform. 2022 Dec 22;2:984807. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.984807. eCollection 2022.
9
Lessons learnt from registration of biomedical research.从生物医学研究注册中吸取的经验教训。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jan;7(1):9-12. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01499-0.
10
Improving the reproducibility of metabolic research.提高代谢研究的可重复性。
Nat Metab. 2022 Sep;4(9):1085. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00653-2.