de Heer Merel H, Driessen Erik W, Teunissen Pim W, Scheele Fedde
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences (FHML), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 22;11:1339857. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1339857. eCollection 2024.
Curricula for postgraduate medical education have transformed since the introduction of competency based medical education (CBME). Postgraduate training plans offer broader training with different competencies and an outcome-based approach, in addition to the medical technical aspects of training. However, CBME also has its challenges. Over the past years, critical views have been shared on the potential drawbacks of CBME, such as assessment burden and conflicts with practicality in the workplace. Recent studies identified a need for a better understanding of how the evolving concept of CBME has been translated to curriculum design and implemented in the practice of postgraduate training. The aim of this study was to describe the development of CBME translations to curriculum design, based on three consecutive postgraduate training programs spanning 17 years.
We performed a document analysis of three consecutive Dutch gynecology and obstetrics training plans that were implemented in 2005, 2013, and 2021. We used template analysis to identify changes over time.
Over time, CBME-based curriculum design changed in several domains. Assessment changed from a model with a focus on summative decision to one with an emphasis on formative, low-stakes assessments aimed at supporting learning. The training plans evolved in parallel to evolving educational insights, e.g., by placing increasing emphasis on personal development. The curricula focused on a competency-based concept by introducing training modules and personalized authorization based on feedback rather than on a set duration of internships. There was increasing freedom in personalized training trajectories in the training plans, together with increasing trust towards the resident.
The way CBME was translated into training plans has evolved in the course of 17 years of experience with CMBE-based education. The main areas of change were the structure of the training plans, which became increasingly open, the degree to which learning outcomes were mandatory or not, and the way these outcomes were assessed.
自引入基于胜任力的医学教育(CBME)以来,研究生医学教育课程发生了转变。研究生培训计划除了提供医学技术方面的培训外,还提供具有不同胜任力的更广泛培训以及基于结果的方法。然而,CBME也面临挑战。在过去几年中,人们对CBME的潜在缺点,如评估负担以及与工作场所实用性的冲突,表达了批判性观点。最近的研究表明,需要更好地理解不断演变的CBME概念是如何转化为课程设计并在研究生培训实践中实施的。本研究的目的是基于连续17年的三个研究生培训项目,描述CBME转化为课程设计的发展情况。
我们对2005年、2013年和2021年实施的三个连续的荷兰妇产科培训计划进行了文献分析。我们使用模板分析来识别随时间的变化。
随着时间的推移,基于CBME的课程设计在几个领域发生了变化。评估从侧重于总结性决策的模式转变为强调形成性、低风险评估以支持学习的模式。培训计划随着教育见解的演变而同步发展,例如,越来越强调个人发展。课程通过引入培训模块和基于反馈而非固定实习期限的个性化授权,专注于基于胜任力的概念。培训计划中个性化培训轨迹的自由度增加,同时对住院医师的信任度也在增加。
在基于CBME的教育17年的经验过程中,CBME转化为培训计划的方式发生了演变。主要变化领域包括培训计划的结构,其变得越来越开放;学习成果的强制程度;以及这些成果的评估方式。