Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0299448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299448. eCollection 2024.
Total marrow irradiation (TMI) and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) have the advantages. However, delineating target lesions according to TMI and TMLI plans is labor-intensive and time-consuming. In addition, although the delineation of target lesions between TMI and TMLI differs, the clinical distinction is not clear, and the lymph node (LN) area coverage during TMI remains uncertain. Accordingly, this study calculates the LN area coverage according to the TMI plan. Further, a deep learning-based model for delineating LN areas is trained and evaluated.
Whole-body regional LN areas were manually contoured in patients treated according to a TMI plan. The dose coverage of the delineated LN areas in the TMI plan was estimated. To train the deep learning model for automatic segmentation, additional whole-body computed tomography data were obtained from other patients. The patients and data were divided into training/validation and test groups and models were developed using the "nnU-NET" framework. The trained models were evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision, recall, and Hausdorff distance 95 (HD95). The time required to contour and trim predicted results manually using the deep learning model was measured and compared.
The dose coverage for LN areas by TMI plan had V100% (the percentage of volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose), V95%, and V90% median values of 46.0%, 62.1%, and 73.5%, respectively. The lowest V100% values were identified in the inguinal (14.7%), external iliac (21.8%), and para-aortic (42.8%) LNs. The median values of DSC, precision, recall, and HD95 of the trained model were 0.79, 0.83, 0.76, and 2.63, respectively. The time for manual contouring and simply modified predicted contouring were statistically significantly different.
The dose coverage in the inguinal, external iliac, and para-aortic LN areas was suboptimal when treatment is administered according to the TMI plan. This research demonstrates that the automatic delineation of LN areas using deep learning can facilitate the implementation of TMLI.
全身骨髓照射(TMI)和全身骨髓及淋巴照射(TMLI)具有优势。然而,根据 TMI 和 TMLI 计划描绘靶区是劳动密集型且耗时的。此外,尽管 TMI 和 TMLI 之间的靶区描绘有所不同,但临床区别并不明显,TMI 期间的淋巴结(LN)区域覆盖范围也不确定。因此,本研究根据 TMI 计划计算 LN 区域覆盖范围。进一步训练和评估基于深度学习的 LN 区域描绘模型。
根据 TMI 计划治疗的患者的全身区域 LN 区域进行手动描绘。估计 TMI 计划中描绘的 LN 区域的剂量覆盖范围。为了训练用于自动分割的深度学习模型,从其他患者获得额外的全身计算机断层扫描数据。患者和数据分为训练/验证和测试组,并使用“nnU-NET”框架开发模型。使用 Dice 相似系数(DSC)、精度、召回率和 Hausdorff 距离 95(HD95)评估训练的模型。测量并比较使用深度学习模型手动描绘和修剪预测结果所需的时间。
TMI 计划中 LN 区域的剂量覆盖范围具有 V100%(接受处方剂量 100%的体积百分比)、V95%和 V90%中位数值分别为 46.0%、62.1%和 73.5%。腹股沟(14.7%)、外髂(21.8%)和腹主动脉旁(42.8%)LN 中 V100%的最低值。训练模型的 DSC、精度、召回率和 HD95 的中位数值分别为 0.79、0.83、0.76 和 2.63。手动描绘和简单修改预测描绘的时间存在统计学差异。
根据 TMI 计划进行治疗时,腹股沟、外髂和腹主动脉旁 LN 区域的剂量覆盖范围不理想。本研究表明,使用深度学习自动描绘 LN 区域可以促进 TMLI 的实施。