• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本低位前切除术治疗直肠癌中转开腹的内镜手术技能资质体系影响(EnSSURE 研究的二次分析)。

Impact of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system on conversion to laparotomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in Japan (a secondary analysis of the EnSSURE study).

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2454-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10740-y. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-024-10740-y
PMID:38459211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11078784/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Conversion to laparotomy is among the serious intraoperative complications and carries an increased risk of postoperative complications. In this cohort study, we investigated whether or not the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) affects the conversion rate among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective secondary analysis of data collected from patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for cStage II and III rectal cancer from 2014 to 2016 across 56 institutions affiliated with the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Data from the original EnSSURE study were analyzed to investigate risk factors for conversion to laparotomy by performing univariate and multivariate analyses based on the reason for conversion.

RESULTS

Data were collected for 3,168 cases, including 65 (2.1%) involving conversion to laparotomy. Indicated conversion accounted for 27 cases (0.9%), while technical conversion accounted for 35 cases (1.1%). The multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors for indicated conversion to laparotomy: tumor diameter [mm] (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05, p = 0.0002), combined resection of adjacent organs [+/-] (OR 7.92, 95% CI 3.14-19.97, p < 0.0001), and surgical participation of an ESSQS-certified physician [-/+] (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.01-9.90, p = 0.0002). The multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors for technical conversion to laparotomy: registered case number of institution (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, p = 0.0029), institution type [non-university/university hospital] (OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.54-8.04, p = 0.0028), combined resection of adjacent organs [+/-] (OR 5.96, 95% CI 2.15-16.53, p = 0.0006), and surgical participation of an ESSQS-certified physician [-/+] (OR 6.26, 95% CI 3.01-13.05, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Participation of ESSQS-certified physicians may reduce the risk of both indicated and technical conversion. Referral to specialized institutions, such as high-volume centers and university hospitals, especially for patients exhibiting relevant background risk factors, may reduce the risk of conversion to laparotomy and lead to better outcomes for patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000040645.

摘要

背景与目的

中转开腹是术中严重并发症之一,会增加术后并发症的风险。在这项队列研究中,我们调查了内镜手术技能资格认证系统(ESSQS)是否会影响接受腹腔镜直肠癌手术患者的中转率。

方法

我们对 2014 年至 2016 年间,日本腹腔镜结直肠外科学会下属 56 家机构中接受腹腔镜 cT2-3 期直肠癌手术的患者进行了数据回顾性二次分析。对原始 EnSSURE 研究的数据进行分析,根据中转原因进行单因素和多因素分析,以探讨中转开腹的危险因素。

结果

共纳入 3168 例患者,其中 65 例(2.1%)中转开腹。指征性中转占 27 例(0.9%),技术性中转占 35 例(1.1%)。多因素分析确定了指征性中转开腹的独立危险因素:肿瘤直径[mm](比值比[OR] 1.01,95%置信区间[CI] 1.01-1.05,p=0.0002)、合并相邻器官切除[+/-](OR 7.92,95% CI 3.14-19.97,p<0.0001)和手术医生 ESSQS 认证[+/-](OR 4.46,95% CI 2.01-9.90,p=0.0002)。多因素分析确定了技术性中转开腹的危险因素:机构登记病例数(OR 0.99,95% CI 0.99-1.00,p=0.0029)、机构类型[非大学/大学医院](OR 3.52,95% CI 1.54-8.04,p=0.0028)、合并相邻器官切除[+/-](OR 5.96,95% CI 2.15-16.53,p=0.0006)和手术医生 ESSQS 认证[+/-](OR 6.26,95% CI 3.01-13.05,p<0.0001)。

结论

ESSQS 认证医生的参与可能降低指征性和技术性中转的风险。将患者转至专科机构,如高容量中心和大学医院,特别是对于存在相关背景风险因素的患者,可能降低中转开腹的风险,从而改善患者结局。

试验注册

本研究在日本临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为 UMIN000040645。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/157a/11078784/67c1a153400d/464_2024_10740_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/157a/11078784/67c1a153400d/464_2024_10740_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/157a/11078784/67c1a153400d/464_2024_10740_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system on conversion to laparotomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in Japan (a secondary analysis of the EnSSURE study).日本低位前切除术治疗直肠癌中转开腹的内镜手术技能资质体系影响(EnSSURE 研究的二次分析)。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2454-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10740-y. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
Impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification on Laparoscopic Resections for Rectal Cancer in Japan: The EnSSURE Study.日本内镜外科技能资质对直肠癌腹腔镜切除术的影响:EnSSURE研究
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Apr 22;3(2):e160. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000160. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System-certified surgeons as operators in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery in Japan: A propensity score-matched analysis (subanalysis of the EnSSURE study).日本内镜外科技能资格认证系统认证的外科医生作为腹腔镜直肠癌手术术者的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析(EnSSURE研究的子分析)
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024 Jul 9;8(6):1046-1055. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12841. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Usefulness of participation of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system-qualified surgeons in laparoscopic high anterior resection.内镜手术技能资格认证系统认证医师参与腹腔镜超低位前切除术的实用性。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e13409. doi: 10.1111/ases.13409.
5
Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System: propensity-score matched cohort analysis of accredited supervisors in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.内镜手术技能资格认证系统:腹腔镜直肠癌手术认证导师的倾向评分匹配队列分析。
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1834-1839. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad282.
6
Effect of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic rectal surgery: Japanese multicenter analysis.腹腔镜直肠手术的内镜手术技能资格认定系统的效果:日本多中心分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):394-400. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11407-4. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
7
Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术对直肠癌切除患者中转开腹风险的影响:ROLARR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219.
8
Impact of technically qualified surgeons on laparoscopic colorectal resection outcomes: results of a propensity score-matching analysis.技术合格的外科医生对腹腔镜结直肠切除术结果的影响:倾向评分匹配分析的结果。
BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):486-498. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50263. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
9
Effect of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic multivisceral resection: Japanese multicenter analysis.腹腔镜多脏器切除内镜手术技能资格认定系统的效果:日本多中心分析
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3068-3075. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08605-9. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
10
Usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: short-term outcomes: a single-center and retrospective analysis.内镜手术技能资格认证系统在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中的应用价值:短期疗效:单中心回顾性分析
BMC Surg. 2019 Jul 11;19(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0528-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence-enhanced navigation for nerve recognition and surgical education in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.人工智能增强导航在腹腔镜结直肠手术中的神经识别与手术教育应用
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1388-1396. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11489-0. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
2
Effect of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic rectal surgery: Japanese multicenter analysis.腹腔镜直肠手术的内镜手术技能资格认定系统的效果:日本多中心分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):394-400. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11407-4. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
IGFL2 expression and surgical volume: Independent predictors of survival in gastric cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Available prediction scores of conversion for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery seem to be unsuitable for nowadays rectal cancer management.现有的腹腔镜直肠癌手术转化预测评分似乎并不适用于当今的直肠癌治疗。
BMC Surg. 2022 May 10;22(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01617-9.
2
Clinical impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery (JSES) for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and low anterior resection based on the National Clinical Database (NCD) registry.日本内镜外科学会(JSES)的内镜手术技能资格认定系统(ESSQS)基于国家临床数据库(NCD)登记,对腹腔镜远端胃切除术和低位前切除术的临床影响。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Aug 31;4(6):721-734. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12384. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
IGFL2 表达与手术量:胃癌患者生存的独立预测因子。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 4;103(40):e39910. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039910.
4
Comparison of Early Clinical and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Converted Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.腹腔镜与中转直肠癌切除术的早期临床及长期肿瘤学结局比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 22;16(7):e65086. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65086. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgery.腹腔镜和机器人直肠癌手术中转的危险因素。
Br J Surg. 2020 Apr;107(5):560-566. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11435. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
4
Risk factors for early postoperative complications after D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer: Supplementary analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Japan (JCOG0404).II 期或 III 期结肠癌 D3 根治术后早期并发症的危险因素:日本多中心随机对照试验(JCOG0404)的补充分析
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Apr 4;3(3):310-317. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12246. eCollection 2019 May.
5
Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放直肠癌根治术后无病生存和局部复发:澳大利亚腹腔镜直肠癌随机临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):596-602. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003021.
6
Influence of Conversion and Anastomotic Leakage on Survival in Rectal Cancer Surgery; Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.直肠癌手术中转化和吻合口漏对生存的影响:回顾性横断面研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):2007-2018. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3931-6. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
7
Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗 II 期至 III 期直肠癌的无病生存和局部复发比较:ACOSOG Z6051 随机对照试验的随访结果。
Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):589-595. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002.
8
Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术对直肠癌切除患者中转开腹风险的影响:ROLARR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219.
9
Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery?机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠癌切除术的并发症及中转率比较:哪些患者和医疗服务提供者能从机器人辅助手术中获益最多?
J Med Econ. 2018 Mar;21(3):254-261. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1396994. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
10
Laparoscopic Versus Open Lateral Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Low Rectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of a Large Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.腹腔镜与开放手术行局部进展期低位直肠癌侧方淋巴结清扫术:日本一项大型多中心队列研究的亚组分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Sep;60(9):954-964. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000843.