• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜和机器人直肠癌手术中转的危险因素。

Risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgery.

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2020 Apr;107(5):560-566. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11435. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.11435
PMID:31976558
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to review risk factors for conversion in a cohort of patients with rectal cancer undergoing minimally invasive abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive patients operated on from February 2005 to April 2018. Adult patients undergoing low anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection for primary rectal adenocarcinoma by a minimally invasive approach were included. Exclusion criteria were lack of research authorization, stage IV or recurrent rectal cancer, and emergency surgery. Risk factors for conversion were investigated using logistic regression. A subgroup analysis of obese patients (BMI 30 kg/m or more) was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 600 patients were included in the analysis. The overall conversion rate was 9·2 per cent. Multivariable analysis showed a 72 per cent lower risk of conversion when patients had robotic surgery (odds ratio (OR) 0·28, 95 per cent c.i. 0·15 to 0·52). Obese patients experienced a threefold higher risk of conversion compared with non-obese patients (47 versus 24·4 per cent respectively; P < 0·001). Robotic surgery was associated with a reduced risk of conversion in obese patients (OR 0·22, 0·07 to 0·71).

CONCLUSION

Robotic surgery was associated with a lower risk of conversion in patients undergoing minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery, in both obese and non-obese patients.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在回顾接受微创腹部手术的直肠癌患者队列中转手术的风险因素。

方法

对 2005 年 2 月至 2018 年 4 月连续接受手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。纳入接受微创入路治疗原发性直肠腺癌的低位前切除术或腹会阴切除术的成年患者。排除标准为缺乏研究授权、IV 期或复发性直肠癌和急诊手术。使用逻辑回归分析转手术的风险因素。对肥胖患者(BMI 30kg/m 或更高)进行了亚组分析。

结果

共纳入 600 例患者进行分析。总体中转手术率为 9.2%。多变量分析显示,当患者接受机器人手术时,中转手术的风险降低了 72%(比值比 (OR) 0.28,95%置信区间 0.15 至 0.52)。肥胖患者的中转手术风险比非肥胖患者高 3 倍(分别为 47%和 24.4%;P<0.001)。机器人手术与肥胖患者中转手术风险降低相关(OR 0.22,0.07 至 0.71)。

结论

在接受微创直肠癌手术的肥胖和非肥胖患者中,机器人手术与中转手术风险降低相关。

相似文献

1
Risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgery.腹腔镜和机器人直肠癌手术中转的危险因素。
Br J Surg. 2020 Apr;107(5):560-566. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11435. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
2
Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.中低位直肠癌的全直肠系膜切除术:腹腔镜手术与机器人手术对比
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr 7;22(13):3602-10. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i13.3602.
3
Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.机器人辅助手术与传统腹腔镜手术对直肠癌切除患者中转开腹风险的影响:ROLARR随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 24;318(16):1569-1580. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219.
4
Evaluation of the robotic approach concerning pitfalls in rectal surgery.直肠手术陷阱相关机器人手术方法的评估
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;43(7):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.12.014. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
5
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜直肠手术治疗肥胖和病态肥胖患者:ACS-NSQIP 分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):637-643. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01462-1. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.机器人与腹腔镜直肠切除术用于保留肛门手术:单中心 130 例连续患者的病理和短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4085-4091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5455-7. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
7
Does Robot Overcome Obesity-related Limitations of Minimally Invasive Rectal Surgery for Cancer?机器人能否克服肥胖相关的直肠癌微创手术局限性?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Feb;28(1):e8-e11. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000500.
8
Robotic Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis.机器人直肠癌切除术:一项回顾性多中心分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;22(7):2151-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4278-1. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
9
[Efficacy comparison of robotic and laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer for overweight and obese patients].[机器人手术与腹腔镜手术对超重和肥胖直肠癌患者行根治性切除的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 25;24(1):68-74. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200116-00027.
10
The effect of increasing body mass index on laparoscopic surgery for colon and rectal cancer.体重指数增加对结肠癌和直肠癌腹腔镜手术的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20(9):778-788. doi: 10.1111/codi.14107. Epub 2018 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The perioperative results of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.肥胖患者直肠癌机器人手术与腹腔镜手术的围手术期结果:系统评价与荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03781-7.
2
A prospective study on the enhancement of surgical safety in robotic surgery: The BirdView camera system.关于增强机器人手术中手术安全性的前瞻性研究:BirdView 摄像系统
Surg Today. 2024 Dec 9. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02975-y.
3
Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer: Oncological and Short-Term Outcomes.
机器人辅助与腹腔镜下直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术的比较系统评价和Meta分析:肿瘤学及短期结局
Cureus. 2024 Nov 2;16(11):e72877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72877. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
An artificial intelligence-designed predictive calculator of conversion from minimally invasive to open colectomy in colon cancer.人工智能设计的结肠癌微创转为开腹手术的预测计算器。
Updates Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):1321-1330. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01915-2. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
5
The impact of robotic rectal cancer surgery at a Canadian regional cancer centre: a retrospective cohort study.加拿大地区癌症中心机器人直肠癌手术的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Can J Surg. 2024 May 1;67(3):E206-E213. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002523. Print 2024 May-Jun.
6
Conversion rate to open surgery during transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: a single-center experience.经肛全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌中转开腹率:单中心经验。
Updates Surg. 2024 Jun;76(3):943-947. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01844-0. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes comparing the efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese patients.一项系统评价和荟萃分析比较了肥胖患者机器人与腹腔镜结直肠手术短期疗效的比较。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 9;18(1):167. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01934-6.
8
Impact of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system on conversion to laparotomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in Japan (a secondary analysis of the EnSSURE study).日本低位前切除术治疗直肠癌中转开腹的内镜手术技能资质体系影响(EnSSURE 研究的二次分析)。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2454-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10740-y. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
9
Laparoscopic rectal cancer resection yields comparable clinical and oncological results with shorter hospital stay compared to open access: a 5-year national cohort.腹腔镜直肠癌切除术与开放手术相比,具有相似的临床和肿瘤学结果,且住院时间更短:一项为期 5 年的全国队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Oct 4;38(1):247. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04529-z.
10
Impact of obesity on patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer in Australia and New Zealand.肥胖对在澳大利亚和新西兰接受直肠癌手术的患者的影响。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun 8;38(1):163. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04447-0.