• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴拉圭查科地区的畜牧业前沿:基于地方主体的视角。

The Livestock Frontier in the Paraguayan Chaco: A Local Agent-based Perspective.

机构信息

Department of Animal and Food Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193, Spain.

Agroecology and Food Systems Chair, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya, Vic, 08500, Spain.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;73(6):1231-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01957-7. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-024-01957-7
PMID:38459261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11136858/
Abstract

Deforestation is one of the most relevant transformations characterizing global environmental change in the tropics at present. There is wide consensus in pointing the context-dependent nature of tropical deforestation. In this sense, a better characterization of the phenomenon considering the social context could provide a more accurate picture of tropical deforestation. With this aim, a Q-methodology discourse analysis was conducted to characterise the different discourses that coexist in the particular region of the Paraguayan Chaco concerning the development of cattle ranching and derived deforestation. Four different discourses were identified as making sense the wide range of interests and values coexisting and clashing in the Paraguayan Chaco, namely: the Environmentalist discourse, the Business discourse, the Resigned discourse, and the Possibilist discourse. The results point that the fundamental differences between the discourses are largely explained by the different positions on three specific domains: (i) the socio-economic benefits the expansion of cattle ranching brings about; (ii) the environmental impacts the expansion of cattle ranching and the derived deforestation brings on; and, finally (iii) the degree to which an active intervention from the side of policy making to regulate the expansion of cattle ranching and to minimize possible detrimental effects is seen as necessary. The position of the different discourses in relation to these domains could help policy makers to make measures and regulations more widely accepted and followed.

摘要

森林砍伐是目前热带全球环境变化中最相关的转变之一。人们普遍认为热带森林砍伐具有语境依赖性。从这个意义上说,考虑到社会背景,更准确地描述这一现象,可以更准确地描绘热带森林砍伐的情况。为此,采用 Q 方法论话语分析,对巴拉圭查科地区有关养牛业发展和由此产生的森林砍伐的不同话语进行了特征描述。确定了四个不同的话语,这些话语使人们能够理解巴拉圭查科地区共存和冲突的广泛利益和价值观,即:环保主义者话语、商业话语、顺从话语和可能主义话语。研究结果表明,话语之间的根本差异主要是由三个特定领域的不同立场解释的:(i)养牛业扩张带来的社会经济效益;(ii)养牛业扩张和由此产生的森林砍伐带来的环境影响;最后(iii)从政策制定方面积极干预以规范养牛业扩张并尽量减少可能的不利影响的必要性程度。不同话语在这些领域的立场可以帮助政策制定者制定更广泛接受和遵循的措施和规定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/449e/11136858/1738b6231c64/267_2024_1957_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/449e/11136858/234db3942d31/267_2024_1957_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/449e/11136858/1738b6231c64/267_2024_1957_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/449e/11136858/234db3942d31/267_2024_1957_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/449e/11136858/1738b6231c64/267_2024_1957_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Livestock Frontier in the Paraguayan Chaco: A Local Agent-based Perspective.巴拉圭查科地区的畜牧业前沿:基于地方主体的视角。
Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;73(6):1231-1246. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01957-7. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
Land-use policies and corporate investments in agriculture in the Gran Chaco and Chiquitano.大查科地区和奇基塔诺地区的土地使用政策及农业领域的企业投资。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 12;113(15):4021-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602646113. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
3
Sustainable Cattle Ranching in Practice: Moving from Theory to Planning in Colombia's Livestock Sector.实践中的可持续养牛业:哥伦比亚畜牧业从理论到规划的转变
Environ Manage. 2017 Aug;60(2):176-184. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0902-8. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
4
Intensification of cattle ranching production systems: socioeconomic and environmental synergies and risks in Brazil.巴西养牛生产系统的集约化:社会经济与环境的协同效应和风险
Animal. 2014 Aug;8(8):1255-63. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114001566.
5
Carbon emissions from agricultural expansion and intensification in the Chaco.查科地区农业扩张和集约化导致的碳排放。
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 May;23(5):1902-1916. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13521. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
6
Export-oriented deforestation in Mato Grosso: harbinger or exception for other tropical forests?马托格罗索州面向出口的毁林:其他热带森林的先兆还是例外?
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Apr 22;368(1619):20120173. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0173. Print 2013 Jun 5.
7
South American Dry Chaco rangelands: Positive effects of cattle trampling and transit on ecohydrological functioning.南美洲干燥查科草原:牛群践踏和迁徙对生态水文功能的积极影响。
Ecol Appl. 2023 Apr;33(3):e2800. doi: 10.1002/eap.2800. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
8
Cattle ranching intensification in Brazil can reduce global greenhouse gas emissions by sparing land from deforestation.巴西的畜牧业集约化可以通过避免土地因砍伐森林而减少全球温室气体排放。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 20;111(20):7236-41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1307163111. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
9
Amazon deforestation: A dangerous future indicated by patterns and trajectories in a hotspot of forest destruction in Brazil.亚马逊森林砍伐:巴西森林破坏热点地区的模式和轨迹预示着危险的未来。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Mar;354:120354. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120354. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
10
Integration of qualitative and quantitative methods for land-use-change modeling in a deforestation frontier.定性与定量方法在森林砍伐前沿地区土地利用变化建模中的整合。
Conserv Biol. 2022 Dec;36(6):e13924. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13924. Epub 2022 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

1
When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research.何时以及如何使用 Q 方法论来理解保护研究中的观点。
Conserv Biol. 2018 Oct;32(5):1185-1194. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13123. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
2
Land-use policies and corporate investments in agriculture in the Gran Chaco and Chiquitano.大查科地区和奇基塔诺地区的土地使用政策及农业领域的企业投资。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 12;113(15):4021-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1602646113. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
3
CONSERVATION ECOLOGY. How can higher-yield farming help to spare nature?
保护生态学。高产农业如何有助于保护自然?
Science. 2016 Jan 29;351(6272):450-1. doi: 10.1126/science.aad0055.
4
Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management.利用认知作为证据来改善保护和环境管理。
Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):582-92. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12681. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
5
Post-crackdown effectiveness of field-based forest law enforcement in the Brazilian Amazon.巴西亚马逊地区实地森林执法打击行动后的成效
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0121544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121544. eCollection 2015.
6
Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains.通过公共政策和干预牛肉及大豆供应链来减缓亚马逊森林砍伐。
Science. 2014 Jun 6;344(6188):1118-23. doi: 10.1126/science.1248525.
7
Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production.减少森林砍伐的政策及其对农业生产的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19639-44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912014107. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
8
Changing drivers of deforestation and new opportunities for conservation.改变森林砍伐的驱动因素和保护的新机遇。
Conserv Biol. 2009 Dec;23(6):1396-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01332.x.
9
South America's neoliberal agricultural frontiers: places of environmental sacrifice or conservation opportunity?南美洲的新自由主义农业前沿:是环境牺牲之地还是保护机遇之所?
Ambio. 2009 May;38(3):141-9. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-38.3.141.
10
Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems: a new conservation paradigm.热带农业生态系统中的生物多样性保护:一种新的保护范式。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1134:173-200. doi: 10.1196/annals.1439.011.