• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更多是否总是更好?语义丰富度对词汇判断、快速发音和语义分类的影响。

Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, Block AS4, #02-07, Singapore, 117570, Republic of Singapore.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):742-50. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0092-y.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-011-0092-y
PMID:21494916
Abstract

Evidence from large-scale studies (Pexman, Hargreaves, Siakaluk, Bodner, & Pope, 2008) suggests that semantic richness, a multidimensional construct reflecting the extent of variability in the information associated with a word's meaning, facilitates visual word recognition. Specifically, recognition is better for words that (1) have more semantic neighbors, (2) possess referents with more features, and (3) are associated with more contexts. The present study extends Pexman et al. (2008) by examining how two additional measures of semantic richness, number of senses and number of associates (Pexman, Hargreaves, Edwards, Henry, & Goodyear, 2007), influence lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification performance, after controlling for an array of lexical and semantic variables. We found that number of features and contexts consistently facilitated word recognition but that the effects of semantic neighborhood density and number of associates were less robust. Words with more senses also elicited faster lexical decisions but less accurate semantic classifications. These findings point to how the effects of different semantic dimensions are selectively and adaptively modulated by task-specific demands.

摘要

来自大规模研究的证据(Pexman、Hargreaves、Siakaluk、Bodner 和 Pope,2008)表明,语义丰富度是一个多维结构,反映了与单词意义相关的信息的可变性程度,有助于视觉单词识别。具体来说,对于具有以下特征的单词,识别效果更好:(1) 具有更多语义邻居,(2) 具有更多特征的指称对象,以及 (3) 与更多上下文相关联。本研究通过检查另外两个语义丰富度的度量标准(意义数和联想数)(Pexman、Hargreaves、Edwards、Henry 和 Goodyear,2007),在控制了一系列词汇和语义变量后,如何影响词汇决策、快速发音和语义分类表现,扩展了 Pexman 等人的研究(2008)。我们发现,特征和上下文的数量一致地促进了单词识别,但语义邻居密度和联想数量的影响不太稳定。具有更多意义的单词也会引发更快的词汇决策,但语义分类的准确性较低。这些发现表明,不同语义维度的影响如何根据特定任务的需求进行有选择和适应性的调节。

相似文献

1
Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification.更多是否总是更好?语义丰富度对词汇判断、快速发音和语义分类的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):742-50. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0092-y.
2
An abundance of riches: cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition.丰富的资源:视觉单词识别中语义丰富性效应的跨任务比较
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 17;6:72. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00072. eCollection 2012.
3
There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.致富的方式有很多种:语义丰富度的三种度量对视觉单词识别的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):161-7. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.161.
4
Getting a grip on sensorimotor effects in lexical-semantic processing.把握词汇语义加工中的感觉运动效应。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):1-13. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1072-1.
5
Grasping the invisible: semantic processing of abstract words.抓住无形的:抽象词的语义处理。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Dec;20(6):1312-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0452-x.
6
Mapping semantic space: property norms and semantic richness.映射语义空间:属性规范与语义丰富度
Cogn Process. 2020 Nov;21(4):637-649. doi: 10.1007/s10339-019-00933-y. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
7
An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach.使用大规模研究方法对自由回忆和识别记忆中的词汇语义效应进行项目级分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Oct;71(10):2207-2222. doi: 10.1177/1747021817739834. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
8
Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.词汇判断中的语义丰富性效应:反馈的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Nov;43(8):1148-67. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0536-0.
9
Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.语义丰富性与衰老:词汇判断任务中特征数量的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Apr;45(2):359-65. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9352-8.
10
The role of semantic transparency in visual word recognition of compound words: A megastudy approach.复合词视觉词识别中语义透明度的作用:一项大规模研究方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2722-2732. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1143-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Specificity effect in concrete/abstract semantic categorization task.具体/抽象语义分类任务中的特异性效应
Cogn Process. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01286-5.
2
Semantic processing in older adults is associated with distributed neural activation which varies by association and abstractness of words.老年人的语义处理与分布的神经激活有关,这种激活因词汇的关联性和抽象性而异。
Geroscience. 2024 Dec;46(6):6195-6212. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01216-x. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Malay Lexicon Project 3: The impact of orthographic-semantic consistency on lexical decision latencies.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx.使用 HiDEx 探索词汇共现空间。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):393-413. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.393.
2
Tolerating ambiguity: ambiguous words recruit the left inferior frontal gyrus in absence of a behavioral effect.容忍歧义:在没有行为效应的情况下,歧义词语会激活左下额叶回。
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(1):19-30. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000062.
3
Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.
马来语词汇项目3:正字法-语义一致性对词汇判断潜伏期的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Mar 21;78(1):17470218241234668. doi: 10.1177/17470218241234668.
4
The Children and Young People's Books Lexicon (CYP-LEX): A large-scale lexical database of books read by children and young people in the United Kingdom.《儿童与青少年书籍词汇表》(CYP-LEX):一个大规模的词汇数据库,收录了英国儿童和青少年阅读的书籍。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec;77(12):2418-2438. doi: 10.1177/17470218241229694. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
5
Contextual diversity and anchoring: Null effects on learning word forms and opposing effects on learning word meanings.语境多样性与锚定:对单词形式学习无影响,对单词意义学习有相反影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov;77(11):2180-2198. doi: 10.1177/17470218231218990. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
6
Consensus Paper: Situated and Embodied Language Acquisition.共识文件:情境化与具身化语言习得
J Cogn. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):63. doi: 10.5334/joc.308. eCollection 2023.
7
Contextual diversity during word learning through reading benefits generalisation of learned meanings to new contexts.通过阅读在单词学习过程中引入语境多样性有利于将所学词义泛化到新的语境中。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jul;76(7):1658-1671. doi: 10.1177/17470218221126976. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
8
Word Frequency Effects in Naturalistic Reading.自然阅读中的词频效应
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(5):583-594. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1527376. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
9
Modeling the Structure and Dynamics of Semantic Processing.语义处理的结构与动态建模。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):2890-2917. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12690. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
10
Communicating abstract meaning: concepts revealed in words and gestures.传达抽象意义:词语和手势所揭示的概念。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0138.
超越库切拉和弗朗西斯:当前词频规范的批判性评估,以及美国英语新的、经过改进的词频衡量标准的引入。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977.
4
NoA's Ark: influence of the number of associates in visual word recognition.诺亚方舟:视觉单词识别中同伴数量的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Dec;15(6):1072-7. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1072.
5
Moving beyond Coltheart's N: a new measure of orthographic similarity.超越科尔特哈特的N:一种新的正字法相似性度量方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Oct;15(5):971-9. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971.
6
There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.致富的方式有很多种:语义丰富度的三种度量对视觉单词识别的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):161-7. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.161.
7
The English Lexicon Project.英语词汇项目
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59. doi: 10.3758/bf03193014.
8
The neural consequences of semantic richness: when more comes to mind, less activation is observed.语义丰富性的神经学后果:当更多内容浮现脑海时,观察到的激活反而更少。
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):401-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01913.x.
9
Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.视觉单词识别过程中感觉运动信息激活的证据:身体 - 物体交互效应。
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):433-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.011. Epub 2007 Jan 26.
10
Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times.上下文多样性而非词频决定单词命名和词汇判断时间。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):814-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x.