J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Feb;126(2):212. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000460.
Reports an error in "Handshaking promotes deal-making by signaling cooperative intent" by Juliana Schroeder, Jane L. Risen, Francesca Gino and Michael I. Norton (, 2019[May], Vol 116[5], 743-768). The sixth sentence in the abstract has been revised. Two new sentences have been added to the end of the Method subsection in Study 3. Data throughout the Results subsection in Study 3 have been updated. A new fourth paragraph in the Results subsection in Study 3 now appears. Figure 4 has been removed and all remaining figures and figure captions have been renumbered accordingly. Data in the Open Information Exchange subsection of the Appendix, Study 3, have been updated. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-63408-001.) We examine how a simple handshake-a gesture that often occurs at the outset of social interactions-can influence deal-making. Because handshakes are social rituals, they are imbued with meaning beyond their physical features. We propose that during mixed-motive interactions, a handshake is viewed as a signal of cooperative intent, increasing people's cooperative behavior and affecting deal-making outcomes. In Studies 1a and 1b, pairs who chose to shake hands at the onset of integrative negotiations obtained better joint outcomes. Study 2 demonstrates the causal impact of handshaking using experimental methodology. Study 3 suggests a driver of the cooperative consequence of handshaking: negotiators expected partners who shook hands to behave more cooperatively than partners who avoided shaking hands or partners whose nonverbal behavior was unknown. Study 4 uses an economic game to demonstrate that handshaking increased cooperation even when handshakes were uninstructed (vs. instructed). Further demonstrating the primacy of signaling cooperative intent, handshaking actually reduced cooperation when the action signaled ill intent (e.g., when the hand-shaker was sick; Study 5). Finally, in Study 6, executives assigned to shake hands before a more antagonistic, distributive negotiation were less likely to lie about self-benefiting information, increasing cooperation even to their own detriment. Together, these studies provide evidence that handshakes, ritualistic behaviors imbued with meaning beyond mere physical contact, signal cooperative intent and promote deal-making. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
报告朱莉安娜·施罗德、简·L·里森、弗朗西斯卡·吉诺和迈克尔·I·诺顿所著的《握手通过传递合作意图促进交易达成》(《美国国家科学院院刊》,2019年[5月],第116卷[5],第743 - 768页)中的一处错误。摘要的第六句话已修订。研究3的“方法”子部分末尾新增了两句话。研究3的“结果”子部分中的所有数据已更新。研究3的“结果”子部分新增了一段新的第四段。图4已移除,所有其余图表及图表标题已相应重新编号。附录中研究3的“开放信息交流”子部分的数据已更新。本文的网络版已校正。(原始文章的以下摘要出现在记录2018 - 63408 - 001中。)我们研究了一种简单的握手——一种常在社交互动开始时出现的手势——如何影响交易达成。由于握手是社交仪式,它们所蕴含的意义超越了其物理特征。我们提出,在混合动机互动中,握手被视为合作意图的信号,会增加人们的合作行为并影响交易达成结果。在研究1a和1b中,在综合谈判开始时选择握手的双方取得了更好的联合结果。研究2使用实验方法证明了握手的因果影响。研究3提出了握手合作结果的一个驱动因素:谈判者预计握手的伙伴比避免握手的伙伴或非言语行为未知的伙伴表现得更合作。研究4使用经济博弈证明,即使握手是无指导的(与有指导的相比),握手也会增加合作。进一步证明了传递合作意图的首要性,当握手传递恶意意图时(例如,握手者生病时),握手实际上会减少合作(研究5)。最后,在研究6中,被分配在更具对抗性的分配性谈判前握手的高管不太可能就利己信息说谎,即使对自身不利也会增加合作。总之,这些研究提供了证据,表明握手这种超越单纯身体接触而蕴含意义的仪式行为,传递了合作意图并促进了交易达成。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)