Departamento de Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências e Comportamento, Depto. Psicologia Experimental, Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes, 1721, 05508-030, São Paulo, Brasil.
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 11;44(1):127. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03056-2.
We aimed the develop and validate a computerized version of the MNREAD for the assessment of reading speed for children.
A computerized version of the MNREAD was built in Psykinematix software using the same parameters as the physical chart. We measured the reading velocity of 104 children (n = 44 of the 3rd grade; n = 60 of the 5th grade). Bland-Altaman analysis was used to quantify agreement between two chart measurements.
Comparison between the 3rd and 5th-grade children for physical and computerized MNREAD versions showed statistical differences in Maximum Reading Speed (F = 2669.6; p < 0.001), Critical Print Size (F = 17.49; p < 0.001), and Reading Acuity (F = 14.19; p = 0.002) with huge effect size (η = 0.930). No differences were found between the versions within grades. Bland-Altman analysis showed 95% of the data points within ± 2 s of the mean difference, suggesting a similarity between versions of the MNREAD parameters.
Our reading speed values for children in the 5th grade were higher than previous studies, suggesting a better quality of the assessment in the computerized version. Tolerance Limits were calculated as normality references for clinical purposes.
我们旨在开发和验证 MNREAD 的计算机版本,用于评估儿童的阅读速度。
在 Psykinematix 软件中构建了 MNREAD 的计算机版本,使用与物理图表相同的参数。我们测量了 104 名儿童(n=44 名 3 年级;n=60 名 5 年级)的阅读速度。 Bland-Altman 分析用于量化两种图表测量之间的一致性。
物理和计算机化 MNREAD 版本的 3 年级和 5 年级儿童之间的比较显示,最大阅读速度(F=2669.6;p<0.001)、临界打印大小(F=17.49;p<0.001)和阅读敏锐度(F=14.19;p=0.002)存在统计学差异,具有巨大的效应大小(η=0.930)。在同一年级内,两个版本之间没有差异。Bland-Altman 分析显示,95%的数据点在平均差异的±2s 内,表明 MNREAD 参数的两个版本之间存在相似性。
我们对 5 年级儿童的阅读速度值高于以前的研究,表明计算机化版本的评估质量更好。容限限值作为临床目的的正态性参考进行计算。