Dave Udit, Rubin Jared, Chang Nicole, Bi Andrew S, Atkins Myles, Gómez-Verdejo Fernando, Verma Nikhil N, Chahla Jorge
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Orthop. 2025 Jan 17;66:146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.01.011. eCollection 2025 Aug.
The patellar tendon plays a crucial role in knee extension and lower extremity mobility. Although PT ruptures are rare, they result in severe loss of function when untreated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes and complications following primary, acute patellar tendon (PT) repair.
In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched in August 2024 for studies published after 2004. Studies were included if they met these criteria: evaluated patients who underwent acute PT repair with any technique including for mid-substance tear or avulsion, were prospective or retrospective studies, and reported functional outcomes or complications. Studies not written in English were excluded.
The initial screen identified 1737 studies, 9 of which were included in this systematic review. There were three retrospective cohort studies, three retrospective case series, one retrospective case control study, and two prospective case series. Each study had low risk of bias. A total of 970 patients (93.8 % males) were included. Mean age across studies ranged from 32.1 to 44.6 years. Five included studies reported on mean extension at follow-up, ranging from 0 to 6.4 degrees of extension. Five included studies reported on mean flexion at follow-up, ranging from 128.5 to 143.3 degrees of flexion. The range of re-rupture and re-operation were 0-21.4 % with an overall re-rupture rate of 3.9 % and an overall re-operation rate of 5.7 %. Only one study reported a significant difference in re-rupture rates with transosseous repair versus suture anchor repair (7.5 % versus 0 % respectively). Other complications identified were venous thromboembolism (VTE) (0-5.0 %), stiffness (0-35.0 %), hardware discomfort (0-5.0 %), and infection (0-5.0 %).
Patellar tendon repair with both transosseous and suture anchor technique restores range of motion in patients post-operatively with a low complication rate. Decisions regarding operative technique should be tailored to individual patient characteristics and surgeon preferences.
Level IV, systematic review of level III-IV studies.
髌腱在膝关节伸展和下肢活动中起着关键作用。尽管髌腱断裂很少见,但如果不治疗,会导致严重的功能丧失。本研究的目的是评估一期急性髌腱(PT)修复后的临床、功能结局及并发症。
按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,于2024年8月在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中检索2004年后发表的研究。符合以下标准的研究纳入本研究:评估采用任何技术(包括中段撕裂或撕脱)进行急性PT修复的患者,为前瞻性或回顾性研究,并报告功能结局或并发症。排除非英文撰写的研究。
初步筛选确定了1737项研究,其中9项纳入本系统评价。有三项回顾性队列研究、三项回顾性病例系列研究、一项回顾性病例对照研究和两项前瞻性病例系列研究。每项研究的偏倚风险均较低。共纳入970例患者(93.8%为男性)。各研究的平均年龄在32.1至44.6岁之间。五项纳入研究报告了随访时的平均伸展度,范围为0至6.4度伸展。五项纳入研究报告了随访时的平均屈曲度,范围为128.5至143.3度屈曲。再断裂和再次手术的发生率范围为0 - 21.4%,总体再断裂率为3.9%,总体再次手术率为5.7%。只有一项研究报告了经骨修复与缝线锚钉修复的再断裂率存在显著差异(分别为7.5%和0%)。确定的其他并发症包括静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)(0 - 5.0%)、僵硬(0 - 35.0%)、内植物不适(0 - 5.0%)和感染(0 - 5.0%)。
经骨和缝线锚钉技术修复髌腱术后可恢复患者的活动范围,并发症发生率低。手术技术的选择应根据患者个体特征和外科医生的偏好进行调整。
IV级,III - IV级研究的系统评价。