Bampidis Vasileios, Azimonti Giovanna, Bastos Maria de Lourdes, Christensen Henrik, Durjava Mojca, Dusemund Birgit, Kouba Maryline, López-Alonso Marta, López Puente Secundino, Marcon Francesca, Mayo Baltasar, Pechová Alena, Petkova Mariana, Ramos Fernando, Villa Roberto Edoardo, Woutersen Ruud, Galobart Jaume, Holczknecht Orsolya, Innocenti Matteo Lorenzo, Manini Paola, Radovnikovic Anita, Pizzo Fabiola, Vettori Maria Vittoria, Amaduzzi Angelica
EFSA J. 2024 Mar 11;22(3):e8644. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8644. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of sodium bisulphate (SBS) as a feed additive for all terrestrial animal species (category: technological additive; functional group: preservative), and for all terrestrial animal species other than cats, mink, pets and other non-food-producing animals (category: technological additive; functional group: acidity regulator). EFSA has also been asked to assess the new use of the product as an acidity regulator and flavouring compound in all pets and other non-food-producing animals except aquatic animals. The applicant provided evidence that the additive currently in the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. There is no evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the Panel concluded that the additive remains safe for all terrestrial animal species, consumer and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. The FEEDAP Panel considers that the proposed new use would not introduce risks not already considered in the previous assessment and therefore the same conclusions on all terrestrial animal species, consumers of products from animals fed the additive and the environment would apply. Regarding user safety, the additive is irritant to the skin, eyes and the respiratory tract, and should be considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. There is no need to assess the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation. The Panel considers that the additive has the potential to be efficacious as an acidity regulator and sensory additive (flavouring compound) in feed for pet and non-food-producing animals (except aquatic animals).
应欧盟委员会的要求,欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)被要求就以下事项提供科学意见:对亚硫酸氢钠(SBS)作为所有陆生动物物种饲料添加剂(类别:技术添加剂;功能组:防腐剂)以及猫、貂、宠物和其他非食用动物以外的所有陆生动物物种饲料添加剂(类别:技术添加剂;功能组:酸度调节剂)的授权续展申请进行评估。EFSA还被要求评估该产品在所有宠物和除水生动物外的其他非食用动物中作为酸度调节剂和调味剂的新用途。申请人提供了证据,证明市场上现有的该添加剂符合现行授权条件。没有证据会导致饲料添加剂和动物营养产品委员会(FEEDAP小组)重新考虑其先前的结论。因此,该小组得出结论,在授权使用条件下,该添加剂对所有陆生动物物种、消费者和环境仍然是安全的。FEEDAP小组认为,拟议的新用途不会引入先前评估中未考虑的风险,因此,对于所有陆生动物物种、食用添加该添加剂的动物产品的消费者以及环境,将适用相同的结论。关于使用者安全,该添加剂对皮肤、眼睛和呼吸道有刺激性,应被视为皮肤和呼吸道致敏剂。在授权续展的背景下,无需评估该添加剂的功效。该小组认为,该添加剂有潜力在宠物和非食用动物(水生动物除外)饲料中作为酸度调节剂和感官添加剂(调味剂)发挥作用。