Miniati Mario, Lippi Maria, Palagini Laura, Conversano Ciro, Orrù Graziella, Gemignani Angelo, Perugi Giulio
Psychiatric Clinic, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 4;12(5):586. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12050586.
We investigated if interoceptive deficits could be the link between alexithymic traits and eating spectrum manifestations in a non-clinical sample. One-hundred sixty-one young adults (mean age: 23.2 ± 2.4 years) were evaluated with the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20), the Interoceptive Accuracy Scale (IAS), the Interoceptive Confusion Questionnaire (ICQ), and the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26). Questionnaires were administered with an online procedure (Microsoft Form, Office 365 A1, Pisa, Italy) (Study Protocol #0012005/2023). We compared ICQ, IAS, and TAS-20 scores in subjects who met the threshold for a potential eating spectrum disorder according to EAT-26 scores ≥ 20 ( = 27) vs. subjects who scored <20 ( = 134), with an ANCOVA corrected for 'age' and 'gender'. Subjects with EAT-26 ≥ 20, scored significantly higher at ICQ (54.4 ± 13.2 vs. 50.2 ± 6.8; = 0.011), TAS-20 'Total Score' (60.8 ± 11.9 vs. 58.1 ± 9.2; = 0.006), and TAS-20 'Identifying Feelings' (21.5 ± 7.6 vs. 17.3 ± 5.8; = 0.0001). A binary logistic regression analysis, with EAT-26 scores < 20 vs. ≥20 as the dependent variable, and ICQ, IAS, TAS-20 total scores and dimensions, age, and gender (categorical) as covariates, showed that the only variable predicting eating spectrum symptomatology was 'ICQ Total Score' (OR = 1.075, 95% CI: 1.016-1.139; = 0.013). Interoceptive confusion was the dimension linking the occurrence of alexithymic traits and eating spectrum manifestations.
我们研究了在一个非临床样本中,内感受性缺陷是否可能是述情障碍特质与饮食谱表现之间的联系。对161名年轻人(平均年龄:23.2±2.4岁)进行了多伦多述情障碍量表-20(TAS-20)、内感受准确性量表(IAS)、内感受混淆问卷(ICQ)和饮食态度测试-26(EAT-26)评估。问卷通过在线程序(Microsoft Form,Office 365 A1,意大利比萨)发放(研究方案#0012005/2023)。根据EAT-26得分≥20(n = 27)与得分<20(n = 134),将符合潜在饮食谱障碍阈值的受试者与得分较低的受试者进行比较,采用协方差分析并对“年龄”和“性别”进行校正。EAT-26≥20的受试者在ICQ上得分显著更高(54.4±13.2对50.2±6.8;p = 0.011),TAS-20“总分”(60.8±11.9对58.1±9.2;p = 0.006),以及TAS-20“识别情感”(21.5±7.6对17.3±5.8;p = 0.0001)。以EAT-26得分<20与≥20作为因变量,ICQ、IAS、TAS-20总分及维度、年龄和性别(分类变量)作为协变量进行二元逻辑回归分析,结果显示唯一预测饮食谱症状的变量是“ICQ总分”(OR = 1.075,95%CI:1.016 - 1.139;p = 0.013)。内感受混淆是连接述情障碍特质的出现与饮食谱表现的维度。