Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.
Departments of Medicine, Pharmacology, and Biomedical Informatics Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville TN.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):e031029. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031029. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
Recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains common. We evaluated the association between recurrence and levels of biomarkers of cardiac remodeling, and their ability to improve recurrence prediction when added to a clinical prediction model.
Blood samples collected before de novo catheter ablation were analyzed. Levels of bone morphogenetic protein-10, angiopoietin-2, fibroblast growth factor-23, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7, myosin-binding protein C3, growth differentiation factor-15, interleukin-6, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and high-sensitivity troponin T were measured. Recurrence was defined as ≥30 seconds of an atrial arrhythmia 3 to 12 months postablation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using biomarker levels along with clinical covariates: APPLE score (Age >65 years, Persistent AF, imPaired eGFR [<60 ml/min/1.73m], LA diameter ≥43 mm, EF <50%; which includes age, left atrial diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, persistent atrial fibrillation, and estimated glomerular filtration rate), preablation rhythm, sex, height, body mass index, presence of an implanted continuous monitor, year of ablation, and additional linear ablation. A total of 1873 participants were included. A multivariable logistic regression showed an association between recurrence and levels of angiopoietin-2 (odds ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.15], =0.007) and interleukin-6 (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.003-1.03]; =0.02). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of a model that only contained clinical predictors was 0.711. The addition of any of the 9 studied biomarkers to the predictive model did not result in a statistically significant improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Higher angiopoietin-2 and interleukin-6 levels were associated with recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation in multivariable modeling. However, the addition of biomarkers to a clinical prediction model did not significantly improve recurrence prediction.
心房颤动(AF)消融后复发仍然很常见。我们评估了复发与心脏重构生物标志物水平之间的关系,以及当将其添加到临床预测模型中时,它们对改善复发预测的能力。
分析了新导管消融前采集的血液样本。测量了骨形态发生蛋白-10、血管生成素-2、成纤维细胞生长因子-23、胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白-7、肌球蛋白结合蛋白 C3、生长分化因子-15、白细胞介素-6、N 末端脑钠肽前体和高敏肌钙蛋白 T 的水平。复发定义为消融后 3 至 12 个月的心房心律失常≥30 秒。使用生物标志物水平和临床协变量(APPLE 评分(年龄>65 岁,持续性 AF,eGFR 降低[<60ml/min/1.73m],LA 直径≥43mm,EF<50%;包括年龄、左心房直径、左心室射血分数、持续性心房颤动和估计肾小球滤过率)、消融前节律、性别、身高、体重指数、植入式连续监测器的存在、消融年份和附加线性消融)进行多变量逻辑回归。共纳入 1873 名参与者。多变量逻辑回归显示,复发与血管生成素-2(比值比,1.08[95%CI,1.02-1.15],=0.007)和白细胞介素-6(比值比,1.02[95%CI,1.003-1.03];=0.02)水平之间存在关联。仅包含临床预测因子的模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.711。将研究中的 9 种生物标志物中的任何一种添加到预测模型中,均未导致接收者操作特征曲线下面积的统计学显著改善。
多变量模型中,较高的血管生成素-2 和白细胞介素-6 水平与心房颤动消融后复发相关。然而,将生物标志物添加到临床预测模型中并不能显著改善复发预测。