• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习技术预测导管消融术后心房颤动的早期复发

Predicting Early recurrence of atrial fibrilation post-catheter ablation using machine learning techniques.

作者信息

Askarinejad Amir, Sabahizadeh Amirreza, Kohansal Erfan, Ghasemi Zahra, Haghjoo Majid

机构信息

Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Institute, Iran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.

School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04367-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-024-04367-z
PMID:39702028
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11657212/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is a common treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), but recurrence rates remain variable. Predicting the success of catheter ablation is crucial for patient selection and management. This research seeks to create a machine learning model to forecast the early recurrence of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted using data from the Iranian AF registry. The dataset included 402 consecutive AF patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. The primary outcome was early recurrence of AF within 3 months' post-ablation. Data preprocessing and feature selection were performed, followed by the development and evaluation of various machine learning models. The CatBoost model was selected as the best-performing model.

RESULTS

The study population had a mean age of 57.30 ± 14.05 years, and 61.4% were male. AF recurrence occurred in 26.1% of patients. The CatBoost model, utilizing 35 features, achieved an accuracy of 92.5% in predicting AF recurrence. The model demonstrated high sensitivity (88.6%) and specificity (94.0%), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.96. Paroxysmal AF, BUN, Cr, age, mitral regurgitation, LA velocity, and mild valvular heart disease were among the most important predictive features.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning methods, particularly the CatBoost model, demonstrate high accuracy in predicting early catheter ablation outcomes in AF patients. The developed model has the potential to improve patient care and decision-making by identifying patients most likely to benefit from the procedure. Further studies with larger sample sizes and external validation are warranted to assess the generalizability of this method for catheter ablation outcome prediction in AF patients.

摘要

背景

导管消融是心房颤动(AF)的一种常见治疗方法,但复发率仍存在差异。预测导管消融的成功率对于患者的选择和管理至关重要。本研究旨在创建一个机器学习模型,以预测导管消融后心房颤动的早期复发。

方法

使用来自伊朗房颤登记处的数据进行了一项前瞻性纵向研究。该数据集包括402例连续接受射频导管消融的房颤患者。主要结局是消融后3个月内心房颤动的早期复发。进行了数据预处理和特征选择,随后开发并评估了各种机器学习模型。选择CatBoost模型作为表现最佳的模型。

结果

研究人群的平均年龄为57.30±14.05岁,男性占61.4%。26.1%的患者发生了房颤复发。利用35个特征的CatBoost模型在预测房颤复发方面的准确率达到了92.5%。该模型表现出高敏感性(88.6%)和特异性(94.0%),ROC曲线下面积为0.96。阵发性房颤、血尿素氮、肌酐、年龄、二尖瓣反流、左房速度和轻度瓣膜性心脏病是最重要的预测特征。

结论

机器学习方法,尤其是CatBoost模型,在预测房颤患者导管消融早期结局方面具有很高的准确性。所开发的模型有可能通过识别最有可能从该手术中获益的患者来改善患者护理和决策。有必要进行更大样本量的进一步研究和外部验证,以评估该方法在房颤患者导管消融结局预测中的通用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8056/11657212/e7013ac79686/12872_2024_4367_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8056/11657212/c8f5d144eda6/12872_2024_4367_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8056/11657212/e7013ac79686/12872_2024_4367_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8056/11657212/c8f5d144eda6/12872_2024_4367_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8056/11657212/e7013ac79686/12872_2024_4367_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting Early recurrence of atrial fibrilation post-catheter ablation using machine learning techniques.使用机器学习技术预测导管消融术后心房颤动的早期复发
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04367-z.
2
Development and validation of a risk score for predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after a first catheter ablation procedure - ATLAS score.开发并验证了一种用于预测首次导管消融术后心房颤动复发的风险评分 - ATLAS 评分。
Europace. 2018 Nov 1;20(FI_3):f428-f435. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux265.
3
Explainable machine learning model reveals its decision-making process in identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation at high risk for recurrence after catheter ablation.可解释机器学习模型揭示了其在识别导管消融后阵发性心房颤动高复发风险患者时的决策过程。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Feb 17;23(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03087-0.
4
CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of left atrial ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.CHADS2 和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分作为预测阵发性心房颤动左心房消融结局的指标。
Europace. 2014 Feb;16(2):202-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut210. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
5
Left Atrial Wall Thickness Measured by a Machine Learning Method Predicts AF Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation.通过机器学习方法测量的左心房壁厚度可预测肺静脉隔离术后房颤复发。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Feb;36(2):323-330. doi: 10.1111/jce.16515. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
6
Renal function and outcomes after catheter ablation of patients with atrial fibrillation: The Guangzhou atrial fibrillation ablation registry.肾功和房颤导管消融患者的预后:广州房颤消融登记研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jun-Jul;112(6-7):420-429. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 May 25.
7
Machine Learning-Driven Identification of Distinct Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Phenotypes: A Cluster Analysis of DECAAF II.机器学习驱动的不同持续性房颤表型识别:DECAAF II的聚类分析
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Feb;36(2):457-466. doi: 10.1111/jce.16554. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
8
Multimodal data-based longitudinal prognostic model for predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with patent foramen ovale and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.基于多模态数据的纵向预后模型,用于预测卵圆孔未闭合并阵发性心房颤动患者导管消融术后心房颤动复发情况
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Jan 20;30(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02286-z.
9
Very late arrhythmia recurrences in patients with sinus rhythm within the first year after catheter ablation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry.心脏中心房颤导管消融注册研究:窦性心律患者导管消融术后 1 年内极晚期心律失常复发。
Europace. 2019 Nov 1;21(11):1646-1652. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz233.
10
Sex-related risks of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after ablation: Insights from the Guangzhou Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Registry.消融术后心房颤动复发的性别相关风险:来自广州心房颤动消融登记研究的启示。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Mar;112(3):171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2018.10.006. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器学习对导管消融术后心房颤动复发的预测价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 16;24(11):315. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2411315. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
Recurrence After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Investigational Biomarkers of Cardiac Remodeling.心房颤动消融后的复发和心脏重构的研究生物标志物。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):e031029. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031029. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
3
Development and Validation of a Novel Prognostic Tool to Predict Recurrence of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation after the First-Time Catheter Ablation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
一种预测首次导管消融术后阵发性心房颤动复发的新型预后工具的开发与验证:一项回顾性队列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Mar 22;13(6):1207. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061207.
4
Machine Learning-Enabled Multimodal Fusion of Intra-Atrial and Body Surface Signals in Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes.机器学习赋能的心房内和体表信号的多模态融合在预测心房颤动消融结果中的应用。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022 Aug;15(8):e010850. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.122.010850. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
5
Deep Learning-Based Recurrence Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation.基于深度学习的导管消融术后房颤复发预测
Circ J. 2022 Jan 25;86(2):299-308. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-21-0622. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
6
Reinforcement Learning to Improve Image-Guidance of Ablation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation.强化学习改善心房颤动消融治疗的图像引导
Front Physiol. 2021 Aug 25;12:733139. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.733139. eCollection 2021.
7
Catheter ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drugs as 'first-line' initial therapy for atrial fibrillation: a pooled analysis of randomized data.导管消融与抗心律失常药物作为心房颤动“一线”初始治疗的比较:随机数据的汇总分析
Europace. 2021 Dec 7;23(12):1950-1960. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab185.
8
The Clinical Application of the Deep Learning Technique for Predicting Trigger Origins in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With Catheter Ablation.深度学习技术在导管消融阵发性心房颤动患者触发灶预测中的临床应用。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Nov;13(11):e008518. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008518. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
9
Predicting recurrent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a systematic review of prognostic models.预测导管消融后心房颤动复发:预后模型的系统评价。
Europace. 2020 May 1;22(5):748-760. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa041.
10
Cabins, castles, and constant hearts: rhythm control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation.小屋、城堡和不变的心:心房颤动患者的节律控制治疗。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Dec 7;40(46):3793-3799c. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz782.