Tarasiuk Grzegorz, Remmenga Marta D, O'Hara Kathleen C, Talbert Marian K, Rotolo Marisa L, Zaabel Pam, Zhang Danyang, Giménez-Lirola Luis G, Zimmerman Jeffrey J
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
USDA: VS: Strategy and Policy, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;14(5):766. doi: 10.3390/ani14050766.
Laboratory methods for detecting specific pathogens in oral fluids are widely reported, but there is little research on the oral fluid sampling process itself. In this study, a fluorescent tracer (diluted red food coloring) was used to test the transfer of a target directly from pigs or indirectly from the environment to pen-based oral fluid samples. Pens of ~30, ~60, and ~125 14-week-old pigs (32 pens/size) on commercial swine farms received one of two treatments: (1) pig exposure, i.e., ~3.5 mL of tracer solution sprayed into the mouth of 10% of the pigs in the pen; (2) environmental exposure, i.e., 20 mL of tracer solution was poured on the floor in the center of the pen. Oral fluids collected one day prior to treatment (baseline fluorescence control) and immediately after treatment were tested for fluorescence. Data were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with Youden's J statistic used to set a threshold. Pretreatment oral fluid samples with fluorescence responses above the ROC threshold were removed from further analysis (7 of 96 samples). Based on the ROC analyses, oral fluid samples from 78 of 89 pens (87.6%), contained red food coloring, including 43 of 47 (91.5%) pens receiving pig exposure and 35 of 42 (83.3%) pens receiving environmental exposure. Thus, oral fluid samples contain both pig-derived and environmental targets. This methodology provides a safe and quantifiable method to evaluate oral fluid sampling vis-à-vis pen behavior, pen size, sampling protocol, and target distribution in the pen.
检测口腔液中特定病原体的实验室方法已有广泛报道,但对于口腔液采样过程本身的研究却很少。在本研究中,使用了一种荧光示踪剂(稀释的红色食用色素)来测试目标物直接从猪身上或间接从环境转移到基于围栏的口腔液样本中的情况。商业养猪场中,分别有大约30头、60头和125头14周龄的猪(每种规模32个围栏)接受了两种处理之一:(1)猪暴露,即向围栏中10%的猪口腔内喷洒约3.5 mL示踪剂溶液;(2)环境暴露,即向围栏中央的地面倒入20 mL示踪剂溶液。在处理前一天采集的口腔液(基线荧光对照)和处理后立即采集的口腔液进行了荧光检测。数据通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析进行评估,使用尤登指数(Youden's J statistic)设定阈值。荧光反应高于ROC阈值的预处理口腔液样本被排除在进一步分析之外(96个样本中有7个)。基于ROC分析,89个围栏中的78个(87.6%)的口腔液样本含有红色食用色素,其中接受猪暴露的47个围栏中有43个(91.5%),接受环境暴露的42个围栏中有35个(83.3%)。因此,口腔液样本既含有来自猪的目标物,也含有来自环境的目标物。这种方法提供了一种安全且可量化的方法,用于评估与围栏行为、围栏大小、采样方案以及围栏内目标物分布相关的口腔液采样情况。