Hutchings Hollis, Behinaein Parnia, Enofe Nosayaba, Brue Kellie, Tam Samantha, Chang Steven, Movsas Benjamin, Poisson Laila, Wang Anqi, Okereke Ikenna
Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;16(5):1015. doi: 10.3390/cancers16051015.
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores have been utilized more frequently, but the relationship of PRO scores to determinants of health and social inequities has not been widely studied. Our goal was to determine the association of PRO scores with social determinants. All patients with a new cancer diagnosis who completed a PRO survey from 2020 to 2022 were included. The PRO survey recorded scores for depression, fatigue, pain interference and physical function. Higher depression, fatigue and pain scores indicated more distress. Higher physical condition scores indicated improved functionality. A total of 1090 patients were included. Married patients had significantly better individual PRO scores for each domain. Patients who were able to use the online portal to complete their survey also had better individual scores. Male patients and non-White patients had worse pain scores than female and White patients, respectively. Patients with prostate cancer had the best scores while patients with head and neck and lung cancer had the worst scores. PRO scores varied by cancer disease site and stage. Social support may act in combination with specific patient/tumor factors to influence PRO scores. These findings present opportunities to address patient support at institutional levels.
患者报告结局(PRO)评分的使用频率越来越高,但PRO评分与健康决定因素及社会不平等之间的关系尚未得到广泛研究。我们的目标是确定PRO评分与社会决定因素之间的关联。纳入了所有在2020年至2022年期间完成PRO调查的新发癌症诊断患者。PRO调查记录了抑郁、疲劳、疼痛干扰和身体功能的评分。抑郁、疲劳和疼痛评分越高表明痛苦越多。身体状况评分越高表明功能改善。共纳入1090例患者。已婚患者在每个领域的个体PRO评分显著更好。能够使用在线门户完成调查的患者个体评分也更好。男性患者和非白人患者的疼痛评分分别比女性和白人患者更差。前列腺癌患者评分最佳,而头颈癌和肺癌患者评分最差。PRO评分因癌症疾病部位和分期而异。社会支持可能与特定的患者/肿瘤因素共同作用以影响PRO评分。这些发现为在机构层面解决患者支持问题提供了机会。