Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜腹膜内植入补片修补术(IPOM)与腹腔镜IPOM-Plus修补术的比较:我们在巴基斯坦的初步经验。

Comparison of Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) Hernioplasty With Laparoscopic IPOM-Plus: Our Initial Experience in Pakistan.

作者信息

Yasin Fahad, Abaid Ali, Shafiq Ahsan, Umar Muhammad, Khan Wasim Hayat, Ayyaz Mahmood, Butt Usman Ismat

机构信息

Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.

General Surgery, Shalamar Medical and Dental College, Lahore, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Feb 11;16(2):e54007. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54007. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives Laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh hernioplasty (IPOM) for ventral hernias has been used for a long time. However, there have been some issues associated with it, thereby leading to the introduction of a new technique that involves laparoscopic closure of the fascial defect with suture followed by intraperitoneal onlay mesh placement (IPOM-Plus). We carried out this study to compare the outcome of laparoscopic IPOM with fascial defect closure versus without defect closure in midline ventral hernia repair in terms of recurrence. Methodology This comparative study was carried out in the Department of Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, from October 16, 2020, to April 15, 2022. A total of 84 patients of both genders, aged between 18 and 70 years, presenting with midline ventral hernia were included in the study. Patients with recurrent hernia, unstable cardiopulmonary conditions, neurological or psychiatric diseases, chronic renal disease, congestive cardiac failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were excluded from the study. Patients were assigned to two groups. Group 1 underwent IPOM with the closure of the defect, and Group 2 underwent IPOM without the closure of the defect. Patients were observed for immediate postoperative complications. Patients were monitored for one year to assess recurrence through clinical evaluation and ultrasonography. Results In this study, seroma formation was found in 3 (7.14%) patients for laparoscopic IPOM with fascial defect closure and 10 (23.81%) in those undergoing laparoscopic IPOM without defect closure (-value = 0.035). Recurrence was identified in 2 (4.76%) patients undergoing laparoscopic IPOM with fascial defect closure and 9 (21.43%) in those undergoing laparoscopic IPOM without defect closure (-value = 0.024). Conclusions This study concluded that the frequency of recurrence is less after laparoscopic IPOM with fascial defect closure in midline ventral hernia repair than after laparoscopic IPOM without fascial defect closure.

摘要

目的 腹腔镜腹腔内补片植入修补术(IPOM)用于腹疝修补已有很长时间。然而,该方法存在一些相关问题,因此引入了一种新技术,即腹腔镜下用缝线闭合筋膜缺损,随后进行腹腔内补片植入(IPOM-Plus)。我们开展本研究以比较腹腔镜IPOM在中线腹疝修补中,筋膜缺损闭合与未闭合情况下的复发结局。方法 本比较研究于2020年10月16日至2022年4月15日在拉合尔服务医院外科进行。纳入研究的共有84例年龄在18至70岁之间的中线腹疝患者,男女不限。复发性疝患者、心肺状况不稳定者、神经或精神疾病患者、慢性肾病患者、充血性心力衰竭患者以及慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者被排除在研究之外。患者被分为两组。第1组接受有缺损闭合的IPOM,第2组接受无缺损闭合的IPOM。观察患者术后即刻并发症情况。对患者进行一年的监测,通过临床评估和超声检查评估复发情况。结果 在本研究中,腹腔镜IPOM且有筋膜缺损闭合的患者中有3例(7.14%)出现血清肿形成,而腹腔镜IPOM无缺损闭合的患者中有10例(23.81%)出现血清肿形成(P值 = 0.035)。腹腔镜IPOM且有筋膜缺损闭合的患者中有2例(4.76%)复发,而腹腔镜IPOM无缺损闭合的患者中有9例(21.43%)复发(P值 = 0.024)。结论 本研究得出结论,在中线腹疝修补中,腹腔镜IPOM有筋膜缺损闭合后的复发频率低于腹腔镜IPOM无筋膜缺损闭合后的复发频率。

相似文献

6
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging.
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):635-646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
A novel alternative to suture passer for closure of fascial defect in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. A case report.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;60:276-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.06.045. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
9
Outcomes of bridging versus mesh augmentation in laparoscopic repair of small and medium midline ventral hernias.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):382-388. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4984-9. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
10
Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2055-2067. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03105-w. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Laparoscopic eTEP-RS/TAR and IPOM Techniques for Ventral Hernia Repair.
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Apr 25;4:14176. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14176. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

2
Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair using intraperitoneal onlay mesh with peritoneal bridging.
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):635-646. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02502-9. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
4
Prevalence and risk factors for abdominal wall hernia in the general Russian population.
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1237-1242. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01971-3. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
Should We Routinely Close the Fascial Defect in Laparoscopic Ventral and Incisional Hernia Repair?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jun;29(6):856-859. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0088. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hernia. 2017 Dec;21(6):905-916. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1683-y. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
7
Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair.
Br J Surg. 2016 Nov;103(12):1598-1607. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10268. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
8
SAGES guidelines for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3163-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5072-x. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
9
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure versus bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3231-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4644-5. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
10
Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair: longitudinal outcomes and cost analysis using statewide claims data.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Mar;30(3):906-15. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4310-y. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验