• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估 ChatGPT 在盆底手术咨询中的应用。

Evaluation of ChatGPT for Pelvic Floor Surgery Counseling.

机构信息

From the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Department of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA.

出版信息

Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Mar 1;30(3):245-250. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001459.

DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001459
PMID:38484238
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Large language models are artificial intelligence applications that can comprehend and produce human-like text and language. ChatGPT is one such model. Recent advances have increased interest in the utility of large language models in medicine. Urogynecology counseling is complex and time-consuming. Therefore, we evaluated ChatGPT as a potential adjunct for patient counseling.

OBJECTIVE

Our primary objective was to compare the accuracy and completeness of ChatGPT responses to information in standard patient counseling leaflets regarding common urogynecological procedures.

STUDY DESIGN

Seven urogynecologists compared the accuracy and completeness of ChatGPT responses to standard patient leaflets using 5-point Likert scales with a score of 3 being "equally accurate" and "equally complete," and a score of 5 being "much more accurate" and much more complete, respectively. This was repeated 3 months later to evaluate the consistency of ChatGPT. Additional analysis of the understandability and actionability was completed by 2 authors using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool. Analysis was primarily descriptive. First and second ChatGPT queries were compared with the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) accuracy was 3 (2-3) and completeness 3 (2-4) for the first ChatGPT query and 3 (3-3) and 4 (3-4), respectively, for the second query. Accuracy and completeness were significantly higher in the second query (P < 0.01). Understandability and actionability of ChatGPT responses were lower than the standard leaflets.

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT is similarly accurate and complete when compared with standard patient information leaflets for common urogynecological procedures. Large language models may be a helpful adjunct to direct patient-provider counseling. Further research to determine the efficacy and patient satisfaction of ChatGPT for patient counseling is needed.

摘要

重要性

大型语言模型是一种人工智能应用程序,能够理解和生成类似人类的文本和语言。ChatGPT 就是这样的一个模型。最近的进展增加了人们对大型语言模型在医学中的应用效用的兴趣。尿失禁咨询复杂且耗时。因此,我们评估了 ChatGPT 是否可以作为患者咨询的辅助工具。

目的

我们的主要目的是比较 ChatGPT 对常见尿失禁程序标准患者咨询传单中信息的准确性和完整性,与标准患者传单相比。

研究设计

7 名尿失禁专家使用 5 分李克特量表对 ChatGPT 的准确性和完整性进行了比较,评分 3 表示“准确性相当”和“完整性相当”,评分 5 表示“准确性更高”和“完整性更高”。3 个月后,重复了这一过程,以评估 ChatGPT 的一致性。两名作者使用患者教育材料评估工具完成了对可理解性和可操作性的额外分析。分析主要是描述性的。首先和第二个 ChatGPT 查询与 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行了比较。

结果

第一个 ChatGPT 查询的中位数(四分位距)准确性为 3(2-3),完整性为 3(2-4),第二个查询分别为 3(3-3)和 4(3-4)。第二次查询的准确性和完整性显著更高(P<0.01)。ChatGPT 响应的可理解性和可操作性低于标准传单。

结论

与常见尿失禁程序的标准患者信息传单相比,ChatGPT 的准确性和完整性相当。大型语言模型可能是直接医患咨询的有用辅助工具。需要进一步研究以确定 ChatGPT 对患者咨询的疗效和患者满意度。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of ChatGPT for Pelvic Floor Surgery Counseling.评估 ChatGPT 在盆底手术咨询中的应用。
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Mar 1;30(3):245-250. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001459.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Clinical Management of Wasp Stings Using Large Language Models: Cross-Sectional Evaluation Study.使用大语言模型对黄蜂蜇伤进行临床管理:横断面评估研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 4;27:e67489. doi: 10.2196/67489.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
7
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
8
Development and Validation of a Large Language Model-Powered Chatbot for Neurosurgery: Mixed Methods Study on Enhancing Perioperative Patient Education.用于神经外科手术的基于大语言模型的聊天机器人的开发与验证:关于加强围手术期患者教育的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 15;27:e74299. doi: 10.2196/74299.
9
ChatGPT-4o Compared With Human Researchers in Writing Plain-Language Summaries for Cochrane Reviews: A Blinded, Randomized Non-Inferiority Controlled Trial.ChatGPT-4o与人类研究人员在为Cochrane系统评价撰写通俗易懂的总结方面的比较:一项双盲、随机非劣效性对照试验。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Jul 28;3(4):e70037. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70037. eCollection 2025 Jul.
10
Enhancing the Readability of Online Patient Education Materials Using Large Language Models: Cross-Sectional Study.使用大语言模型提高在线患者教育材料的可读性:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 4;27:e69955. doi: 10.2196/69955.

引用本文的文献

1
Can ChatGPT Provide Patient-Friendly and Reliable Information on Cervical Cancer Screening? A Study of ChatGPT-Generated Information in Polish.ChatGPT能否提供有关宫颈癌筛查的患者友好且可靠的信息?一项关于波兰语的ChatGPT生成信息的研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jul 3;31:e947992. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947992.
2
Addressing Commonly Asked Questions in Urogynecology: Accuracy and Limitations of ChatGPT.解答泌尿妇科常见问题:ChatGPT的准确性与局限性
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06184-0.
3
The digital dialogue on premature ejaculation: evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence-driven responses.
早泄的数字对话:评估人工智能驱动回复的疗效
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Mar 20. doi: 10.1007/s11255-025-04461-x.
4
Artificial intelligence and patient education.人工智能与患者教育。
Curr Opin Urol. 2025 May 1;35(3):219-223. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001267. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
5
Large language models in patient education: a scoping review of applications in medicine.用于患者教育的大语言模型:医学应用的范围综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 29;11:1477898. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1477898. eCollection 2024.
6
Can CHATGPT provides reliable technical medical information about phimosis?ChatGPT能提供关于包茎的可靠医学技术信息吗?
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Sep-Oct;50(5):651-654. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9913.