Forchuk Callista A, Kocha Ilyana, Granek Joshua A, Dempster Kylie S, Younger William A, Gargala Dominic, Plouffe Rachel A, Bailey Suzanne, Guest Kim, Richardson J Don, Nazarov Anthony
MacDonald Franklin Operational Stress Injury Research Centre, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) - Toronto, Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mil Psychol. 2025;37(3):175-186. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2024.2324647. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
Effective mental health and stress resilience (MHSR) training is essential in military populations given their exposure to operational stressors. The scarcity of empirical evidence supporting the benefits of these programs emphasizes the need for research dedicated to program optimization. This paper aims to identify the relative importance of MHSR training attributes preferred by military members. Conjoint analysis (CA), an experimental method used to prioritize end-user preferences for product feature development, was conducted using an online survey with 567 Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) personnel. Participants made a series of choices between hypothetical MHSR training options that were systematically varied across seven training attributes. Each training attribute consisted of 3-4 variations in the nature of the attribute or its intensity. Participants also completed questions on health beliefs, mental health and previous MHSR training experiences, and demographics, to assess whether preferences varied by individual characteristics. CA demonstrated that instructor type, leadership buy-in, degree of skills practice, and content relevance/applicability were attributes of highest and relatively equal importance. This was followed by degree of accessible supplemental content. Lowest importance was placed on degree of behavioral nudging and demographic similarity between the trainee and trainer. Sociodemographic factors were not associated with MHSR training preferences. Programs that incorporate expert-led instruction, demonstrate leadership buy-in, embed practical applications within simulated stress environments, and provide a digitally-accessible platform to augment training may be well-received among military members. Understanding and accommodating personal preferences when designing MHSR training programs may increase relevance, foster acceptance and trust, and support sustained engagement.
鉴于军事人员面临作战压力源,有效的心理健康与压力恢复力(MHSR)训练至关重要。支持这些项目益处的实证证据匮乏,这凸显了致力于项目优化研究的必要性。本文旨在确定军事人员偏好的MHSR训练属性的相对重要性。联合分析(CA)是一种用于确定最终用户对产品功能开发偏好优先级的实验方法,通过对567名加拿大武装部队(CAF)人员进行在线调查来实施。参与者在一系列假设的MHSR训练选项之间做出选择,这些选项在七个训练属性上系统地变化。每个训练属性在属性性质或强度方面有3 - 4种变化。参与者还完成了关于健康信念、心理健康和以往MHSR训练经历以及人口统计学的问题,以评估偏好是否因个人特征而异。联合分析表明,教员类型、领导层支持、技能练习程度以及内容相关性/适用性是最重要且相对同等重要的属性。其次是可获取的补充内容程度。行为推动程度和学员与教员之间的人口统计学相似性的重要性最低。社会人口统计学因素与MHSR训练偏好无关。纳入专家指导教学、展示领导层支持、在模拟压力环境中嵌入实际应用并提供数字化可访问平台以增强训练的项目可能会受到军事人员的欢迎。在设计MHSR训练项目时理解并考虑个人偏好可能会提高相关性、促进接受和信任,并支持持续参与。