Calciolari Elena, Dourou Marina, Akcali Aliye, Donos Nikolaos
Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Institute of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Dental School, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Periodontol 2000. 2025 Feb;97(1):52-73. doi: 10.1111/prd.12550. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
Autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) applied alone or combined with other biomaterials are popular bioactive factors employed in regenerative medicine. The main biological rationale of using such products is to concentrate blood-derived growth factors and cells into the wound microenvironment to enhance the body's natural healing capacity. First-generation APC is represented by platelet-rich plasma (PRP). While different protocols have been documented for PRP preparation, they overall consist of two cycles of centrifugation and have important limitations related to the use of an anticoagulant first and an activator afterward, which may interfere with the natural healing process and the release of bioactive molecules. The second generation of platelet concentrates is represented by leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF). L-PRF protocols involve a single centrifugation cycle and do not require the use of anticoagulants and activators, which makes the preparation more straight forward, less expensive, and eliminates potential risks associated with the use of activators. However, since no anticoagulant is employed, blood undergoes rapid clotting within the blood collection tube; hence, a timely management of L-PRF is crucial. This review provides an overview on the most documented protocols for APC preparations and critically discusses the main differences between first- and second-generation APCs in terms of cell content, protein release, and the formation of a 3D fibrin network. It appears evident that the inconsistency in reporting protocol parameters by most studies has contributed to conflicting conclusions regarding the efficacy of different APC formulations and has significantly limited the ability to interpret the results of individual clinical studies. In the future, the use of a standardized classification system, together with a detailed reporting on APC protocol parameters is warranted to make study outcomes comparable. This will also allow to clarify important aspects on the mechanism of action of APCs (like the role of leukocytes and centrifugation parameters) and to optimize the use of APCs in regenerative medicine.
单独应用或与其他生物材料联合应用的自体血小板浓缩物(APC)是再生医学中常用的生物活性因子。使用此类产品的主要生物学原理是将血液来源的生长因子和细胞浓缩到伤口微环境中,以增强机体的自然愈合能力。第一代APC以富血小板血浆(PRP)为代表。虽然已有不同的PRP制备方案,但总体上都包括两个离心周期,并且存在重要局限性,即首先使用抗凝剂,随后使用激活剂,这可能会干扰自然愈合过程和生物活性分子的释放。第二代血小板浓缩物以富含白细胞和血小板的纤维蛋白(L-PRF)为代表。L-PRF制备方案涉及单个离心周期,不需要使用抗凝剂和激活剂,这使得制备过程更直接、成本更低,并消除了与使用激活剂相关的潜在风险。然而,由于未使用抗凝剂,血液在采血管内会迅速凝固;因此,对L-PRF进行及时处理至关重要。本综述概述了最有文献记载的APC制备方案,并批判性地讨论了第一代和第二代APC在细胞含量、蛋白质释放和三维纤维蛋白网络形成方面的主要差异。显然,大多数研究在报告方案参数方面的不一致导致了关于不同APC制剂疗效的相互矛盾的结论,并显著限制了对个体临床研究结果的解释能力。未来,使用标准化分类系统以及详细报告APC方案参数,对于使研究结果具有可比性是必要的。这也将有助于阐明APC作用机制的重要方面(如白细胞的作用和离心参数),并优化APC在再生医学中的应用。