Foster Tiarna, Eaton Melissa, Probst Yasmine
School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
J Eat Disord. 2024 Mar 15;12(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40337-023-00959-w.
To synthesise the evidence on the relationships between internalised weight bias (IWB) and biopsychosocial health outcomes in individuals ≤ 25 years.
A systematic review was conducted by searching five scientific databases up to May 2022 to retrieve studies that investigated associations between IWB and biopsychosocial outcomes. Articles with participants ≤ 25 years, at least one validated measure of IWB, one measure of a biopsychosocial outcome, and were observational were included. Excluded articles involved systematic literature reviews, case study reports, intervention studies, meta-analyses, grey literature, pilot, and feasibility studies. Quality assessment was carried out using the American Dietetic Association Quality Criteria Checklist. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO, ID number CRD42022323876.
Two hundred and sixty-six articles were identified. Nineteen were eligible for inclusion, (15 cross-sectional and 4 prospective). The Weight Bias Internalization Scale and the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire were the most used tools to assess IWB with large heterogeneity in tool types used to assess biopsychosocial measures. IWB had positive associations with psychopathology, eating disorder symptomology, higher BMI, being female, and experiences of weight stigma. It was negatively associated with quality of life, body image, physical activity, social ability, self-esteem, and socioeconomic status.
IWB associated with adverse biopsychosocial outcomes in children and youth populations. IWB may be more clinically relevant in assessing at-risk children and youth than physical weight due to its psychosocial aspects and ability to expand beyond the scope of BMI. Research would benefit from better assessment tools designed for children and youth that accurately measure IWB. Future research should focus on increased diversity and longitudinal study designs with children and youth-specific populations.
综合关于25岁及以下个体内化体重偏见(IWB)与生物心理社会健康结果之间关系的证据。
截至2022年5月,通过检索五个科学数据库进行系统综述,以检索调查IWB与生物心理社会结果之间关联的研究。纳入的文章要求参与者年龄≤25岁,至少有一项经过验证的IWB测量方法,一项生物心理社会结果测量方法,且为观察性研究。排除的文章包括系统文献综述、病例研究报告、干预研究、荟萃分析、灰色文献、试点研究和可行性研究。使用美国饮食协会质量标准清单进行质量评估。该方案已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42022323876。
共识别出266篇文章。19篇符合纳入标准(15篇横断面研究和4篇前瞻性研究)。体重偏见内化量表和体重自我污名问卷是评估IWB最常用的工具,用于评估生物心理社会指标的工具类型存在很大异质性。IWB与精神病理学、饮食失调症状、较高的体重指数、女性以及体重污名经历呈正相关。它与生活质量、身体形象、身体活动、社交能力、自尊和社会经济地位呈负相关。
IWB与儿童和青少年人群不良的生物心理社会结果相关。由于其社会心理方面以及超越体重指数范围的能力,IWB在评估高危儿童和青少年时可能比实际体重更具临床相关性。为儿童和青少年设计的能够准确测量IWB的更好评估工具将有助于研究。未来的研究应侧重于增加儿童和青少年特定人群的多样性和纵向研究设计。