• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《真实关系量表 - 客户版》8项版本的编制与验证

Development and validation of an 8-item version of the Real Relationship Inventory-Client form.

作者信息

Stefana Alberto, Fusar-Poli Paolo, Vieta Eduard, Gelso Charles J, Youngstrom Eric A

机构信息

Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.

OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Psychother Res. 2025 Mar;35(3):395-411. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2024.2320331. Epub 2024 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1080/10503307.2024.2320331
PMID:38497741
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a very brief version of the 24-item Real Relationship Inventory-Client (RRI-C) form.

METHOD

Two independent samples of individual psychotherapy patients (= 700, = 434) completed the RRI-C along with other measures. Psychometric scale shortening involved exploratory factor analysis, item response theory analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and multigroup CFA. Reliability and convergent and discriminant validity of the scale and subscales were also assessed.

RESULTS

The 8-item RRI-C (RRI-C-SF) preserves the two-factor structure: Genuineness (= 4, = .86) and Realism (= 4, = .87), which were correlated at = .74. CFA provided the following fit indices for the bifactor model: /= 2.16, CFI = .99, TLI = .96, RMSEA = .07, and SRMR = .03. Multigroup CFA showed that the RRI-C-SF was invariant across in-person and remote session formats. The RRI-C-SF demonstrated high reliability (= .91); high correlation with the full-length scale (= .96); and excellent convergent and discriminant validity with measures of other elements of the therapeutic relationship, personality characteristics, current mental health state, and demographic-clinical variables. Clinical change benchmarks were calculated to serve as valuable tools for both research and clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

The RRI-C-SF is a reliable measure that can be used for both research and clinical purposes. It enables a nuanced assessment of the genuineness and the realism dimensions of the real relationship.

摘要

目的

开发并验证24项《真实关系量表 - 来访者版》(RRI - C)的一个非常简短的版本。

方法

两个独立的个体心理治疗患者样本(n = 700,n = 434)完成了RRI - C以及其他测量。心理测量量表的缩短涉及探索性因素分析、项目反应理论分析、验证性因素分析(CFA)和多组CFA。还评估了量表及其子量表的信度、聚合效度和区分效度。

结果

8项RRI - C(RRI - C - SF)保留了双因素结构:真诚性(n = 4,α = 0.86)和现实性(n = 4,α = 0.87),二者的相关系数为r = 0.74。CFA为双因素模型提供了以下拟合指标:χ²/df = 2.16,CFI = 0.99,TLI = 0.96,RMSEA = 0.07,SRMR = 0.03。多组CFA表明,RRI - C - SF在面对面和远程治疗形式中具有不变性。RRI - C - SF表现出高信度(α = 0.91);与全长量表高度相关(r = 0.96);并且与治疗关系的其他要素、人格特征、当前心理健康状态以及人口统计学 - 临床变量的测量具有出色的聚合效度和区分效度。计算了临床变化基准,以作为研究和临床实践的有价值工具。

结论

RRI - C - SF是一种可靠的测量工具,可用于研究和临床目的。它能够对真实关系的真诚性和现实性维度进行细致入微的评估。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of an 8-item version of the Real Relationship Inventory-Client form.《真实关系量表 - 客户版》8项版本的编制与验证
Psychother Res. 2025 Mar;35(3):395-411. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2024.2320331. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
2
Evaluating the psychometric properties of the 24-item and 12-item real relationship inventory-client forms.评估24项和12项真实关系量表-客户版的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 3;20(3):e0311411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311411. eCollection 2025.
3
The real relationship inventory: development and psychometric investigation of the client form.真实关系量表:客户形式的发展和心理测量研究。
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2010 Dec;47(4):540-53. doi: 10.1037/a0022082.
4
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
The real relationship: the Portuguese version of the <em>Real Relationship Inventory-Client</em> form.真实关系:《真实关系量表-客户版》的葡萄牙语版本。
Res Psychother. 2023 Jul 5;26(2):678. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.678.
6
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
7
Evaluating psychometric properties of the Short Form Brief Pain Inventory Sinhala Version (SF BPI-Sin) among Sinhala speaking patients with cancer pain in Sri Lanka.评估短式简明疼痛量表僧伽罗语版(SF BPI-Sin)在斯里兰卡讲僧伽罗语的癌症疼痛患者中的心理计量特性。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Feb 23;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00538-1.
8
Psychometric properties of the Short-Form Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire among nursing students in China: A confirmatory factor analysis.中文版五因素正念量表在中国护生群体中的心理测量学特性:验证性因子分析。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jul;11(7):e2246. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2246.
9
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Gratitude at Work Scale in Employed Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.工作感恩量表中文版在在职护士中的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Res. 2024 Aug 1;32(4):e336. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000620.
10
Psychometric Evaluation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form in French Canadian Young Adults.法裔加拿大青年心理健康连续体简表的心理测量学评估
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;62(4):286-294. doi: 10.1177/0706743716675855. Epub 2016 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the psychometric properties of the 24-item and 12-item real relationship inventory-client forms.评估24项和12项真实关系量表-客户版的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 3;20(3):e0311411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311411. eCollection 2025.
2
Effectiveness of a Novel Web-Based Intervention to Enhance Therapeutic Relationships and Treatment Outcomes in Adult Individual Psychotherapy: Randomized Controlled Trial and Analysis of Predictors of Dropouts.新型基于网络的干预措施对增强成人个体心理治疗中治疗关系和治疗效果的有效性:随机对照试验和辍学预测因素分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Nov 27;11:e63234. doi: 10.2196/63234.
3
Patients' perspective on the therapeutic relationship and session quality: the central role of alliance.
患者对治疗关系和治疗环节质量的看法:联盟的核心作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;15:1367516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1367516. eCollection 2024.
4
Therapeutic relationship elements and therapy session outcomes: Protocol for a longitudinal study of the patient's perspective.治疗关系要素与治疗 session 结果:一项从患者角度进行纵向研究的方案
Open Res Eur. 2024 Jun 4;3:133. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.16466.2. eCollection 2023.
5
Assessing the patient's affective perception of their psychotherapist: validation of the .评估患者对其心理治疗师的情感认知:对……的验证
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 24;15:1346760. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1346760. eCollection 2024.
6
Enhancing Psychotherapy Outcomes by Encouraging Patients to Regularly Self-Monitor, Reflect on, and Share Their Affective Responses Toward Their Therapist: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.通过鼓励患者定期自我监测、反思并分享他们对治疗师的情感反应来提高心理治疗效果:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 8;13:e55369. doi: 10.2196/55369.