Suppr超能文献

作为失范的机构性自杀:在缺乏预防自杀的机构责任化背景下,通过涂尔干对自杀遗书的探索,死者为与工作相关的自杀发声。

Institutional suicide as anomie: decedents speak out for work-related suicides through a Durkheimian exploration of suicide notes in a context without institutional responsibilization for suicide prevention.

作者信息

Ozbilgin Mustafa F, Erbil Cihat, Demirbağ Orkun, Gündoğdu Nur, Şimşek Demirbağ Kübra

机构信息

Brunel Business School, Brunel University London, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Business Administration, Ankara Haci Bayram Veli University, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Front Sociol. 2024 Mar 4;9:1309119. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1309119. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Drawing on Durkheim's historical theorization of suicide, we extend his concept of anomic suicide, which is suicide due to a lack of social regulation, to introduce the concept of institutional suicide. We define institutional suicide as suicide due to the absence or decline of institutional policies, practices, and discourses for prevention. In this study, we explore the mechanisms for institutional suicides based on suicide notes Turkey, in a context without institutional responsibilization for prevention. Turkey provides a significant context for studying institutional suicides as policies, practices, and discourses for suicide prevention have been declining for some decades.

METHODS

Drawing on publically available suicide notes and narratives in Turkish media outlets, we analyze 17 suicide notes and responses from their institutions of work and friends, family, and colleagues.

FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION

We identify two mechanisms that lead to institutional suicides: (1) dehumanization due to lack of recognition and (2) misrecognition through a devaluation of potential. We extend the theory of anomie to institutional settings and offer social policy suggestions to improve institutional responses based on co-design based on suicide notes to prevent institutional suicides and call for institutional responsibilization for preventing work-related suicides.

摘要

引言

借鉴涂尔干关于自杀的历史理论,我们扩展了他的失范性自杀概念(即由于缺乏社会规范而导致的自杀),引入了制度性自杀的概念。我们将制度性自杀定义为由于预防方面的制度政策、实践和话语缺失或衰退而导致的自杀。在本研究中,我们基于土耳其的自杀遗书,在一个没有预防方面的制度责任的背景下,探讨制度性自杀的机制。土耳其为研究制度性自杀提供了一个重要背景,因为自杀预防的政策、实践和话语在过去几十年里一直在衰退。

方法

利用土耳其媒体公开的自杀遗书和叙述,我们分析了17份自杀遗书以及来自其工作机构、朋友、家人和同事的回应。

研究结果与讨论

我们确定了导致制度性自杀的两种机制:(1)因缺乏认可而导致的非人化,以及(2)通过对潜力的贬低而导致的误认。我们将失范理论扩展到制度环境中,并基于自杀遗书提出基于共同设计的社会政策建议,以改善制度反应,预防制度性自杀,并呼吁制度对预防与工作相关的自杀承担责任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/541b/10945024/f3d5294974cd/fsoc-09-1309119-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验