• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较可解释的极端梯度提升模型和人工神经网络模型预测重症急性胰腺炎。

Comparison of an interpretable extreme gradient boosting model and an artificial neural network model for prediction of severe acute pancreatitis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

Alpha Genomics Private Limited, Islamabad, Pakistan

出版信息

Pol Arch Intern Med. 2024 May 28;134(5). doi: 10.20452/pamw.16700. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

DOI:10.20452/pamw.16700
PMID:38501720
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Acute pancreatitis (AP) that progresses to persistent organ failure is referred to as severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). It is a condition associated with a relatively high mortality. A prediction model that would facilitate early recognition of patients at risk for SAP is crucial for improvement of patient prognosis.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and artificial neural network (ANN) models for predicting SAP.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 648 patients with AP were enrolled. XGBoost and ANN models were developed and validated in the training (519 patients) and test sets (129 patients). The accuracy and predictive performance of the XGBoost and ANN models were evaluated using both the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) and the area under the precision‑recall curves (AUC‑PRs).

RESULTS

A total of 15 variables were selected for model construction through a univariable analysis. The AUCs of the XGBoost and ANN models in 5‑fold cross‑validation of the training set were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.92), respectively, whereas the AUCs for the test set were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85-1) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96), respectively. The XGBoost model outperformed the ANN model in terms of both diagnostic accuracy and AUC‑PR. Individual predictions of the XGBoost model were explained using a local interpretable model‑agnostic explanation plot.

CONCLUSIONS

An interpretable XGBoost model showed better discriminatory efficiency for predicting SAP than the ANN model, and could be used in clinical practice to identify patients at risk for SAP.

摘要

简介

进展为持续性器官衰竭的胰腺炎(AP)被称为重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)。这种疾病的死亡率相对较高。开发一种有助于早期识别 SAP 风险患者的预测模型对于改善患者预后至关重要。

目的

本研究旨在评估极端梯度增强(XGBoost)和人工神经网络(ANN)模型预测 SAP 的准确性。

患者和方法

共纳入 648 例 AP 患者。在训练集(519 例患者)和测试集(129 例患者)中分别建立和验证了 XGBoost 和 ANN 模型。通过接受者操作特征曲线下面积(AUCs)和精度-召回曲线下面积(AUC-PRs)评估 XGBoost 和 ANN 模型的准确性和预测性能。

结果

通过单变量分析共选择了 15 个变量用于模型构建。训练集 5 折交叉验证中 XGBoost 和 ANN 模型的 AUC 分别为 0.92(95%可信区间,0.87-0.97)和 0.86(95%可信区间,0.78-0.92),而测试集的 AUC 分别为 0.93(95%可信区间,0.85-1)和 0.87(95%可信区间,0.79-0.96)。XGBoost 模型在诊断准确性和 AUC-PR 方面均优于 ANN 模型。XGBoost 模型的个体预测结果使用局部可解释模型无关解释图进行了解释。

结论

可解释的 XGBoost 模型在预测 SAP 方面的判别效率优于 ANN 模型,可用于临床实践中识别 SAP 风险患者。

相似文献

1
Comparison of an interpretable extreme gradient boosting model and an artificial neural network model for prediction of severe acute pancreatitis.比较可解释的极端梯度提升模型和人工神经网络模型预测重症急性胰腺炎。
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2024 May 28;134(5). doi: 10.20452/pamw.16700. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
2
[Application of machine learning model based on XGBoost algorithm in early prediction of patients with acute severe pancreatitis].基于XGBoost算法的机器学习模型在急性重症胰腺炎患者早期预测中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023 Apr;35(4):421-426. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20221019-00930.
3
Automated Machine Learning for the Early Prediction of the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis in Hospitals.医院中急性胰腺炎严重程度早期预测的自动化机器学习。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Jun 10;12:886935. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.886935. eCollection 2022.
4
Early prediction of severe acute pancreatitis using machine learning.利用机器学习对重症急性胰腺炎进行早期预测。
Pancreatology. 2022 Jan;22(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 16.
5
Artificial neural networks accurately predict intra-abdominal infection in moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis.人工神经网络能准确预测中重度和重度急性胰腺炎的腹腔内感染。
J Dig Dis. 2019 Sep;20(9):486-494. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12796. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
6
Usefulness of Random Forest Algorithm in Predicting Severe Acute Pancreatitis.随机森林算法在预测重症急性胰腺炎中的应用。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Jun 10;12:893294. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.893294. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparison of MPL-ANN and PLS-DA models for predicting the severity of patients with acute pancreatitis: An exploratory study.基于 MPL-ANN 和 PLS-DA 模型预测急性胰腺炎患者严重程度的比较:一项探索性研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;44:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.044. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
8
Severity stratification and prognostic prediction of patients with acute pancreatitis at early phase: A retrospective study.急性胰腺炎患者早期严重程度分层及预后预测:一项回顾性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(16):e15275. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015275.
9
Predicting fatal outcome in the early phase of severe acute pancreatitis by using novel prognostic models.使用新型预后模型预测重症急性胰腺炎早期的致命结局。
Pancreatology. 2003;3(4):309-15. doi: 10.1159/000071769.
10
Identification of severe acute pancreatitis using an artificial neural network.使用人工神经网络识别重症急性胰腺炎。
Surgery. 2007 Jan;141(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.022. Epub 2006 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective cohort study of infection and risk stratification using 6-year UBT data.利用6年尿素呼气试验(UBT)数据进行感染与风险分层的回顾性队列研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 26;13:1563841. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1563841. eCollection 2025.
2
AI and Machine Learning for Precision Medicine in Acute Pancreatitis: A Narrative Review.人工智能与机器学习在急性胰腺炎精准医疗中的应用:一项叙述性综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 29;61(4):629. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040629.