Aussems Karijn, Isarin Jet, Niemeijer Alistair, Dedding Christine
Academy, Royal Dutch Kentalis, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC (Location VUmc), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Educ Action Res. 2022 Oct 6;32(2):311-326. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2022.2130386. eCollection 2024.
Participatory Action Research (PAR) brings unique ethical challenges. Scholars have developed seven ethical principles to address these challenges. So far, little has been published on how these ethical principles (are put to) work in different fields. We used the principles to evaluate our collaboration with co-researchers with developmental language disorder (DLD). This article aims to explore how the principles helped to reflect on the ongoing research practice. First, we needed to simplify the language of the principles so that the co-researchers could understand how they relate to concrete practices. Second, the co-researchers needed to be reminded of specific events before they could relate the principles to their own experiences. Lastly, for an evaluation of (co-) researchers dealing with multiple roles, from friend to colleague and client, this theme has been specifically included to the principle of personal integrity, so that it cannot be overlooked. Looking through a care ethical lens, we suggest speaking of rather than (ethical) principles, as it more clearly communicates that these insights are based on learning by doing and are not fixed, but build on (good) practices, whilst still allowing enough room for adjustments to the particularities inherent to each research process.
参与式行动研究（PAR）带来了独特的伦理挑战。学者们已制定了七条伦理原则来应对这些挑战。到目前为止，关于这些伦理原则如何在不同领域发挥作用的相关著述甚少。我们运用这些原则来评估我们与患有发育性语言障碍（DLD）的共同研究者之间的合作。本文旨在探讨这些原则如何有助于反思正在进行的研究实践。首先，我们需要简化原则的表述，以便共同研究者能够理解它们与具体实践的关联。其次，需要提醒共同研究者特定的事件，然后他们才能将这些原则与自身经历联系起来。最后，为了评估（共同）研究者所扮演的多重角色，从朋友到同事再到客户，这一主题已被特别纳入个人诚信原则之中，使其不会被忽视。从关怀伦理的视角来看，我们建议提及“关怀伦理视角下的见解”而非（伦理）原则，因为这样能更清晰地传达出这些见解是基于实践中的学习，并非一成不变，而是建立在（良好）实践基础之上，同时仍为适应每个研究过程所固有的特殊性留出足够的调整空间。
