Department of Drug Safety Information, Korea Institute of Drug Safety and Risk Management, 14051, 6th FL, 30, Burim-ro 169beon-gil, Dongan-gu, Anyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
College of Pharmacy & Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, 08826, 1 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Drug Saf. 2024 Jul;47(7):673-686. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01418-4. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
Angiotensin receptor blockers are widely used antihypertensive drugs in South Korea. In 2021, the Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety acknowledged the need for national compensation for a drug-induced liver injury (DILI) after azilsartan use. However, little is known regarding the association between angiotensin receptor blockers and DILI.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study in incident users of angiotensin receptor blockers from a common data model database (1 January, 2017-31 December, 2021) to compare the risk of DILI among specific angiotensin receptor blockers against valsartan.
Patients were assigned to treatment groups at cohort entry based on prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers. Drug-induced liver injury was operationally defined using the International DILI Expert Working Group criteria. Cox regression analyses were conducted to derive hazard ratios and the inverse probability of treatment weighting method was applied. All analyses were performed using R.
In total, 229,881 angiotensin receptor blocker users from 20 university hospitals were included. Crude DILI incidence ranged from 15.6 to 82.8 per 1000 person-years in treatment groups, most were cholestatic and of mild severity. Overall, the risk of DILI was significantly lower in olmesartan users than in valsartan users (hazard ratio: 0.73 [95% confidence interval 0.55-0.96]). In monotherapy patients, the risk was significantly higher in azilsartan users than in valsartan users (hazard ratio: 6.55 [95% confidence interval 5.28-8.12]).
We found a significantly higher risk of suspected DILI in patients receiving azilsartan monotherapy compared with valsartan monotherapy. Our findings emphasize the utility of real-world evidence in advancing our understanding of adverse drug reactions in clinical practice.
血管紧张素受体阻滞剂在韩国被广泛用于治疗高血压。2021 年,韩国食品药品安全部承认,在使用阿齐沙坦后,需要对药物性肝损伤(DILI)进行国家赔偿。然而,对于血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与 DILI 之间的关系,知之甚少。
我们在一个共同数据模型数据库(2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日)的血管紧张素受体阻滞剂新使用者中进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以比较特定血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与缬沙坦相比发生 DILI 的风险。
根据处方血管紧张素受体阻滞剂,患者在队列入组时被分配到治疗组。使用国际 DILI 专家工作组标准对药物性肝损伤进行操作定义。采用 Cox 回归分析得出危险比,并应用逆概率治疗加权法。所有分析均使用 R 进行。
共纳入来自 20 所大学医院的 229881 名血管紧张素受体阻滞剂使用者。治疗组的 DILI 发生率为 15.6-82.8/1000 人年,大多数为胆汁淤积性,且严重程度较轻。总体而言,与缬沙坦使用者相比,奥美沙坦使用者的 DILI 风险显著降低(危险比:0.73[95%置信区间 0.55-0.96])。在单药治疗患者中,阿齐沙坦使用者的风险显著高于缬沙坦使用者(危险比:6.55[95%置信区间 5.28-8.12])。
我们发现,与缬沙坦单药治疗相比,阿齐沙坦单药治疗的患者发生疑似 DILI 的风险显著增加。我们的研究结果强调了真实世界证据在增进我们对临床实践中药物不良反应的理解方面的作用。