• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于案例推理和后悔理论的调水工程突发事件应急决策方法研究。

Study on the methodology of emergency decision-making for water transfer project contingencies: A case-based reasoning and regret theory approach.

机构信息

School of Water Conservancy, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, China.

College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0300272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300272. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0300272
PMID:38512978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10956882/
Abstract

To tackle the global water imbalance problem, a multitude of inter-basin water transfer projects have been built worldwide in recent decades. Nevertheless, given the complexity and safety challenges associated with project operation, effective emergency decision-making is crucial for addressing unforeseen incidents. Hence, this research has developed a two-stage emergency decision-making framework to tackle the uncertainty in the development trends of emergencies in inter-basin water transfer projects. (1) The first stage mainly utilizes case-based reasoning techniques to extract historical case information and disposal plans for inter-basin water transfer projects. Subsequently, a holistic similarity model is built by employing structural similarity and local attribute similarity algorithms to identify highly similar historical cases. (2) The second stage involves the optimization and adjustment of decision-making plans based on the dynamic evolution characteristics of emergencies. It utilizes the theory of decision-makers regret psychology and combines it with practical case studies to verify the scientific rationality of the method. This enables it to achieve effective multidimensional expression and rapid matching of scenarios, satisfying the decision-making requirements of "scenario response". Finally, this study compares the results obtained from this method with those computed using the traditional TOPSIS method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, further validating its feasibility and effectiveness. In practice, this method can provide effective support for decision-makers work.

摘要

为解决全球水资源失衡问题,近几十年来,全球范围内建设了许多跨流域调水工程。然而,鉴于项目运行所涉及的复杂性和安全挑战,有效的应急决策对于应对突发情况至关重要。因此,本研究提出了一种两阶段应急决策框架,以应对跨流域调水工程中突发事件发展趋势的不确定性。(1)第一阶段主要利用基于案例的推理技术提取跨流域调水工程的历史案例信息和处置方案。随后,通过结构相似性和局部属性相似性算法构建整体相似性模型,识别高度相似的历史案例。(2)第二阶段基于突发事件的动态演化特征,对决策方案进行优化和调整。它利用决策者后悔心理理论,并结合实际案例研究,验证了该方法的科学合理性。这使得它能够实现有效多维表达和快速场景匹配,满足“场景响应”的决策要求。最后,本研究将该方法的结果与传统 TOPSIS 方法和模糊综合评价方法的计算结果进行比较,进一步验证了其可行性和有效性。在实际应用中,该方法可为决策者提供有效支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/10956882/59cc2df16db5/pone.0300272.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/10956882/842a12db36db/pone.0300272.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/10956882/6b778e60ebb6/pone.0300272.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/10956882/bab69363da95/pone.0300272.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/10956882/59cc2df16db5/pone.0300272.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/10956882/842a12db36db/pone.0300272.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/10956882/6b778e60ebb6/pone.0300272.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/10956882/bab69363da95/pone.0300272.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95f5/10956882/59cc2df16db5/pone.0300272.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Study on the methodology of emergency decision-making for water transfer project contingencies: A case-based reasoning and regret theory approach.基于案例推理和后悔理论的调水工程突发事件应急决策方法研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 21;19(3):e0300272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300272. eCollection 2024.
2
Emergency decision-making model of environmental emergencies based on case-based reasoning method.基于案例推理方法的环境突发事件应急决策模型。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 15;262:110382. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110382. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
Multi-attribute decision-making method with triangular fuzzy numbers based on regret theory and the catastrophe progression method.基于后悔理论和突变级数法的三角模糊数多属性决策方法
Math Biosci Eng. 2022 Aug 18;19(12):12013-12030. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022559.
4
Contingency response decision of network public opinion emergencies based on intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and preference information of decision makers.基于直觉模糊熵和决策者偏好信息的网络舆情突发事件应急响应决策。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 28;12(1):3246. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07183-7.
5
A New Method to Assist Decision-Making of Water Environmental Emergency in Expressway Region.高速公路区域水环境应急决策的新方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 15;19(16):10043. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610043.
6
Public health emergency decision-making and management system sound research using rough set attribute reduction and blockchain.利用粗糙集属性约简和区块链构建健全的公共卫生应急决策与管理体系。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 4;12(1):3600. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07493-w.
7
Research on decision-making of emergency plan for waterlogging disaster in subway station project based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and TOPSIS.基于语言直觉模糊集和TOPSIS的地铁站项目内涝灾害应急预案决策研究
Math Biosci Eng. 2020 Jul 10;17(5):4825-4851. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020263.
8
Research on emergency management of urban waterlogging based on similarity fusion of multi-source heterogeneous data.基于多源异构数据相似融合的城市内涝应急管理研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 7;17(7):e0270925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270925. eCollection 2022.
9
Optimal Allocation of Water Resources and Eco-Compensation Mechanism Model Based on the Interval-Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Method for Tingjiang River.基于区间模糊两阶段随机规划方法的汀江流域水资源优化配置与生态补偿机制模型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010149.
10
Development of fuzzy multi-criteria approach to prioritize locations of treated wastewater use considering climate change scenarios.考虑气候变化情景,开发模糊多准则方法对经处理废水利用地点进行优先级排序。
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:505-516. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.013. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Interbasin water transfers in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大的跨流域调水。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 13;10(1):27. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-01935-4.
2
Sustainability of water transfer projects: A systematic review.调水工程的可持续性:系统评价。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 20;860:160500. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160500. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
3
Emergency decision-making model of environmental emergencies based on case-based reasoning method.基于案例推理方法的环境突发事件应急决策模型。
J Environ Manage. 2020 May 15;262:110382. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110382. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
4
Environmental incidents in China: Lessons from 2006 to 2015.中国环境事件:2006 年至 2015 年的教训。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Aug 15;633:1165-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.271. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
5
Effects of human management on black carbon sorption/desorption during a water transfer project: Recognizing impacts and identifying mitigation possibilities.人类管理对调水工程中黑碳吸/解吸的影响:认识影响并确定缓解可能性。
J Environ Manage. 2018 May 15;214:346-353. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.081. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
6
Sustainability of mega water diversion projects: Experience and lessons from China.大型调水工程的可持续性:来自中国的经验与教训。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Apr 1;619-620:721-731. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
7
Governance and management dynamics of landscape restoration at multiple scales: Learning from successful environmental managers in Sweden.多尺度景观恢复的治理与管理动态:借鉴瑞典成功的环境管理者经验
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jul 15;197:24-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
8
Industrial metal pollution in water and probabilistic assessment of human health risk.工业金属水污染及人体健康风险概率评估
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jan 1;185:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
9
Understanding influential factors on implementing green supply chain management practices: An interpretive structural modelling analysis.理解绿色供应链管理实践实施的影响因素:一项解释结构模型分析。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Mar 1;188:351-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.081. Epub 2016 Dec 19.