Jordan Jaime, Buckanavage Jack, Ilgen Jonathan, Gottlieb Michael, Hopson Laura R, Janicki Adam, Curato Mark, Chipman Anne K, Clarke Samuel O
Department of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Los Angeles California USA.
Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Mar 20;8(2):e10956. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10956. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Postresidency career choices are complex decisions that involve personal, professional, and financial preferences and may be influenced by training programs. It is unknown how residents navigate these decisions during emergency medicine (EM) residency. We explored EM residents' perspectives on career decision making and how residency programs can support career planning.
We conducted semistructured interviews at seven accredited EM residency programs from diverse locations and training formats. We used purposive sampling to reflect the diversity of trainees with regard to gender, level of training, and career plans. Two researchers independently coded the transcripts. We used a constructivist-interpretivist paradigm to guide our thematic analysis.
We interviewed 11 residents and identified major themes in three categories. Residents described being exposed to career options through formalized curricula such as required rotations, career fairs, and subspeciality tracks, highlighting the importance of access to faculty with diverse areas of clinical and academic expertise. Many noted that exposure was often self-driven. We identified three major themes regarding career decisions: instrumental factors, people involved, and processes of decision making. Instrumental factors included personal interests, goals, and values as well as practice characteristics, financial considerations, timing, and opportunity costs. Mentors and family were highly involved in resident career decisions. Residents often utilized reflection and conversations with mentors and peers in their decision-making process. Participants recommended that programs provide exposure to diverse career options early in training, protect time for career education, and ensure adequate mentorship and a supportive community. Participants suggested specific curricular content and strategies to support career decisions.
This study illuminates important factors involved in resident career decision making and how programs can support their trainees. Essential components include diverse experiences and building a reflective mentorship environment.
住院医师培训后的职业选择是复杂的决策,涉及个人、专业和财务偏好,可能会受到培训项目的影响。目前尚不清楚急诊医学(EM)住院医师在培训期间是如何做出这些决策的。我们探讨了急诊医学住院医师对职业决策的看法,以及住院医师培训项目如何支持职业规划。
我们在7个来自不同地点和培训形式的经认可的急诊医学住院医师培训项目中进行了半结构化访谈。我们采用目的抽样法,以反映受训者在性别、培训水平和职业规划方面的多样性。两名研究人员独立对访谈记录进行编码。我们使用建构主义-解释主义范式来指导我们的主题分析。
我们采访了11名住院医师,并确定了三大类主要主题。住院医师描述了通过正规课程,如必修轮转、职业招聘会和亚专业方向,接触到职业选择,强调了接触具有不同临床和学术专业领域的教员的重要性。许多人指出,接触往往是自我驱动的。我们确定了关于职业决策的三个主要主题:工具性因素、相关人员和决策过程。工具性因素包括个人兴趣、目标和价值观,以及实践特点、财务考虑、时机和机会成本。导师和家人高度参与住院医师的职业决策。住院医师在决策过程中经常利用反思以及与导师和同行的交流。参与者建议项目在培训早期提供接触多种职业选择的机会,为职业教育留出时间,并确保有足够的指导和支持性的社区。参与者提出了支持职业决策的具体课程内容和策略。
本研究阐明了住院医师职业决策中涉及的重要因素,以及项目如何支持其受训者。重要组成部分包括多样化的经历和建立一个反思性的指导环境。