Nichols Ryan, Charbonneau Mathieu, Chellappoo Azita, Davis Taylor, Haidle Miriam, Kimbrough Erik O, Moll Henrike, Moore Richard, Scott-Phillips Thom, Purzycki Benjamin Grant, Segovia-Martin Jose
Department of Philosophy, CSU Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, USA.
Center for the Study of Human Nature, CSU Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, USA.
Evol Hum Sci. 2024 Feb 13;6:e12. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.2. eCollection 2024.
The rapid growth of cultural evolutionary science, its expansion into numerous fields, its use of diverse methods, and several conceptual problems have outpaced corollary developments in theory and philosophy of science. This has led to concern, exemplified in results from a recent survey conducted with members of the Cultural Evolution Society, that the field lacks 'knowledge synthesis', is poorly supported by 'theory', has an ambiguous relation to biological evolution and uses key terms (e.g. 'culture', 'social learning', 'cumulative culture') in ways that hamper operationalization in models, experiments and field studies. Although numerous review papers in the field represent and categorize its empirical findings, the field's theoretical challenges receive less critical attention even though challenges of a theoretical or conceptual nature underlie most of the problems identified by Cultural Evolution Society members. Guided by the heterogeneous 'grand challenges' emergent in this survey, this paper restates those challenges and adopts an organizational style requisite to discussion of them. The paper's goal is to contribute to increasing conceptual clarity and theoretical discernment around the most pressing challenges facing the field of cultural evolutionary science. It will be of most interest to cultural evolutionary scientists, theoreticians, philosophers of science and interdisciplinary researchers.
文化进化科学的迅速发展,其向众多领域的拓展,其多样方法的运用以及若干概念问题,已超过了科学理论与哲学方面相应的发展。这引发了人们的担忧,如近期对文化进化协会成员进行的一项调查结果所示,该领域缺乏“知识整合”,理论支持不足,与生物进化的关系不明确,且在使用关键术语(如“文化”“社会学习”“累积文化”)时,其方式阻碍了在模型、实验和实地研究中的操作化。尽管该领域众多综述论文呈现并分类了其实证研究结果,但该领域的理论挑战却较少受到批判性关注,即便理论或概念性质的挑战是文化进化协会成员所指出的大多数问题的根源。受此次调查中出现的各种“重大挑战”的引导,本文重申这些挑战,并采用讨论这些挑战所需的组织形式。本文的目标是有助于提高围绕文化进化科学领域面临的最紧迫挑战的概念清晰度和理论辨别力。它将对文化进化科学家、理论家、科学哲学家和跨学科研究人员最具吸引力。