AHRC Centre for the Evolution of Cultural Diversity, Institute of Archaeology, University College London, 31-34 Gordon Square, London WC1H 0PY, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 12;365(1559):3781-5. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0202.
Evolutionary approaches to cultural change are increasingly influential, and many scientists believe that a 'grand synthesis' is now in sight. The papers in this Theme Issue, which derives from a symposium held by the AHRC Centre for the Evolution of Cultural Diversity (University College London) in December 2008, focus on how the phylogenetic tree-building and network-based techniques used to estimate descent relationships in biology can be adapted to reconstruct cultural histories, where some degree of inter-societal diffusion will almost inevitably be superimposed on any deeper signal of a historical branching process. The disciplines represented include the three most purely 'cultural' fields from the four-field model of anthropology (cultural anthropology, archaeology and linguistic anthropology). In this short introduction, some context is provided from the history of anthropology, and key issues raised by the papers are highlighted.
进化方法在文化变迁研究中的影响日益显著,许多科学家认为,现在即将出现一种“大综合”。本期特刊中的论文源自于 2008 年 12 月由人文研究理事会文化多样性进化研究中心(伦敦大学学院)主办的研讨会,主要关注如何调整系统发育树构建和基于网络的技术,以便在重建文化历史时估计血缘关系,因为在任何历史分支过程的深层信号上,几乎不可避免地都会叠加一定程度的社会间扩散。所涉及的学科包括从人类学的四大学科模式(文化人类学、考古学和语言人类学)中最纯粹的三个“文化”领域。在这篇简短的引言中,从人类学的历史背景提供了一些背景,并突出了论文中提出的关键问题。