• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前沿的正义:在医疗保健专业人员中培养对人工智能的有感问责制。

Justice at the Forefront: Cultivating felt accountability towards Artificial Intelligence among healthcare professionals.

机构信息

Research Center for Smarter Supply Chain, Business School, Soochow University, 50 Donghuan Road, Suzhou, 215006, China.

Sheffield University Management School, University of Sheffield, Conduit Rd, Sheffield, S10 1FL, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2024 Apr;347:116717. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116717. Epub 2024 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116717
PMID:38518481
Abstract

The advent of AI has ushered in a new era of patient care, but with it emerges a contentious debate surrounding accountability for algorithmic medical decisions. Within this discourse, a spectrum of views prevails, ranging from placing accountability on AI solution providers to laying it squarely on the shoulders of healthcare professionals. In response to this debate, this study, grounded in the mutualistic partner choice (MPC) model of the evolution of morality, seeks to establish a configurational framework for cultivating felt accountability towards AI among healthcare professionals. This framework underscores two pivotal conditions: AI ethics enactment and trusting belief in AI and considers the influence of organizational complexity in the implementation of this framework. Drawing on Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) of a sample of 401 healthcare professionals, this study reveals that a) focusing justice and autonomy in AI ethics enactment along with building trusting belief in AI reliability and functionality reinforces healthcare professionals' sense of felt accountability towards AI, b) fostering felt accountability towards AI necessitates ensuring the establishment of trust in its functionality for high complexity hospitals, and c) prioritizing justice in AI ethics enactment and trust in AI reliability is essential for low complexity hospitals.

摘要

人工智能的出现开创了患者护理的新时代,但随之而来的是围绕算法医疗决策的问责制的争议。在这场讨论中,存在着一系列观点,从将责任归咎于人工智能解决方案提供商到直接归咎于医疗保健专业人员。针对这一争论,本研究基于道德进化的互惠伴侣选择(MPC)模型,旨在为医疗保健专业人员培养对人工智能的责任感建立一个配置框架。该框架强调了两个关键条件:人工智能伦理执行和对人工智能的信任信念,并考虑了组织复杂性在该框架实施中的影响。本研究对 401 名医疗保健专业人员的样本进行了模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA),结果表明:a)在人工智能伦理执行中关注正义和自主性,同时建立对人工智能可靠性和功能性的信任,会增强医疗保健专业人员对人工智能的责任感;b)为高复杂性医院培养对人工智能的责任感需要确保对其功能性的信任;c)为低复杂性医院,在人工智能伦理执行中优先考虑正义和对人工智能可靠性的信任是至关重要的。

相似文献

1
Justice at the Forefront: Cultivating felt accountability towards Artificial Intelligence among healthcare professionals.前沿的正义:在医疗保健专业人员中培养对人工智能的有感问责制。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Apr;347:116717. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116717. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
2
Towards secure and trusted AI in healthcare: A systematic review of emerging innovations and ethical challenges.迈向医疗保健领域安全可信的人工智能:对新兴创新和伦理挑战的系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2025 Mar;195:105780. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105780. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
3
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.多利益相关方对人工智能在医疗保健中的应用的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
4
Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review.人工智能和机器人技术在医疗保健中的伦理问题:综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36671. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036671.
5
Artificial intelligence in medicine: Ethical, social and legal perspectives.人工智能在医学中的伦理、社会和法律视角。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2023 Dec 28;52(12):695-699. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2023272.
6
Large Language Models and User Trust: Consequence of Self-Referential Learning Loop and the Deskilling of Health Care Professionals.大语言模型与用户信任:自我参照学习循环的后果及医疗保健专业人员的技能退化
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 25;26:e56764. doi: 10.2196/56764.
7
Trustworthy and ethical AI-enabled cardiovascular care: a rapid review.可信且合乎道德的人工智能赋能心血管护理:快速综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 4;24(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02653-6.
8
Integrating Catholic Social Teaching with AI Ethics to Address Inequity in AI Healthcare.将天主教社会教义与 AI 伦理相结合,以解决 AI 医疗保健中的不平等问题。
J Relig Health. 2024 Dec;63(6):4323-4341. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02140-2. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
9
Twelve tips for addressing ethical concerns in the implementation of artificial intelligence in medical education.人工智能在医学教育中的应用中涉及伦理问题的 12 点建议
Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31;29(1):2330250. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2330250. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
10
Call for the responsible artificial intelligence in the healthcare.呼吁在医疗保健中使用负责任的人工智能。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Dec 21;30(1):e100920. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100920.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of Health Care Practitioners' Intention to Use AI-Enabled Clinical Decision Support Systems: Meta-Analysis Based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.预测医疗保健从业者使用人工智能临床决策支持系统的意图:基于统一技术接受和使用理论的元分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 5;26:e57224. doi: 10.2196/57224.