Department of Global Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China; Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing100871, China.
Department of Cardiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Sci Bull (Beijing). 2024 May 15;69(9):1302-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
Regional variations in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) management and outcomes have been an enormous public health issue. However, studies have yet to explore how to reduce the variations. The National Chest Pain Center Program (NCPCP) is the first nationwide, hospital-based, comprehensive, continuous quality improvement program for improving the quality of care in patients with ACS in China. We evaluated the association of NCPCP and regional variations in ACS healthcare using generalized linear mixed models and interaction analysis. Patients in the Western region had longer onset-to-first medical contact (FMC) time and time stay in non-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) hospitals, lower rates of PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, and higher rates of medication usage. Patients in Central regions had relatively lower in-hospital mortality and in-hospital heart failure rates. Differences in the door-to-balloon time (DtoB) and in-hospital mortality between Western and Eastern regions were less after accreditation (β = -8.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) -14.61 to -3.03; OR = 0.79, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.91). Similar results were found in differences in DtoB time, primary PCI rate for STEMI between Central and Eastern regions. The differences in PCI for higher-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients among different regions had been smaller. Additionally, the differences in medication use between Eastern and Western regions were higher after accreditation. Regional variations remained high in this large cohort of patients with ACS from hospitals participating in the NCPCP in China. More comprehensive interventions and hospital internal system optimizations are needed to further reduce regional variations in the management and outcomes of patients with ACS.
急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)管理和结局的区域性差异一直是一个巨大的公共卫生问题。然而,目前仍未有研究探索如何减少这些差异。国家胸痛中心项目(NCPCP)是中国首个全国范围的、以医院为基础的、全面的、持续质量改进计划,旨在提高 ACS 患者的护理质量。我们使用广义线性混合模型和交互分析评估了 NCPCP 与 ACS 医疗保健的区域性差异之间的关联。西部地区患者的首次医疗接触(FMC)到发病时间和非经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)医院停留时间较长,ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者接受 PCI 的比例较低,药物使用率较高。中部地区患者的住院死亡率和心力衰竭发生率相对较低。认证后,西部地区和东部地区的门球时间(DtoB)和住院死亡率差异较小(β=-8.82,95%置信区间(CI)-14.61 至-3.03;OR=0.79,95%CI 0.70 至 0.91)。在中部地区和东部地区之间,也发现了 DtoB 时间和 STEMI 患者的直接 PCI 率的差异较小。不同地区之间高危非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者接受 PCI 的差异也较小。此外,认证后,东部和西部地区之间的药物使用差异更大。在参加 NCPCP 的中国医院的大量 ACS 患者中,区域性差异仍然很高。需要更全面的干预措施和医院内部系统优化,以进一步减少 ACS 患者管理和结局的区域性差异。