• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理和结局的性别差异。

Sex Disparities in Management and Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

机构信息

Department of Global Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China.

Institute for Global Health and Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2338707. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.38707.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.38707
PMID:37862014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10589815/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Sex disparities in the management and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have received increasing attention.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of a quality improvement program with sex disparities among patients with ACS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The National Chest Pain Centers Program (NCPCP) is an ongoing nationwide program for the improvement of quality of care in patients with ACS in China, with CPC accreditation as a core intervention. In this longitudinal analysis of annual (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020) cross-sectional data of 1 095 899 patients with ACS, the association of the NCPCP with sex-related disparities in the care of these patients was evaluated using generalized linear mixed models and interaction analysis. The robustness of the results was assessed by sensitivity analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022.

EXPOSURE

Hospital participation in the NCPCP.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Differences in treatment and outcomes between men and women with ACS. Prehospital indicators included time from onset to first medical contact (onset-FMC), time from onset to calling an emergency medical service (onset-EMS), and length of hospital stay without receiving a percutaneous coronary intervention (non-PCI). In-hospital quality indicators included non-PCI, use of statin at arrival, discharge with statin, discharge with dual antiplatelet therapy, direct PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), PCI for higher-risk non-ST-segment elevation ACS, time from door to catheterization activation, and time from door to balloon. Patient outcome indicators included in-hospital mortality and in-hospital new-onset heart failure.

RESULTS

Data for 1 095 899 patients with ACS (346 638 women [31.6%] and 749 261 men [68.4%]; mean [SD] age, 63.9 [12.4] years) from 989 hospitals were collected. Women had longer times for onset-FMC and onset-EMS; lower rates of PCI, statin use at arrival, and discharge with medication; longer in-hospital delays; and higher rates of in-hospital heart failure and mortality. The NCPCP was associated with less onset-FMC time, more direct PCI rate for STEMI, lower rate of in-hospital heart failure, more drug use, and fewer in-hospital delays for both men and women with ACS. Sex-related differences in the onset-FMC time (β = -0.03 [95% CI, -0.04 to -0.01), rate of direct PCI for STEMI (odds ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.06-1.17]), time from hospital door to balloon (β = -1.38 [95% CI, -2.74 to -0.001]), and rate of in-hospital heart failure (odds ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.86-0.94]) were significantly less after accreditation.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this longitudinal cross-sectional study of patients with ACS from hospitals participating in the NCPCP in China, sex-related disparities in management and outcomes were smaller in some aspects by regionalization between prehospital emergency and in-hospital treatment systems and standardized treatment procedures. The NCPCP should emphasize sex disparities to cardiologists; highlight compliance with clinical guidelines, particularly for female patients; and include the reduction of sex disparities as a performance appraisal indicator.

摘要

重要性

急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)管理和结局方面的性别差异越来越受到关注。

目的

评估一项质量改进计划与 ACS 患者中性别差异的相关性。

设计、地点和参与者:全国胸痛中心项目(NCPCP)是中国一项正在进行的全国性计划,旨在改善 ACS 患者的护理质量,CPC 认证是其核心干预措施。在对 1095899 例 ACS 患者的年度(2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日)横断面数据的纵向分析中,使用广义线性混合模型和交互分析评估了 NCPCP 与这些患者护理方面的性别相关差异之间的关联。通过反概率治疗加权的敏感性分析评估了结果的稳健性。数据于 2021 年 9 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日进行分析。

暴露因素

医院参与 NCPCP。

主要结局和测量指标

ACS 患者治疗和结局的性别差异。院前指标包括从发病到首次医疗接触(发病-FMC)的时间、从发病到呼叫急救服务(发病-EMS)的时间以及未接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(非 PCI)的住院时间。院内质量指标包括非 PCI、到达时使用他汀类药物、出院时使用他汀类药物、出院时使用双联抗血小板治疗、ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的直接 PCI、高危非 ST 段抬高型 ACS 的 PCI、门到导管激活时间和门到球囊时间。患者结局指标包括住院死亡率和住院新发心力衰竭。

结果

从 989 家医院收集了 1095899 例 ACS 患者(346638 例女性[31.6%]和 749261 例男性[68.4%];平均[SD]年龄,63.9[12.4]岁)的数据。女性发病-FMC 和发病-EMS 时间较长;PCI、到达时使用他汀类药物和出院时用药的比例较低;院内延迟时间较长;心力衰竭和死亡率较高。NCPCP 与 ACS 男性和女性的发病-FMC 时间(β=-0.03[95%CI,-0.04 至-0.01])、STEMI 的直接 PCI 率(比值比,1.11[95%CI,1.06-1.17])、医院门到球囊时间(β=-1.38[95%CI,-2.74 至-0.001])和心力衰竭住院率(比值比,0.90[95%CI,0.86-0.94])显著降低有关。

结论和相关性

在这项对参与中国 NCPCP 的医院 ACS 患者进行的纵向横断面研究中,通过院前急救和院内治疗系统之间的区域化以及标准化治疗程序,在某些方面管理和结局方面的性别差异有所缩小。NCPCP 应向心脏病专家强调性别差异;强调遵守临床指南,特别是针对女性患者;并将减少性别差异作为绩效评估指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed8/10589815/25c9296c21cc/jamanetwopen-e2338707-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed8/10589815/b088b59de359/jamanetwopen-e2338707-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed8/10589815/6d5e1b8b65b4/jamanetwopen-e2338707-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed8/10589815/25c9296c21cc/jamanetwopen-e2338707-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed8/10589815/b088b59de359/jamanetwopen-e2338707-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed8/10589815/6d5e1b8b65b4/jamanetwopen-e2338707-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ed8/10589815/25c9296c21cc/jamanetwopen-e2338707-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex Disparities in Management and Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理和结局的性别差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2338707. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.38707.
2
Regional variations in management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome in China: Evidence from the National Chest Pain Center Program.中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理和结局的地域差异:来自国家胸痛中心项目的证据。
Sci Bull (Beijing). 2024 May 15;69(9):1302-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2024.03.010. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
3
Survival benefit from recent changes in management of men and women with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高心肌梗死患者管理的近期变化带来的生存获益。
Cardiol J. 2019;26(5):459-468. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0057. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
4
Sex and gender differences in presentation, treatment and outcomes in acute coronary syndrome, a 10 year study from a multi-ethnic Asian population: The Malaysian National Cardiovascular Disease Database-Acute Coronary Syndrome (NCVD-ACS) registry.急性冠状动脉综合征中表现、治疗和结局的性别差异:一项来自多民族亚洲人群的 10 年研究:马来西亚国家心血管疾病数据库-急性冠状动脉综合征(NCVD-ACS)注册研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0246474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246474. eCollection 2021.
5
[Evidence-based management of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Latest guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2010].[ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的循证管理。欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)2010年最新指南]
Herz. 2010 Dec;35(8):558-64. doi: 10.1007/s00059-010-3401-8.
6
Sex Differences in In-Hospital Management and Outcomes of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院期间管理和结局的性别差异。
Circulation. 2019 Apr 9;139(15):1776-1785. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.037655.
7
Factors associated with door-in to door-out delays among ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada.转至初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者门到门延迟的相关因素:加拿大安大略省一项基于人群的队列研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Oct 29;18(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0940-z.
8
Frequency of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment myocardial infarction, and unstable angina: results from a Southwest Chinese Registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死、非ST段抬高型心肌梗死及不稳定型心绞痛的发病率:一项中国西南地区注册研究的结果
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 30;22(1):239-245. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2021.01.103.
9
[Age-related differences in the management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome under the chest pain center model: a multicenter retrospective study].胸痛中心模式下急性冠状动脉综合征管理与结局的年龄相关差异:一项多中心回顾性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):318-323. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200806-00565.
10
Analysis of situation of acute coronary syndrome based on the date of the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome (CCC-ACS) project: single-centre observational study.基于改善中国心血管疾病治疗-急性冠脉综合征(CCC-ACS)项目日期的急性冠脉综合征情况分析:单中心观察性研究。
Postgrad Med J. 2020 Dec;96(1142):742-746. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137008. Epub 2020 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring sex differences in mortality among acute myocardial infarction.探索急性心肌梗死患者死亡率的性别差异。
Open Heart. 2025 Aug 18;12(2):e003517. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003517.
2
Sex-related differences in acute coronary syndrome: insights from an observational study in a Yemeni cohort.急性冠状动脉综合征中的性别差异:来自也门队列观察性研究的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 3;12:1481917. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1481917. eCollection 2025.
3
Direct economic burden of acute coronary syndromes in the Portuguese National Health Service-facts and trends between 2002 and 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the effect of quality improvement initiatives on decreasing racial disparities in maternal morbidity.考察质量改进措施对降低产妇发病率中的种族差异的影响。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Sep;31(9):670-678. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014225. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
2
Gender differences in use of invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for acute ischaemic heart disease in Chinese adults.中国成年人急性缺血性心脏病诊断和治疗方法的性别差异。
Heart. 2022 Feb;108(4):292-299. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-318988. Epub 2021 May 27.
3
Sex disparities in the presentation, management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the ACS QUIK trial.
葡萄牙国家医疗服务体系中急性冠脉综合征的直接经济负担——2002年至2022年的事实与趋势
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1433307. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1433307. eCollection 2025.
4
Sex Differences in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Scoping Review Across the Care Continuum.急性冠状动脉综合征中的性别差异:全病程范围综述
Glob Heart. 2025 Mar 11;20(1):26. doi: 10.5334/gh.1410. eCollection 2025.
5
Prolonged pain-to-balloon time still impairs midterm left ventricular function following STEMI.在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)后,较长的疼痛至球囊扩张时间仍会损害中期左心室功能。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04484-3.
6
Sex differences in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients treated by primary percutaneous intervention.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的性别差异。
Open Heart. 2025 Jan 4;12(1):e002831. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002831.
7
Lipoprotein Metabolism, Dyslipidemia, and Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Women: A Comprehensive Review.女性脂蛋白代谢、血脂异常及降脂治疗:综述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;17(7):913. doi: 10.3390/ph17070913.
8
Impact of Sex in the Incidence of Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome.性别对慢性冠状动脉综合征患者心力衰竭发生率的影响。
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2024 Aug;21(4):354-366. doi: 10.1007/s11897-024-00663-z. Epub 2024 May 4.
急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床表现、治疗管理和结局的性别差异:来自 ACS QUIK 试验的观察。
Open Heart. 2021 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001470.
4
Effectiveness of chest pain centre accreditation on the management of acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective study using a national database.胸痛中心认证对急性冠状动脉综合征管理的效果:使用国家数据库的回顾性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Nov;30(11):867-875. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011491. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
5
Geographic Variation in Process and Outcomes of Care for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in China From 2001 to 2015.中国 2001 年至 2015 年急性心肌梗死患者的治疗过程和结局的地域差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2021182. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21182.
6
Association of Sensory Impairments With Cognitive Decline and Depression Among Older Adults in China.中国老年人感官障碍与认知能力下降和抑郁的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2014186. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14186.
7
Gender disparities in clinical practice: are there any solutions? Scoping review of interventions to overcome or reduce gender bias in clinical practice.临床实践中的性别差异:有解决方案吗?对克服或减少临床实践中性别偏见的干预措施的范围审查。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 22;19(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01283-4.
8
Gender Difference in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Outcomes Following the Survival of Acute Coronary Syndrome.性别差异与急性冠状动脉综合征存活后的心血管疾病二级预防及结局
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Jan;30(1):121-127. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.06.026. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
9
Sex Disparities in Myocardial Infarction: Biology or Bias?心肌梗死中的性别差异:生物学因素还是偏见?
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Jan;30(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
10
Sex-Specific Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的性别特异性结局
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 6;9(7):2124. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072124.