Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, China.
Department of Radiology, Yancheng Tinghu District People's Hospital, Yancheng, China.
Radiol Med. 2024 May;129(5):702-711. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01810-1. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
We to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI radiomics in detecting extracapsular extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (PCa).
A literature search of online databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar online scientific publication databases was performed to identify studies published up to July 2023. The summary estimates were pooled with the hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic (HSROC) model. This study was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement, the quality of included studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool (QUADAS-2) and the radiomics quality score (RQS). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the impact of varying clinical settings.
A total of ten studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.84, I = 83.5%) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.82, I = 83.5%), respectively, with an area under the HSROC curve of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91). Study quality was not high while assessing with the RQS. Substantial heterogeneity was observed between studies; however, meta-regression analysis did not reveal any significant contributing factors.
MRI radiomics demonstrated moderate sensitivity and specificity, offering similar diagnostic performance with previous risk stratifications and models that primarily based on radiologists' subjective experience. However, all studies included were retrospective, thus the performance of radiomics needs to validate in prospective, multicenter studies.
系统评价 MRI 放射组学检测前列腺癌(PCa)囊外扩展(EPE)的诊断性能。
检索 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 在线科学出版物数据库,检索截至 2023 年 7 月发表的研究。使用层次汇总受试者工作特征(HSROC)模型汇总汇总估计值。本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行报告,使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具-2(QUADAS-2)和放射组学质量评分(RQS)评估纳入研究的质量。进行了元回归和亚组分析,以探讨不同临床环境的影响。
共有 10 项研究符合纳入标准。汇总的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.77(95%CI 0.68-0.84,I=83.5%)和 0.75(95%CI 0.67-0.82,I=83.5%),HSROC 曲线下面积为 0.88(95%CI 0.85-0.91)。使用 RQS 评估时,研究质量不高。研究之间存在很大的异质性;然而,元回归分析没有发现任何显著的影响因素。
MRI 放射组学显示出中等的敏感性和特异性,与主要基于放射科医生主观经验的先前风险分层和模型具有相似的诊断性能。然而,所有纳入的研究都是回顾性的,因此放射组学的性能需要在前瞻性、多中心研究中进行验证。