• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内科诊断错误风险的非典型表现的定义与测量:一项范围综述方案

Definitions and Measurements for Atypical Presentations at Risk for Diagnostic Errors in Internal Medicine: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

作者信息

Harada Yukinori, Kawamura Ren, Yokose Masashi, Shimizu Taro, Singh Hardeep

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Generalist Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Japan.

Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 25;13:e56933. doi: 10.2196/56933.

DOI:10.2196/56933
PMID:38526541
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11002735/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atypical presentations have been increasingly recognized as a significant contributing factor to diagnostic errors in internal medicine. However, research to address associations between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors has not been evaluated due to the lack of widely applicable definitions and criteria for what is considered an atypical presentation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to describe how atypical presentations are defined and measured in studies of diagnostic errors in internal medicine and use this new information to develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations at high risk for diagnostic errors.

METHODS

This study will follow an established framework for conducting scoping reviews. Inclusion criteria are developed according to the participants, concept, and context framework. This review will consider studies that fulfill all of the following criteria: include adult patients (participants); explore the association between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors using any definition, criteria, or measurement to identify atypical presentations and diagnostic errors (concept); and focus on internal medicine (context). Regarding the type of sources, this scoping review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods study designs; systematic reviews; and opinion papers for inclusion. Case reports, case series, and conference abstracts will be excluded. The data will be extracted through MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar searches. No limits will be applied to language, and papers indexed from database inception to December 31, 2023, will be included. Two independent reviewers (YH and RK) will conduct study selection and data extraction. The data extracted will include specific details about the patient characteristics (eg, age, sex, and disease), the definitions and measuring methods for atypical presentations and diagnostic errors, clinical settings (eg, department and outpatient or inpatient), type of evidence source, and the association between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors relevant to the review question. The extracted data will be presented in tabular format with descriptive statistics, allowing us to identify the key components or types of atypical presentations and develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations for future studies of diagnostic errors. Developing the new criteria will follow guidance for a basic qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach.

RESULTS

As of January 2024, a literature search through multiple databases is ongoing. We will complete this study by December 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review aims to provide rigorous evidence to develop new criteria to identify atypical presentations at high risk for diagnostic errors in internal medicine. Such criteria could facilitate the development of a comprehensive conceptual model to understand the associations between atypical presentations and diagnostic errors in internal medicine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework; www.osf.io/27d5m.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/56933.

摘要

背景

非典型表现日益被认为是内科诊断错误的一个重要促成因素。然而,由于缺乏关于什么是非典型表现的广泛适用的定义和标准,针对非典型表现与诊断错误之间关联的研究尚未得到评估。

目的

本研究的目的是描述在内科诊断错误研究中如何定义和衡量非典型表现,并利用这些新信息制定新的标准,以识别具有诊断错误高风险的非典型表现。

方法

本研究将遵循进行范围综述的既定框架。纳入标准根据参与者、概念和背景框架制定。本综述将考虑符合以下所有标准的研究:纳入成年患者(参与者);使用任何定义、标准或测量方法来识别非典型表现和诊断错误,探讨非典型表现与诊断错误之间的关联(概念);并聚焦于内科(背景)。关于资料来源类型,本范围综述将考虑定量、定性和混合方法研究设计;系统综述;以及纳入的观点论文。病例报告、病例系列和会议摘要将被排除。数据将通过检索MEDLINE、科学网、护理学与健康领域数据库、Embase、考克兰图书馆和谷歌学术获取。不设语言限制,将纳入从数据库建立至2023年12月31日索引的论文。两名独立评审员(YH和RK)将进行研究选择和数据提取。提取的数据将包括有关患者特征(如年龄、性别和疾病)的具体细节、非典型表现和诊断错误的定义及测量方法、临床环境(如科室和门诊或住院)、证据来源类型,以及与综述问题相关的非典型表现和诊断错误之间的关联。提取的数据将以表格形式呈现并带有描述性统计,使我们能够识别非典型表现的关键组成部分或类型,并制定新的标准以识别非典型表现,供未来诊断错误研究使用。制定新的标准将遵循基本定性内容分析的指导并采用归纳法。

结果

截至2024年1月,正在通过多个数据库进行文献检索。我们将在2024年12月前完成本研究。

结论

本范围综述旨在提供严谨的证据,以制定新的标准来识别内科中具有诊断错误高风险的非典型表现。这样的标准有助于建立一个全面的概念模型,以理解内科中非典型表现与诊断错误之间的关联。

试验注册

开放科学框架;www.osf.io/27d5m。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/56933。

相似文献

1
Definitions and Measurements for Atypical Presentations at Risk for Diagnostic Errors in Internal Medicine: Protocol for a Scoping Review.内科诊断错误风险的非典型表现的定义与测量:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 25;13:e56933. doi: 10.2196/56933.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Sustainability of Interprofessional Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.跨专业教育的可持续性:一项范围审查方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 9;13:e60763. doi: 10.2196/60763.
6
eHealth Tools Supporting Early Childhood Education and Care Centers to Assess and Enhance Nutrition and Physical Activity Environments: Protocol for a Scoping Review.支持幼儿教育与照料中心评估和改善营养与身体活动环境的电子健康工具:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 24;12:e52252. doi: 10.2196/52252.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Harm reduction for perinatal cannabis use: protocol for a scoping review of clinical practices.围产期大麻使用的危害减少:临床实践范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 10;14(12):e090453. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090453.
9
Characteristics of Occupational Therapy Interventions to Promote Healthy Aging: Protocol for a Scoping Review.促进健康老龄化的职业治疗干预措施的特点:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 18;13:e55198. doi: 10.2196/55198.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of atypical presentations among outpatients and associations with diagnostic error.门诊患者中不典型表现的患病率及其与诊断错误的关系。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Dec 8;11(1):40-48. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0060. eCollection 2024 Feb 1.
2
Diagnostic errors in uncommon conditions: a systematic review of case reports of diagnostic errors.罕见病诊断失误:病例报告中诊断失误的系统综述。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Aug 10;10(4):329-336. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0030. eCollection 2023 Nov 1.
3
Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA.美国诊断错误导致的严重危害负担。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Jan 19;33(2):109-120. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014130.
4
A clinically-guided unsupervised clustering approach to recommend symptoms of disease associated with diagnostic opportunities.一种基于临床指导的无监督聚类方法,用于推荐与诊断机会相关的疾病症状。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2022 Sep 21;10(1):43-53. doi: 10.1515/dx-2022-0044. eCollection 2023 Feb 1.
5
Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews.综述的提取、分析和结果呈现建议。
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Mar 1;21(3):520-532. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00123.
6
Characteristics of Disease-Specific and Generic Diagnostic Pitfalls: A Qualitative Study.疾病特异性和通用诊断陷阱特征:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2144531. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44531.
7
Stroke hospitalization after misdiagnosis of "benign dizziness" is lower in specialty care than general practice: a population-based cohort analysis of missed stroke using SPADE methods.基于人群的队列分析,采用SPADE方法研究误诊为“良性头晕”后在专科护理中发生卒中住院的情况低于全科医疗:漏诊卒中的研究
Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 Jun 21;9(1):96-106. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0124.
8
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
9
Malpractice Claims of Internal Medicine Involving Diagnostic and System Errors in Japan.日本内科涉及诊断和系统错误的医疗事故索赔。
Intern Med. 2021 Sep 15;60(18):2919-2925. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.6652-20. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
10
Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.范围综述实施的更新方法学指南。
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Oct;18(10):2119-2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.