• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的卫生机构层级管理评估量表:在加纳、乌干达和马拉维开发和验证机构管理量表。

A new scale to assess health-facility level management: the development and validation of the facility management scale in Ghana, Uganda, and Malawi.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Trinity Centre for Global Health, Trinity College Dublin, 7-9 Leinster Street South, Dublin 2, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 25;24(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10781-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-10781-y
PMID:38528595
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10964570/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increased recognition of governance, leadership, and management as determinants of health system performance has prompted calls for research focusing on the nature, quality, and measurement of this key health system building block. In low- or middle-income contexts (LMIC), where facility-level management and performance remain a challenge, valid tools to measure management have the potential to boost performance and accelerate improvements. We, therefore, sought to develop a Facility-level Management Scale (FMS) and test its reliability in the psychometric properties in three African contexts.

METHODS

The FMS was administered to 881 health workers in; Ghana (n = 287; 32.6%), Malawi (n = 66; 7.5%) and Uganda (n = 528; 59.9%). Half of the sample data was randomly subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Monte Carlo Parallel Component Analysis to explore the FMS' latent structure. The construct validity of this structure was then tested on the remaining half of the sample using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The FMS' convergent and divergent validity, as well as internal consistency, were also tested.

RESULTS

Findings from the EFA and Monte Carlo PCA suggested the retention of three factors (labelled 'Supportive Management', 'Resource Management' and 'Time management'). The 3-factor solution explained 51% of the variance in perceived facility management. These results were supported by the results of the CFA (N = 381; χ2 = 256.8, df = 61, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.94; TLI = 0.92; RMSEA [95% CI] = 0.065 [0.057-0.074]; SRMR = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

The FMS is an open-access, short, easy-to-administer scale that can be used to assess how health workers perceive facility-level management in LMICs. When used as a regular monitoring tool, the FMS can identify key strengths or challenges pertaining to time, resources, and supportive management functions at the health facility level.

摘要

背景

人们越来越认识到治理、领导和管理是影响卫生系统绩效的决定因素,因此呼吁开展研究,重点关注这一关键卫生系统组成部分的性质、质量和衡量标准。在设施层面的管理和绩效仍然是一个挑战的中低收入国家(LMIC),有效的管理工具有可能提高绩效并加速改善。因此,我们试图开发一种设施层面管理量表(FMS),并在三个非洲国家的背景下测试其在心理测量特性中的可靠性。

方法

在加纳(n=287;32.6%)、马拉维(n=66;7.5%)和乌干达(n=528;59.9%),881 名卫生工作者接受了 FMS 的测试。半样本数据被随机进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和蒙特卡罗并行成分分析,以探索 FMS 的潜在结构。然后,使用验证性因素分析(CFA)对半样本数据的结构进行了构建效度测试。还测试了 FMS 的收敛和发散效度以及内部一致性。

结果

EFA 和蒙特卡罗 PCA 的结果表明保留了三个因素(分别标记为“支持性管理”、“资源管理”和“时间管理”)。3 因素解决方案解释了感知设施管理中 51%的方差。这些结果得到了 CFA 的支持(n=381;χ2=256.8,df=61,p<0.001;CFI=0.94;TLI=0.92;RMSEA[95%CI]=0.065[0.057-0.074];SRMR=0.047)。

结论

FMS 是一种开放获取的、简短的、易于管理的量表,可用于评估卫生工作者如何在中低收入国家感知设施层面的管理。作为一种常规监测工具,FMS 可以识别与时间、资源和支持性管理功能相关的关键优势或挑战。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2b/10964570/b7f0e10d3ae9/12913_2024_10781_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2b/10964570/b7f0e10d3ae9/12913_2024_10781_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a2b/10964570/b7f0e10d3ae9/12913_2024_10781_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A new scale to assess health-facility level management: the development and validation of the facility management scale in Ghana, Uganda, and Malawi.一种新的卫生机构层级管理评估量表:在加纳、乌干达和马拉维开发和验证机构管理量表。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 25;24(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10781-y.
2
Preliminary validation of the PRImary care facility Management Evaluation tool (PRIME-Tool), a national facility management survey implemented in Ghana.初步验证初级保健机构管理评估工具(PRIME-Tool),这是在加纳实施的一项全国性设施管理调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 5;19(1):937. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4768-8.
3
Validity of the Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale (PIES) in patients with epilepsy in Uganda.乌干达癫痫患者个人影响量表(PIES)的有效性。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jan;114(Pt B):107303. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107303. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
4
Determinants of safety climate at primary care level in Ghana, Malawi and Uganda: a cross-sectional study across 138 selected primary healthcare facilities.加纳、马拉维和乌干达基层医疗保健安全氛围的决定因素:在 138 个选定的基层医疗保健设施进行的横断面研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Jun 7;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00617-9.
5
Translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Ghanaian language (Akan; Asante Twi) version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire.《健康素养问卷》加纳语(阿坎语;阿散蒂特维语)版本的翻译、文化调适及心理测量学特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):1064. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05932-w.
6
Psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Uganda.《EORTC QLQ-C30 在乌干达的心理测量特性》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 23;19(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01769-x.
7
Assessing the scalability of a health management-strengthening intervention at the district level: a qualitative study in Ghana, Malawi and Uganda.评估一项在地区层面加强卫生管理的干预措施的可扩展性:在加纳、马拉维和乌干达的定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Jul 30;20(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00887-2.
8
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
9
Psychometric properties of an arabic translation of the short form of Weinstein noise sensitivity scale (NSS-SF) in a community sample of adolescents.信度和效度研究:青少年社区样本中 Weinstein 噪音敏感性量表(NSS-SF)短式中文版的信度和效度。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Nov 8;11(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01433-7.
10
Professional Identity in Nursing Scale 2.0: A national study of nurses' professional identity and psychometric properties.护理专业认同量表 2.0:一项全国范围内护士专业认同及心理测量学特性的研究。
J Prof Nurs. 2024 Jan-Feb;50:61-65. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.11.004. Epub 2023 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Management capacity of primary healthcare facilities in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.低收入和中等收入国家基层医疗设施的管理能力:一项范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 23;5(7):e0004445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004445. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the evidence for best practice guidelines in supportive supervision of lay health care providers in humanitarian emergencies: A systematic scoping review.在人道主义紧急情况下对非专业医疗保健提供者进行支持性监督的最佳实践指南的证据评估:系统范围审查。
J Glob Health. 2022 Feb 27;12:04017. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.04017. eCollection 2022.
2
Managers do it their way: How managers act in a decentralised healthcare services provider organisation - a mixed methods study.管理者各显神通:去中心化医疗服务提供商组织中管理者的行为方式——混合方法研究
Health Serv Manage Res. 2022 Nov;35(4):215-228. doi: 10.1177/09514848211065467. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
3
Burden of disease among the world's poorest billion people: An expert-informed secondary analysis of Global Burden of Disease estimates.
全球最贫困的 10 亿人口的疾病负担:基于全球疾病负担估计的专家二次分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 16;16(8):e0253073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253073. eCollection 2021.
4
Interventions to strengthen the leadership capabilities of health professionals in Sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.加强撒哈拉以南非洲卫生专业人员领导能力的干预措施:一项范围综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2021 Mar 3;36(1):117-133. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa078.
5
Transforming capacity-strengthening in an era of sustainable development.在可持续发展时代转变能力建设
Int J Public Health. 2020 Dec;65(9):1519-1520. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01490-4. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Understanding the impact of a collective leadership intervention on team working and safety culture in healthcare teams: a realist evaluation protocol.了解集体领导干预对医疗团队协作和安全文化的影响:一项现实主义评价方案。
HRB Open Res. 2020 Mar 26;2:5. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12860.2. eCollection 2019.
7
EBP Implementation Leadership of Frontline Nurse Managers: Validation of the Implementation Leadership Scale in Acute Care.一线护士长的 EBP 实施领导力:急性护理中实施领导力量表的验证。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Feb;17(1):82-91. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12402. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
8
Introduction to the Special Issue on "Effective Leadership for Health Systems".“卫生系统有效领导力”特刊引言
Health Syst Reform. 2016 Jul 2;2(3):171-175. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2016.1223978.
9
Understanding organisational culture for healthcare quality improvement.理解组织文化以提升医疗质量。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4907. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4907.
10
A new tool to measure approaches to supervision from the perspective of community health workers: a prospective, longitudinal, validation study in seven countries.一种从社区卫生工作者角度衡量监督方法的新工具:一项在七个国家开展的前瞻性纵向验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 22;18(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3595-7.