Suppr超能文献

探讨孕前 BMI、孕期体重增加和营养摄入之间的关系:来自中国山东的真实世界研究。

Exploring the relationships between pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain, and nutritional intake: a real-world investigation in Shandong, China.

机构信息

Jinan Maternity and Child Care Hospital, Jinan, China.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2024 Mar 22;12:e17099. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17099. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

This study investigated the associations between gestational weight gain (GWG), pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), and prenatal diet quality in pregnant women from Shandong, China. We analyzed a sample of 532 early-stage pregnant women registered at an outpatient clinic. Diet quality was evaluated using the Chinese Healthy Dietary Index for Pregnancy (CHDI-P), encompassing three dimensions: diversity, adequacy, and limitation, with an overall score out of 100. Dietary intake was documented 24-h dietary recalls spanning three consecutive days and subsequently translated to a CHDI-P score. At the time of enrollment, BMI was measured on-site and classified as underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), and obese (≥30.0). Pregnant women were also categorized into inadequate, adequate, and excessive weight gain groups based on their GWG. We employed a Tukey-adjusted generalized linear model to compare the CHDI-P scores between the pre-pregnancy BMI groups and GWG groups. The results revealed that the underweight group had significantly higher total scores and limitation total scores on the CHDI-P ( < 0.001). Conversely, the overweight and obese groups were more susceptible to suboptimal dietary quality. Notably, the inadequate weight gain group displayed significantly elevated food adequacy scores compared to the other two groups ( < 0.05). This indicates that greater GWGs do not necessarily align with principles of adequate nutrition.

摘要

本研究调查了中国山东孕妇的妊娠体重增加(GWG)、孕前体重指数(BMI)和产前饮食质量之间的关联。我们分析了一个在门诊登记的 532 名早期孕妇的样本。饮食质量使用中国孕期健康饮食指数(CHDI-P)进行评估,涵盖三个维度:多样性、充足性和限制,总分 100 分。通过 24 小时连续三天的饮食回忆记录饮食摄入情况,并将其转化为 CHDI-P 分数。在入组时,现场测量 BMI 并分类为体重不足(<18.5)、正常体重(18.5-24.9)、超重(25.0-29.9)和肥胖(≥30.0)。根据 GWG,孕妇还分为体重不足、体重适当和体重过度增加组。我们采用 Tukey 调整的广义线性模型比较了孕前 BMI 组和 GWG 组之间的 CHDI-P 评分。结果表明,体重不足组的 CHDI-P 总分和限制总分明显更高(<0.001)。相反,超重和肥胖组的饮食质量较差。值得注意的是,体重不足组的食物充足分数明显高于其他两组(<0.05)。这表明更大的 GWG 并不一定符合充足营养的原则。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b4a/10962341/4584120d7707/peerj-12-17099-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验