• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Accessibility and Usability of Online Job Applications for Screen Reader Users.屏幕阅读器用户在线求职申请的可访问性和可用性
J Vis Impair Blind. 2023 Nov-Dec;117(6):479-490. doi: 10.1177/0145482x231216757. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
Non-visual Web Browsing: Beyond Web Accessibility.非视觉网络浏览:超越网络可访问性
Univers Access Hum Comput Interact (2017). 2017 Jul;10278:322-334. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-58703-5_24. Epub 2017 May 16.
3
Towards Enhancing Blind Users' Interaction Experience with Online Videos via Motion Gestures.通过动作手势增强视障用户与在线视频的交互体验
HT ACM Conf Hypertext Soc Media. 2021 Aug;2021:231-236. doi: 10.1145/3465336.3475116.
4
Editing Wikipedia content by screen reader: easier interaction with the Accessible Rich Internet Applications suite.使用屏幕阅读器编辑维基百科内容:与可访问富互联网应用套件的交互更便捷。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009 Jul;4(4):264-75. doi: 10.1080/17483100902903457.
5
Implementing Recommendations From Web Accessibility Guidelines: A Comparative Study of Nondisabled Users and Users With Visual Impairments.实施网络无障碍指南的建议:非残疾用户与视力障碍用户的比较研究
Hum Factors. 2017 Sep;59(6):956-972. doi: 10.1177/0018720817708397. Epub 2017 May 3.
6
How accessible are the websites of health services for people who have had a stroke?中风患者获取医疗服务网站的途径如何?
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 24;24(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02459-6.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Development of the AASPIRE Web Accessibility Guidelines for Autistic Web Users.面向自闭症网络用户的AASPIRE网络可访问性指南的制定。
Autism Adulthood. 2019 Jun 1;1(2):146-157. doi: 10.1089/aut.2018.0020. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
9
Access to digital library databases in higher education: design problems and infrastructural gaps.高等教育中数字图书馆数据库的获取:设计问题与基础设施差距。
Work. 2014;48(3):307-17. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131791.
10
Rotate-and-Press: A Non-visual Alternative to Point-and-Click?旋转并按压:一种替代点击操作的非视觉方式?
HCI Int 2020 Late Break Posters (2020). 2020 Jul;12426:291-305. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-60149-2_23. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

屏幕阅读器用户在线求职申请的可访问性和可用性

The Accessibility and Usability of Online Job Applications for Screen Reader Users.

作者信息

Reuschel William, McDonnall Michele, Burton Darren

机构信息

American Foundation for the Blind.

The National Research & Training Center on Blindness & Low Vision, Mississippi State University.

出版信息

J Vis Impair Blind. 2023 Nov-Dec;117(6):479-490. doi: 10.1177/0145482x231216757. Epub 2023 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1177/0145482x231216757
PMID:38529353
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10961918/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated the accessibility and usability of online job applications by individuals with visual impairments who use screen readers.

METHOD

Three blind, experienced screen reader users on the research team attempted to complete online job applications from 30 randomly selected Fortune 500 companies, with 90 application trials attempted. Each tester used a different screen reader and browser combination.

RESULTS

The testers experienced significant barriers to completing the online job applications: 50 of 90 (55.6%) attempts were successful, but 23 of the 30 (76.7%) sites had critical issues that prevented at least one tester from completing the application. Testers found 694 accessibility issues and gave an average ease of use rating of 3.60 (SD=1.05) out of 5 for the job application sites. Twenty-six of the job application sites were created by eight job application software vendors, with significant variation in accessibility across different applications using the same vendor.

DISCUSSION

The accessibility and usability issues identified with the majority of online job applications evaluated present an unnecessary barrier to employment for screen reader users. While the 55.6% success rate found in this study is considerably higher compared to previous research, only 23.3% of the job application sites were accessible to all three screen readers.

IMPLICATIONS

Job application software vendors and companies that create their own online job applications should take a Universal Design approach by following the WCAG guidelines and implementing recommended solutions to increase the accessibility of their applications. Software vendors are encouraged to only offer accessible options for creating online job applications, such that companies would not be able to create an inaccessible form.

摘要

引言

本研究调查了使用屏幕阅读器的视障人士在线求职申请的可访问性和可用性。

方法

研究团队中的三名失明且经验丰富的屏幕阅读器用户尝试完成从30家随机挑选的财富500强公司获取的在线求职申请,共进行了90次申请尝试。每位测试人员使用不同的屏幕阅读器和浏览器组合。

结果

测试人员在完成在线求职申请时遇到了重大障碍:90次尝试中有50次(55.6%)成功,但30个网站中有23个(76.7%)存在严重问题,导致至少一名测试人员无法完成申请。测试人员发现了694个可访问性问题,对求职申请网站的易用性平均评分为3.60(标准差=1.05)(满分5分)。26个求职申请网站由8家求职应用软件供应商创建,同一供应商的不同应用在可访问性方面存在显著差异。

讨论

在评估的大多数在线求职申请中发现的可访问性和可用性问题,对屏幕阅读器用户的就业构成了不必要的障碍。虽然本研究中发现的55.6%的成功率比之前的研究高得多,但只有23.3%的求职申请网站对所有三款屏幕阅读器都可访问。

启示

求职应用软件供应商以及创建自己在线求职申请的公司应采用通用设计方法,遵循网络内容无障碍指南(WCAG)并实施推荐的解决方案,以提高其应用的可访问性。鼓励软件供应商仅提供可访问的在线求职申请创建选项,这样公司就无法创建不可访问的表单。