Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Applied Information Technology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2243848. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43848.
Persistent pain is a common and disabling health problem that is often difficult to treat. There is an increasing interest in medicinal cannabis for treatment of persistent pain; however, the limited superiority of cannabinoids over placebo in clinical trials suggests that positive expectations may contribute to the improvements.
To evaluate the size of placebo responses in randomized clinical trials in which cannabinoids were compared with placebo in the treatment of pain and to correlate these responses to objective estimates of media attention.
A systematic literature search was conducted within the MEDLINE and Embase databases. Studies published until September 2021 were considered.
Cannabinoid studies with a double-blind, placebo-controlled design with participants 18 years or older with clinical pain of any duration were included. Studies were excluded if they treated individuals with HIV/AIDS or severe skin disorders.
The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses reporting guideline. Data were extracted by independent reviewers. Quality assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool. Attention and dissemination metrics for each trial were extracted from Altmetric and Crossref. Data were pooled and analyzed using a random-effects statistical model.
Change in pain intensity from before to after treatment, measured as bias-corrected standardized mean difference (Hedges g).
Twenty studies, including 1459 individuals (mean [SD] age, 51 [7] years; age range, 33-62 years; 815 female [56%]), were included. Pain intensity was associated with a significant reduction in response to placebo, with a moderate to large effect size (mean [SE] Hedges g, 0.64 [0.13]; P < .001). Trials with low risk of bias had greater placebo responses (q1 = 5.47; I2 = 87.08; P = .02). The amount of media attention and dissemination linked to each trial was proportionally high, with a strong positive bias, but was not associated with the clinical outcomes.
Placebo contributes significantly to pain reduction seen in cannabinoid clinical trials. The positive media attention and wide dissemination may uphold high expectations and shape placebo responses in future trials, which has the potential to affect the outcome of clinical trials, regulatory decisions, clinical practice, and ultimately patient access to cannabinoids for pain relief.
持续性疼痛是一种常见且使人丧失能力的健康问题,通常难以治疗。人们对药用大麻治疗持续性疼痛越来越感兴趣;然而,临床试验中大麻素相对于安慰剂的有限优势表明,积极的预期可能有助于改善。
评估大麻素与安慰剂治疗疼痛的随机临床试验中安慰剂反应的大小,并将这些反应与对媒体关注度的客观估计相关联。
在 MEDLINE 和 Embase 数据库中进行了系统文献检索。考虑了截至 2021 年 9 月发表的研究。
纳入了具有双盲、安慰剂对照设计的大麻素研究,参与者为年龄在 18 岁或以上、有任何持续时间的临床疼痛的患者。如果研究对象为艾滋病毒/艾滋病或严重皮肤疾病患者,则将其排除在外。
该研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目报告准则。数据由独立评审员提取。使用风险偏差 2 工具进行质量评估。从 Altmetric 和 Crossref 中提取每个试验的关注度和传播度指标。使用随机效应统计模型对数据进行汇总和分析。
治疗前后疼痛强度的变化,以偏倚校正的标准化均数差(Hedges g)表示。
纳入了 20 项研究,包括 1459 名个体(平均[标准差]年龄为 51[7]岁;年龄范围为 33-62 岁;815 名女性[56%])。疼痛强度与安慰剂反应显著降低相关,具有中到大的效应量(平均[标准差]Hedges g,0.64[0.13];P<.001)。低风险偏倚的试验具有更大的安慰剂反应(q1=5.47;I2=87.08;P=.02)。与每个试验相关的媒体关注度和传播度比例很高,具有强烈的正偏差,但与临床结果无关。
安慰剂显著促进了大麻素临床试验中疼痛的减轻。积极的媒体关注度和广泛的传播可能会维持高期望,并塑造未来试验中的安慰剂反应,这有可能影响临床试验、监管决策、临床实践以及最终患者获得大麻素缓解疼痛的机会。