Suppr超能文献

无支配的财富创造。公司的信托责任。

Wealth creation without domination. The fiduciary duties of corporations.

作者信息

Claassen Rutger

机构信息

Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Rev Int Soc Political Philos. 2022 Aug 18;27(3):317-338. doi: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2113224. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Corporations wield power in today's economies, and political theories of the corporation argue about the legitimacy conditions of corporate power. This paper argues in favour of a double-fiduciary theory for corporations. Based on a concession theory of markets, it sees all markets as authorized by states (in the name of society), for the purpose of creating economic value, or wealth. Hence corporations, as much as non-incorporated firms, have a fiduciary duty to the state/society to create wealth, in the competitive structure of the market. However, their pursuit of wealth often creates unbalanced relations of power between corporations and their stakeholders, which can at some point be classified as instances of domination. Therefore, corporations need to be subjected to a second fiduciary duty, i.e. not to dominate others in the economy. This duty is also, in the final instance, owed to the state/society. In an era when everyone can incorporate their business, states/societies can be interpreted as having, through corporate law, mandated shareholders as 'proximate beneficiaries', to incentivize corporations to create wealth. Now states/societies need to think about how to prevent corporations from dominating others. New mechanisms of accountability towards stakeholders and/or citizens as proximate beneficiaries are needed. Only in this way can corporations be effectively held to account for both of the fiduciary duties which characterize their normative status.

摘要

企业在当今经济中行使权力,而关于企业的政治理论则围绕企业权力的合法性条件展开争论。本文主张一种适用于企业的双重受托理论。基于市场的特许权理论,它将所有市场视为由国家(以社会的名义)授权,目的是创造经济价值或财富。因此,企业与非公司制企业一样,在市场的竞争结构中,对国家/社会负有创造财富的受托责任。然而,它们对财富的追求往往会在企业与其利益相关者之间造成权力关系的失衡,在某些时候这种失衡可被归类为支配的情形。所以,企业需要承担第二项受托责任,即不在经济中支配他人。这一责任最终也是对国家/社会所负有的。在一个人人都可以将自己的业务公司化的时代,国家/社会可以被理解为通过公司法将股东指定为“直接受益人”,以激励企业创造财富。现在,国家/社会需要思考如何防止企业支配他人。需要建立针对利益相关者和/或作为直接受益人的公民的新问责机制。只有这样,才能有效地让企业对构成其规范地位的两项受托责任负责。

相似文献

1
Wealth creation without domination. The fiduciary duties of corporations.无支配的财富创造。公司的信托责任。
Crit Rev Int Soc Political Philos. 2022 Aug 18;27(3):317-338. doi: 10.1080/13698230.2022.2113224. eCollection 2024.
2
Political theories of the business corporation.商业公司的政治理论。
Philos Compass. 2023 Jan;18(1):e12892. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12892. Epub 2022 Dec 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验