Paredes-Céspedes Diana Marcela, Vélez Norida, Parada-López Alejandra, Toloza-Pérez Yesith Guillermo, Téllez Eliana M, Portilla Claudia, González Carolina, Blandón Leany, Santacruz Juan Carlos, Malagón-Rojas Jeadran
Grupo de Salud Ambiental y Laboral, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Dirección de Investigación, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Fundación Colombiana del Corazón, Bogotá 111311, Colombia.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Mar 7;14(3):609-622. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14030040.
Mental well-being plays a pivotal role within the broader spectrum of health and illness, encompassing factors such as stress, depression, and anxiety. Nature-based therapeutic interventions have emerged as a promising approach to addressing these mental health challenges. This study seeks to assess the impact of these interventions on stress, depression, and anxiety levels.
We conducted an extensive search for randomized clinical trials that examined stress, anxiety, and depression levels. The selected studies underwent a rigorous risk-of-bias assessment following the guidelines outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews.
Our review encompassed findings from eight publications. Among them, two studies measuring cortisol levels revealed significant differences between the pre-test and post-test measurements within the intervention groups. In two studies that employed the Stress Response Inventory, a significant decrease in stress levels was observed within the intervention groups in contrast to the control groups. However, no significant differences were noted in studies that utilized the Restorative Outcome Scale. In the assessment of anxiety and depression levels, three studies employed the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, while four studies utilized The Profile of Mood States scale; none of these studies demonstrated significant differences.
The current body of evidence offers limited support for advocating nature-based therapeutic interventions as a primary approach to reducing stress, depression, and anxiety.
心理健康在更广泛的健康与疾病范畴中起着关键作用,涵盖压力、抑郁和焦虑等因素。基于自然的治疗性干预已成为应对这些心理健康挑战的一种有前景的方法。本研究旨在评估这些干预对压力、抑郁和焦虑水平的影响。
我们广泛检索了考察压力、焦虑和抑郁水平的随机临床试验。所选研究依据《Cochrane系统评价手册》中概述的指南进行了严格的偏倚风险评估。
我们的综述涵盖了八项出版物的研究结果。其中,两项测量皮质醇水平的研究显示干预组内测试前和测试后的测量结果存在显著差异。在两项使用压力反应量表的研究中,与对照组相比,干预组的压力水平显著降低。然而,在使用恢复性结果量表的研究中未发现显著差异。在焦虑和抑郁水平评估方面,三项研究采用了正负情绪量表,四项研究使用了情绪状态剖面图量表;这些研究均未显示出显著差异。
目前的证据体系对主张将基于自然的治疗性干预作为减轻压力、抑郁和焦虑的主要方法提供的支持有限。