• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

军事人员对逆境的适应力:自我调节的作用。

Resiliency to adversity in military personnel: The role of self-regulation.

作者信息

McLarnon Matthew J W, Rothstein Mitchell G, King Gillian A

机构信息

Bissett School of Business, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada.

DAN Department of Management and Organizational Studies, Western University, London, Canada.

出版信息

Mil Psychol. 2021 Apr 1;33(2):104-114. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1897492. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1080/08995605.2021.1897492
PMID:38536349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10013496/
Abstract

Military service can include numerous adverse events. As such, resiliency has been considered as a means of potentially helping active-duty personnel face adversity and be better prepared for the demands of military service. However, research in military contexts has been hindered by use of disparate conceptualizations, definitions, and measures of resiliency. To provide some resolution to these inconsistencies, we use a comprehensive, theoretically based model of resiliency to explore how self-regulation processes contributed to Soldiers' negative affect and self-perceived effectiveness. We hypothesized that self-regulation (comprising distinct affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes) increments prediction of Soldiers' outcomes over and above trait-based resiliency protective factors. Using a sample of active-duty military personnel, cognitive self-regulation and affective self-regulation incremented the prediction of negative affect and self-perceived Soldier effectiveness, respectively, over and above trait-based protective factors. These results support the use of a comprehensive model and measure of resiliency, which may enable greater consistency across future research endeavors. As these results validated the links between self-regulation and post-adversity outcomes, this study provides a basis for developing new resiliency training programs. Additional implications for theory and continued research on resiliency in military contexts are discussed.

摘要

军事服役可能包括众多不良事件。因此,心理韧性被视为一种可能帮助现役人员面对逆境并更好地应对军事服役需求的方式。然而,军事背景下的研究受到心理韧性概念化、定义和测量方法不一致的阻碍。为了解决这些不一致问题,我们使用一个基于理论的全面心理韧性模型来探讨自我调节过程如何影响士兵的负面影响和自我效能感。我们假设自我调节(包括不同的情感、行为和认知过程)在基于特质的心理韧性保护因素之上,增加了对士兵结果的预测。通过对现役军事人员的抽样研究,认知自我调节和情感自我调节分别在基于特质的保护因素之上,增加了对负面影响和自我效能感的预测。这些结果支持使用全面的心理韧性模型和测量方法,这可能使未来的研究更加一致。由于这些结果验证了自我调节与逆境后结果之间的联系,本研究为开发新的心理韧性训练计划提供了基础。文中还讨论了该研究对军事背景下心理韧性理论和持续研究的其他影响。

相似文献

1
Resiliency to adversity in military personnel: The role of self-regulation.军事人员对逆境的适应力:自我调节的作用。
Mil Psychol. 2021 Apr 1;33(2):104-114. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1897492. eCollection 2021.
2
Enhancing resiliency and optimizing readiness in military personnel through psychological flexibility training: design and methodology of a randomized controlled trial.通过心理灵活性训练增强军事人员的复原力并优化战备状态:一项随机对照试验的设计与方法
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 5;14:1299532. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1299532. eCollection 2023.
3
Resiliency among United States Air Force personnel: The direct and interactive influence of cognitive fitness and confidence in social connections.美国空军人员的复原力:认知健康和社交关系信心的直接及交互影响。
Mil Psychol. 2025;37(5):451-463. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2024.2398832. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
4
Traumatic brain injury resiliency model: a conceptual model to guide rehabilitation research and practice.创伤性脑损伤恢复力模型:指导康复研究与实践的概念模型。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Nov;41(22):2708-2717. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1474495. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
5
Workplace victimization risk and protective factors for suicidal behavior among active duty military personnel.现役军人工作场所受害风险和自杀行为的保护因素。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Aug 15;236:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.095. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
6
Relationships between team characteristics and soldiers' organizational commitment and well-being: the mediating role of psychological resilience.团队特征与士兵组织承诺及幸福感之间的关系:心理韧性的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 29;15:1353793. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1353793. eCollection 2024.
7
Resiliency in the Face of Adversity: A Short Longitudinal Test of the Trait Hypothesis.面对逆境时的复原力:特质假设的短期纵向测试
J Gen Psychol. 2017 Apr-Jun;144(2):89-109. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2016.1276043. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
8
The Relationship Between Army Soldiers' Perceived Stress and Army Life Adjustment: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Stress Response and the Moderating Effect of Cohesion.陆军士兵感知压力与军队生活适应的关系:聚焦于应激反应的中介作用和凝聚力的调节作用
Mil Med. 2020 Sep 18;185(9-10):e1743-e1749. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa114.
9
'Nutrition is out of our control': soldiers' perceptions of their local food environment.“营养是我们无法控制的”:士兵对当地食物环境的看法。
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Oct;22(15):2766-2776. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019001381. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
Self-focused and other-focused resiliency: Plausible mechanisms linking early family adversity to health problems in college women.自我聚焦和他人聚焦的心理韧性:将早期家庭逆境与大学女生健康问题相联系的合理机制。
J Am Coll Health. 2016;64(2):85-95. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1075994.

引用本文的文献

1
Prioritizing competencies for soldier's mental resilience: an application of integrative fuzzy-trapezoidal decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory in updating training program.确定士兵心理复原力的能力优先级:模糊梯形综合决策试验与评价实验室在更新训练计划中的应用
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 5;14:1239481. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1239481. eCollection 2023.
2
The effect of cadet resilience on self-efficacy and professional achievement: verification of the moderated mediating effect of vocational calling.军校学员心理韧性对自我效能感和职业成就的影响:职业使命感调节中介效应的验证
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1330969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1330969. eCollection 2023.
3
Resilience in Army STARRS: Evaluating psychometrics of a multi-dimensional resilience measure.军队 STARRS 中的韧性:评估多维韧性衡量标准的心理计量学。
Mil Psychol. 2023 Nov-Dec;35(6):521-528. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2022.2131187. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing resiliency in paediatric rehabilitation: A critical review of assessment tools and applications.评估儿科康复中的适应能力:评估工具及其应用的批判性回顾。
Child Care Health Dev. 2020 May;46(3):249-267. doi: 10.1111/cch.12743. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
2
Self-Regulation Shift Theory: A Dynamic Personal Agency Approach to Recovery Capital and Methodological Suggestions.自我调节转变理论:一种关于恢复资本的动态个人能动性方法及方法论建议。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 21;9:1738. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01738. eCollection 2018.
3
Is prevention better than cure? A systematic review of the effectiveness of well-being interventions for military personnel adjusting to civilian life.预防胜于治疗?对适应平民生活的军事人员进行幸福感干预的有效性的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 May 2;13(5):e0190144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190144. eCollection 2018.
4
Narrative approach in understanding the drivers for resilience of military combat medics.理解军事战斗医护人员恢复力驱动因素的叙事方法。
J R Army Med Corps. 2018 Jul;164(3):155-159. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2017-000877. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
5
Enhancing Resilience in Active Duty Military Personnel.增强现役军人的复原力。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2017 Feb 1;55(2):44-48. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20170210-06.
6
Promoting Psychological Resilience in the U.S. Military.提升美国军队的心理适应能力。
Rand Health Q. 2011 Jun 1;1(2):2. eCollection 2011 Summer.
7
Psychological resilience in U.S. military veterans: A 2-year, nationally representative prospective cohort study.美国退伍军人的心理复原力:一项为期两年、具有全国代表性的前瞻性队列研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Jan;84:301-309. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
8
Regulatory Flexibility: An Individual Differences Perspective on Coping and Emotion Regulation.监管弹性:应对和情绪调节的个体差异视角。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov;8(6):591-612. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504116.
9
A longitudinal pilot study of resilience in Canadian military personnel.一项关于加拿大军事人员复原力的纵向试点研究。
Stress Health. 2014 Dec;30(5):377-85. doi: 10.1002/smi.2614.
10
The efficacy of resiliency training programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.复原力训练项目的疗效:随机试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 27;9(10):e111420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111420. eCollection 2014.