Department of Microbiology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India.
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2024 Mar-Apr;48:100575. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100575. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
Quantitative LAMP (qLAMP) assay is one of the recent and emerging diagnostic tests for infectious diseases. Only a few studies exist comparing this assay with quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for the diagnosis of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD).
To compare the diagnostic performance of qLAMP assay with qPCR targeting autolysin gene for the diagnosis of invasive pneumococcal disease.
Ninety six blood samples and 73 CSF samples from patients clinically suspected with community acquired pneumonia and acute meningitis were tested by qPCR and qLAMP assays using previously published primers and protocols. The qPCR was considered as the gold standard test and the diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and kappa coefficient for the level of agreement between the tests. Chi-squared/Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables (positive/negative).
Thirty two blood samples and 22 CSF samples were positive by qPCR while 24 and 20 samples were positive by qLAMP assay respectively. The sensitivity of qLAMP assay was only 86.4% and 75% when tested on CSF and blood samples respectively. However, the qLAMP assay was in substantial to almost perfect agreement when compared with qPCR. The results were statistically significant in both sample types (P < 0.001).
The performance of qLAMP assay can vary based on the specimen type. It has very high specificity and had substantial to almost perfect agreement, and thus may be an alternative to qPCR for the diagnosis of IPD.
实时环介导等温扩增(qLAMP)检测是最近新兴的一种传染病诊断检测方法。目前仅有少数研究将该检测方法与针对自溶酶基因的实时荧光定量 PCR(qPCR)检测方法用于侵袭性肺炎球菌病(IPD)的诊断进行比较。
比较 qLAMP 检测方法与靶向自溶酶基因的 qPCR 检测方法用于诊断侵袭性肺炎球菌病的诊断性能。
采用已发表的引物和方案,通过 qPCR 和 qLAMP 检测法对 96 份疑似社区获得性肺炎和急性脑膜炎患者的血样和 73 份脑脊液样本进行检测。qPCR 被视为金标准检测方法,通过计算敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值以及两种检测方法之间的一致性的kappa 系数来评估诊断性能。采用卡方检验/Fisher 确切概率法比较分类变量(阳性/阴性)。
qPCR 检测法对 32 份血样和 22 份脑脊液样本呈阳性,qLAMP 检测法对 24 份血样和 20 份脑脊液样本呈阳性。当分别对脑脊液和血液样本进行检测时,qLAMP 检测法的敏感性仅为 86.4%和 75%。然而,与 qPCR 相比,qLAMP 检测法具有高度的一致性。两种样本类型的结果均具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。
qLAMP 检测法的性能可能因标本类型而异。它具有非常高的特异性,且具有高度一致性,因此可能是 qPCR 用于诊断 IPD 的替代方法。