Suppr超能文献

颅内手术期间术中阿片类药物和非阿片类药物使用的变异性:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。

Variability in Intraoperative Opioid and Nonopioid Utilization During Intracranial Surgery: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Naik Bhiken I, Lele Abhijit V, Sharma Deepak, Akkermans Annemarie, Vlisides Phillip E, Colquhoun Douglas A, Domino Karen B, Tsang Siny, Sun Eric, Dunn Lauren K

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

Department of Anesthesiology University of Washington, WA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2025 Jan 1;37(1):70-74. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000960. Epub 2024 Mar 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Key goals during intracranial surgery are to facilitate rapid emergence and extubation for early neurologic evaluation. Longer-acting opioids are often avoided or administered at subtherapeutic doses due to their perceived risk of sedation and delayed emergence. However, inadequate analgesia and increased postoperative pain are common after intracranial surgery. In this multicenter study, we describe variability in opioid and nonopioid administration patterns in patients undergoing intracranial surgery.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective observational cohort study using the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group database. Opioid and nonopioid practice patterns in 31,217 cases undergoing intracranial surgery across 11 institutions in the United States are described.

RESULTS

Across all 11 institutions, total median [interquartile range] oral morphine equivalents, normalized to weight and anesthesia duration was 0.17 (0.08 to 0.3) mg.kg.min -1 . There was a 7-fold difference in oral morphine equivalents between the lowest (0.05 [0.02 to 0.13] mg.kg.min -1 ) and highest (0.36 [0.18 to 0.54] mg.kg.min -1 ) prescribing institutions. Patients undergoing supratentorial surgery had higher normalized oral morphine equivalents compared with those having infratentorial surgery [0.17 [0.08-0.31] vs. 0.15 [0.07-0.27] mg/kg/min -1 ; P <0.001); however, this difference is clinically small. Nonopioid analgesics were not administered in 20% to 96.8% of cases across institutions.

CONCLUSION

This study found wide variability for both opioid and nonopioid utilization at an institutional level. Future work on practitioner-level opioid and nonopioid use and its impact on outcomes after intracranial surgery should be conducted.

摘要

背景

颅内手术的关键目标是促进快速苏醒和拔管,以便早期进行神经功能评估。由于长效阿片类药物存在镇静风险和苏醒延迟的问题,人们通常避免使用或给予低于治疗剂量的此类药物。然而,颅内手术后镇痛不足和术后疼痛加剧的情况很常见。在这项多中心研究中,我们描述了颅内手术患者阿片类药物和非阿片类药物给药模式的差异。

方法

这是一项使用多中心围手术期结局组数据库的多中心回顾性观察队列研究。描述了美国11家机构中31217例颅内手术患者的阿片类药物和非阿片类药物使用模式。

结果

在所有11家机构中,根据体重和麻醉持续时间标准化后的口服吗啡当量中位数[四分位间距]为0.17(0.08至0.3)mg·kg·min⁻¹。处方量最低(0.05[0.02至0.13]mg·kg·min⁻¹)和最高(0.36[0.18至0.54]mg·kg·min⁻¹)的机构之间,口服吗啡当量相差7倍。与幕下手术患者相比,幕上手术患者的标准化口服吗啡当量更高[0.17[0.08 - 0.31] vs. 0.15[0.07 - 0.27]mg/kg/min⁻¹;P<0.001];然而,这种差异在临床上较小。各机构中20%至96.8%的病例未使用非阿片类镇痛药。

结论

本研究发现,在机构层面,阿片类药物和非阿片类药物的使用存在很大差异。未来应开展关于医生层面阿片类药物和非阿片类药物使用及其对颅内手术后结局影响的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ea/11436478/38f1be30eb52/nihms-1984928-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验