• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较不同解剖性肺切除术电视辅助胸腔镜手术方式的即刻术后结果:单中心回顾性研究。

Comparing immediate postoperative outcomes of different VATS approaches for anatomical lung resection: a single-centre retrospective study.

机构信息

From the Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Lorange); the Division of Thoracic and Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Que. (Katz, Spicer); the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C. (Huynh).

出版信息

Can J Surg. 2024 Mar 28;67(2):E142-E148. doi: 10.1503/cjs.010622. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.

DOI:10.1503/cjs.010622
PMID:38548299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10980531/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) can be performed through 1 or more intercostal or subxiphoid ports. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether number and location of ports had an impact on early perioperative outcomes and postoperative pain after anatomical lung resection (ALR).

METHODS

A search of the departmental electronic database identified all patients who underwent VATS ALR between June 2018 and June 2019. We stratified patients according to the surgical approach: 2-port VATS, 3-port VATS, and subxiphoid VATS. We extracted demographic and clinicopathologic data. We used univariate analysis with unpaired tests and χ tests to compare these variables between the subgroups.

RESULTS

We included 201 patients in the analysis. When patients were stratified by surgical approach, there was no difference in terms of age, disease load, length of surgery, postoperative complications, duration of pleural drainage, and length of hospital stay. Postoperative pain and morphine equivalent usage were also comparable between the groups. According to these results, number and location of VATS ports seemingly has no clinical impact on early postoperative outcomes. Limitations of the study include its retrospective nature, small sample size, and short follow-up interval.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that incision location and the number of VATS ports is not associated with differences in the incidence of perioperative complications or postoperative pain. Given the limitations described above, further studies with longer follow-up intervals are required to explore the lasting impact of this surgical approach on quality of life.

摘要

背景

电视辅助胸腔镜手术 (VATS) 可通过 1 个或多个肋间或剑突下入路进行。本研究旨在评估切口位置和数量对解剖性肺切除术 (ALR) 后早期围手术期结局和术后疼痛的影响。

方法

通过部门电子数据库检索,确定了 2018 年 6 月至 2019 年 6 月期间接受 VATS-ALR 的所有患者。我们根据手术方法对患者进行分层:2 端口 VATS、3 端口 VATS 和剑突下入路 VATS。我们提取了人口统计学和临床病理学数据。我们使用单变量分析和独立样本 t 检验和 χ 检验来比较这些变量在亚组之间的差异。

结果

我们对 201 名患者进行了分析。当根据手术方法对患者进行分层时,年龄、疾病负荷、手术时间、术后并发症、胸腔引流时间和住院时间在各组之间无差异。术后疼痛和吗啡等效用量也无差异。根据这些结果,VATS 端口的数量和位置似乎对术后早期结果没有临床影响。该研究的局限性包括其回顾性、样本量小和随访时间短。

结论

我们的结果表明,切口位置和 VATS 端口的数量与围手术期并发症或术后疼痛的发生率无差异。鉴于上述局限性,需要进行更长随访时间的进一步研究,以探讨这种手术方法对生活质量的持久影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbce/10980531/bbb7ac766f43/067e142f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbce/10980531/c50cc6e73499/067e142f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbce/10980531/ac73cddc652a/067e142f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbce/10980531/bbb7ac766f43/067e142f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbce/10980531/c50cc6e73499/067e142f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbce/10980531/ac73cddc652a/067e142f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbce/10980531/bbb7ac766f43/067e142f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing immediate postoperative outcomes of different VATS approaches for anatomical lung resection: a single-centre retrospective study.比较不同解剖性肺切除术电视辅助胸腔镜手术方式的即刻术后结果:单中心回顾性研究。
Can J Surg. 2024 Mar 28;67(2):E142-E148. doi: 10.1503/cjs.010622. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.
2
A prospective multi-institutional study to verify the non-inferiority of postoperative pain in robot-assisted thoracic surgery in comparison with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: The Japanese RATS interest group 01 (J-RATSIG 01).一项验证机器人辅助胸外科手术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗肺癌术后疼痛非劣效性的多中心前瞻性研究:日本机器人辅助胸外科手术兴趣小组 01 期(J-RATSIG 01)。
Lung Cancer. 2024 Oct;196:107961. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107961. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
3
Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial.电视辅助胸腔镜手术与前外侧开胸术行肺叶切除术治疗早期肺癌的术后疼痛与生活质量比较:一项随机对照研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):836-844. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X. Epub 2016 May 6.
4
Pain following thoracoscopic surgery: retrospective analysis between single-incision and three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.胸腔镜手术后疼痛:单孔与三孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术的回顾性分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jun 12;8:153. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-8-153.
5
Does the length of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy affect postoperative pain? Results of a randomized controlled trial.单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术的长度是否会影响术后疼痛?一项随机对照试验的结果。
Thorac Cancer. 2020 Jul;11(7):1765-1772. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13291. Epub 2020 May 7.
6
Subxiphoid vs intercostal single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: A randomised controlled trial.剑突下入路与肋间单切口电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2016 Jun;30:99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery could reduce postoperative thorax drainage for lung cancer patients.单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术可减少肺癌患者术后胸腔引流。
Thorac Cancer. 2019 Jun;10(6):1334-1339. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13040. Epub 2019 May 15.
8
[Comparison Study of Post-operative Pain and Short-term Quality of Life between Uniportal and Three Portal Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery for Radical Lung Cancer Resection].单孔与三孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术根治性肺癌切除术后疼痛及短期生活质量的比较研究
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2016 Mar;19(3):122-8. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2016.03.02.
9
Single-incision thoracoscopic surgery and conventional video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective comparative study of perioperative clinical outcomes†.单孔胸腔镜手术与传统电视辅助胸腔镜手术:围手术期临床结局的回顾性比较研究†
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jan;49 Suppl 1:i37-41. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv320. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
10
The Feasibility and Advantages of Subxiphoid Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Lobectomy.经剑突下单操作孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术行肺叶切除术的可行性和优势。
World J Surg. 2019 Jul;43(7):1841-1849. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04948-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus open lobectomy for lung cancer on recovery assessed using self-reported physical function: VIOLET RCT.使用自我报告的身体功能评估,比较电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与开胸肺叶切除术治疗肺癌对恢复的影响:VIOLET RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(48):1-162. doi: 10.3310/THBQ1793.
2
A Brazilian randomized study: Robotic-Assisted vs. Video-assisted lung lobectomy Outcomes (BRAVO trial).巴西一项随机研究:机器人辅助与视频辅助肺叶切除术结果(BRAVO 试验)。
J Bras Pneumol. 2022 Jul 8;48(4):e20210464. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210464. eCollection 2022.
3
Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2022.
2022 年加拿大癌症预估数。
CMAJ. 2022 May 2;194(17):E601-E607. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.212097.
4
Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery reduces perioperative complications and achieves a similar long-term survival profile as posterolateral thoracotomy in clinical N2 stage non-small cell lung cancer patients: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.机器人辅助胸腔镜手术可减少围手术期并发症,并且在临床N2期非小细胞肺癌患者中,其长期生存情况与后外侧开胸手术相似:一项多中心、随机、对照试验。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Nov;10(11):4281-4292. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-898.
5
Assessment of Intercostal Nerve Block Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.评估肋间神经阻滞镇痛在胸外科手术中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2133394. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33394.
6
Comparison of single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and three-port VATS for non-small cell lung cancer.单操作孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)与三操作孔VATS治疗非小细胞肺癌的比较
Oncol Lett. 2019 Aug;18(2):1311-1317. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10394. Epub 2019 May 22.
7
Subxiphoid versus intercostal uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral lung resections: a single-institution experience.剑突下与肋间单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术用于双侧肺切除术:单机构经验
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Feb 1;57(2):343-349. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz206.
8
Comparison of Uniportal versus Multiportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Pulmonary Segmentectomy.单孔与多孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺段切除术的比较
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;52(3):141-147. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.3.141. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
9
Optimal Approach to Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.非小细胞肺癌肺叶切除术的最佳方法:系统评价与Meta分析
Innovations (Phila). 2019 Apr;14(2):90-116. doi: 10.1177/1556984519837027.
10
Risk factors of neuropathic pain after thoracic surgery.胸外科手术后神经性疼痛的危险因素。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 May;10(5):2898-2907. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.25.