Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Amiens Hospital University, Amiens, France.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Marseille University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Mar 29;65(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae082.
Serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) and paravertebral block (PVB) are well known to reduce pain levels after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, the relative efficacies of each block and a combination of the 2 have not been fully characterized. The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy of PVB alone, SAPB alone and the combination of PVB and SAPB with regard to the occurrence and intensity of pain after VATS.
We conducted the THORACOSOPIC single-centre, double-blind, randomized trial in adult patients due to undergo elective VATS lung resection. The participants were randomized to PVB only, SAPB only and PVB + SAPB groups. The primary end-point was pain on coughing on admission to the postanaesthesia care unit. The secondary end-points were postoperative pain at rest and on coughing at other time points and the cumulative opioid consumption. Pain was scored on a visual analogue scale.
One-hundred and fifty-six patients (52 in each group) were included. On admission to the postanaesthesia care unit, the 3 groups did not differ significantly with regard to the pain on coughing: the visual analogue scale score was 3 (0-6), 4 (0-8) and 2 (0-6) in the PVB, SAPB and PVB + SAPB groups, respectively (P = 0.204). During postoperative care, the overall pain score was significantly lower in the SABP + PVP group at rest and on cough.
The combination of SABP + PVB could be beneficial for pain management in VATS in comparison to SABP or PVB alone.
竖脊肌平面阻滞(SAPB)和椎旁阻滞(PVB)已被证实可降低电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)后的疼痛水平。然而,每种阻滞方法的相对疗效以及两者联合应用的效果尚未得到充分描述。本研究旨在评估单独应用 PVB、SAPB 以及 PVB 和 SAPB 联合应用对 VATS 后疼痛发生和强度的影响。
我们在一家成人医院进行了这项名为 THORACOSOPIC 的单中心、双盲、随机试验,研究对象为择期行 VATS 肺切除术的患者。参与者被随机分为仅接受 PVB、仅接受 SAPB 以及 PVB+SAPB 三组。主要终点为入麻醉后恢复室时咳嗽时的疼痛。次要终点为其他时间点的静息和咳嗽时的术后疼痛以及累积阿片类药物消耗量。疼痛通过视觉模拟评分法进行评估。
共有 156 名患者(每组 52 名)纳入研究。入麻醉后恢复室时,三组在咳嗽时的疼痛方面无显著差异:视觉模拟评分分别为 PVB 组 3(0-6)、SAPB 组 4(0-8)和 PVB+SAPB 组 2(0-6)(P=0.204)。在术后护理期间,SAPB+PVP 组在静息和咳嗽时的总体疼痛评分明显更低。
与单独应用 SAPB 或 PVB 相比,SAPB+PVB 联合应用可能更有利于 VATS 术后的疼痛管理。